As the Migrant Crisis Escalates, the German Government Offers Little But Empty Words

ER Editor:  See also this RT report about the marathon meeting over immigration, which sounds rather more upbeat than eugyppius’ more detailed reaction below. That human rights groups are angry with the new set of proposals probably means something of practical value against the migration flood might begin to happen.

Germany to accelerate deportations


After a 17-hour meeting to address the escalating migrant crisis, German federal and state politicians produce a 5,000-word resolution that promises nothing and offers no meaningful solutions at all

Have a taste:

[M]any people … are coming to Europe and Germany. …

This year … irregular migration from third countries has reached a level that is increasingly causing problems, particularly in terms of accommodation and integration. Up to September, more than 230,000 new arrivals … have already applied for asylum. The figure for the same period last year was just over 135,000. We can now assume that more than 300,000 people … will apply for asylum in Germany in 2023 as a whole. …

The major increase in irregular migration has significantly increased the challenges for local authorities, federal states and the federal government. The federal states and local authorities are more and more reaching the limits of what they can afford in terms of reception, accommodation and care. They cannot create additional accommodation indefinitely.

All of this is leading to an overload in many places …

The Federal Chancellor and the heads of the federal states agree that the number of people coming to Germany as refugees must be significantly and sustainably reduced. Clear and targeted measures against uncontrolled immigration that provide quick and effective relief relief and limit the currently excessive influx are therefore needed.

Probably the only meaningful provision in all the words following this preamble is that the federal government will now provide subsidies to the states of 7,500 Euros per year per asylum applicant. This is nothing to celebrate, and not only because states had asked for more than 10,000 Euros. The truth is that nobody cares where the money is coming from; the problem is the migration itself.

In a half-hearted attempt to reduce the attractiveness of Germany to refugees, the agreement proposes delaying their eligibility for social benefits from 18 to 36 months from arrival. It’s unclear this will even be possible, because there’s every chance that the suicidal Federal Court in Karlsruhe (who are responsible for making refugees eligible for benefits in the first place) will find it unconstitutional.

Also to make Germany less attractive, the federal government promises to set up a system whereby refugees will receive “benefits in kind” via payment cards rather than cash. Further on, it promises to “look into” the possibility of processing asylum applications in third states outside the EU. This would massively help, because about half of the new arrivals are denied asylum and then never deported, so I’m glad they’re finally at least thinking about it.

Finally, the agreement makes a lot of noise about securing Europe’s outer borders, but to what end is unclear, because all illegal migrants have to do under current EU rules to gain entry is claim asylum. This is why almost all migrants do this. The same goes for the hot air they blow about policing German borders with Switzerland, the Czech Republic and Poland. As Welt explains, “The coalition government, like its predecessor, has refrained from instructing the federal police to refuse entry to unauthorised arrivals if they claim to be asylum seekers.In fact almost no self-proclaimed refugee is ever turned away; the police act as a mere welcoming party.

NiUS adds this observation:

What all this is worth can be seen in the protocol declarations at the end of the resolution: Bremen and Thuringia (governed by the SPD and the Left) do not want any switch to benefits in kind [instead of cash] for refugees and have various other reservations, Bavaria and Saxony (governed by the CDU/CSU) are calling for a “fundamental change in migration policy,” and Bremen, Thuringia and Niedersachsen (governed by the SPD and the Left) also reject asylum procedures outside Germany and will only contemplate them if the migrants choose this option voluntarily.

In other words, substantial portions of the left at the state level, remaining totally unfazed by the present crisis, are still very much full-steam-ahead on vintage 2015 open-borders Merkelism.

How we got started down the path of unmitigated mass migration is clear enough: Late-stage liberal universalism fuelled by the absence of international conflict after the Cold War, a sclerotic establishment eager to import pliant political clients, and an ageing population worried about impending labour shortages all played their parts. (ER: And the Rothschilds’ front man, George Soros? eugyppius has problems accepting that there is a set of actual perpetrators out there.)

Now that it has gotten out of hand, nobody from Brussels to Berlin can do anything about it, even as their failure to act threatens to destroy them. States really can limit travel and close borders; they did a fine job of both during the pandemic. When it is not an invisible virus they need to stop, but rather millions of foreigners arriving on derelict vessels from the Mediterranean, they are completely powerless.



Featured image: Sean Gallup/Getty Images Europe


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.