Swiss study finds that COVID vaccine heart injury up to 20 times more common than previously claimed

Featured Image Jirattawut Domrong / Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) — A new study has emerged that shows the incidence of myocarditis – a form of potentially fatal heart inflammation – affects up to 1 in 35 people who have received the mRNA COVID-19 injection – whilst markers which indicate heart injury were present in 1 in 20.

The study, titled “Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1237 Booster Vaccination,” was published in a journal of the European Society of Cardiology and has been described as meeting the gold standard of research.

Previously it was maintained by health authorities – such as the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) – that such injuries from the COVID “vaccines” affected only one in 666, or 1,500 cases in every million receiving the injections.

The claim that vaccine injury of any kind, including to the heart, is extremely rare is routinely repeated in the mainstream media, along with government health advice and guidance from the manufacturers themselves.

U.S. Center for Disease Control claiming that adverse events following receipt of the COVID injections are rare

Extremely rare?

Despite the official line that “vaccine” induced myocarditis is very uncommon, the Swiss study, published in the European Journal of Heart Failure on July 5, found that “COVID-19 mRNA-vaccine-associated myocardial injury following booster vaccination may be much more common, as symptoms may be unspecific, mild or even absent, escaping passive surveillance.”

The “passive surveillance” is the description of the common procedures used to detect this type of heart injury, which misses all but the most severe cases. Most studies – including this one – only look at patients for 30 days following their injections.

What this means is that no one really knows how common these injuries actually are – because no one is really looking.

The study is regarded as being of a far higher standard than many others, and was “industry independent” – being conducted with no involvement from the manufacturers of the COVID injections.

Discussing the study, Dr. John Campbell from the U.K. made no qualms about its importance, saying, “If regulators round the world don’t take notice of this information they are at best negligent.”

The study states that since there is an “apparent need” to administer repeated “booster” injections, it is vital to find out the exact prevalence of this type of “vaccine” injury.

As written by the researchers:

Due to waning immunity months after mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations, there is an apparent need for (repeated) booster vaccinations for billions of people worldwide.

Thus knowing the true incidence of mRNA vaccine-associated myocardial injury is of major importance for informed decision-making by patients, physicians and public health authorities.

What is more, the study points out that there is no data on how the “vaccines” affect the heart in the long term.

However, further studies are needed to assess the impact of mRNA vaccine-associated myocardial injury on the long-term risk of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure.

So no one knows how common heart injuries are following mRNA injections, and no one is looking at long term vaccine injury at all.

Correlation is conspiracy

This is not the only study of “vaccine” induced myocarditis. Nor is it the only piece of evidence suggesting that something is seriously wrong with these novel mRNA injections.

As noted U.S. cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough observed in a video from January 2023,

“The peer-reviewed literature can’t be stopped… Even despite a wave of corrupted journals trying to retract these papers, the information’s still getting out.”

He asserted in the same interview that some 1,200 studies exist examining a link consistently denied as a conspiracy theory in the mainstream media – between mRNA COVID “vaccines” and heart injury.

McCullough noted that the U.K. MRHA had published guidance on how to diagnose and treat “vaccine” induced heart conditions. Updated in January, this official advice to medical professionals repeats the same unsubstantiated claims of heart injuries being rare, and does nothing to address the potential long-term health concerns.

UK government’s regulatory health body the MHRA making baseless claims of ‘vaccine’ safety. Source: UK.gov

Yet heart disease itself is not rare. In the U.K. there have been 100,000 excess deaths from heart conditions since 2020, according to the British Heart Foundation.

What is causing all these heart conditions? It’s complicated, say the so-called experts, careful to blame anything but the mounting evidence of vaccine injury.

The media maintains that the record levels of heart failure and disease, especially in the young, has no connection to the mRNA injections.

To suggest a link between these novel treatments and the far higher incidence of myocardial issues is to be branded a crank. The following headline from the Daily Mail of 28th July demonstrates the extraordinary doublethink typical of the mainstream media messaging throughout the deplorable lockdown era.

The Daily Mail itself reports on a slew of surprising cardiac arrests – some fatal – amongst formerly healthy celebrity sports and media personalities. It concedes these take place amidst an unexplained surge in heart conditions – with specialists in the U.S. asking “What’s behind the rise in heart attacks amongst young people?”

When Elon Musk suggested one factor in the heart attack of a well known young person – that of NBA star LeBron James’ teenage son Bronny, his connection of accepted effect with a likely cause attracted the ire of the media.

Elon Musk commenting on LeBron James’ son Bronny suffering a cardiac arrest

The evidence, as Campbell and McCullough have evinced, is now sufficient to warrant a change of this most divisive and despicable tune. How long can the mainstream media provide cover for a pharmaceutical industry which is offered vast profits while indemnified from risk, for a harmful product which few – if anyone – really needed?

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*