Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
Just for additional information, mainstream media platforms are also cracking down on genuine left-wing writers who, once aligned with the old pro-working class, anti-war causes, are now failing to toe today’s fake progressive line of continuous, illegal wars globally; regime change in those countries; economic neoliberalism (i.e. shoveling money up to the already rich); in addition to divide-and-rule ‘progressive’ causes of multiculturalism, enforced mass migration, diversity, minority gender issues and steroid-pumped new feminism. Here is journalist Caitlin Johnstone’s account of how a Mother Jones reporter is cheering for suppression of her work on Medium, too: Mother Jones Senior Reporter Asks Medium To Silence Antiwar Leftists. Johnstone correctly references suppression of authentic left-wing, anti-war journalism from other publications, such as World Socialist Web Site, Counterpunch and Alternet, as well as non-partisan publications such as Consortium News, Truthout, and Wikileaks.
Social media bow to pressure and censor dissident voices
Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, accused of enabling US President Donald Trump’s rise to power through “Russian meddling,” are facing pressure to de-platform heretics. This has raised fears for the safety of free speech in the US.
At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) this past weekend, media crusader James O’Keefe headlined an hour-long panel on social media censorship, arguing that it targeted mostly conservatives.
“They really make sure you don’t see any differing views,” O’Keefe said at the panel.
[Complete video inserted by TLB]
Last week, the blogging platform Medium deleted a number of accounts, including those of Mike Cernovich, Jack Posobiec and Laura Loomer, described by The Hill as “prominent far-right figures.” The purge took place after Medium replaced a commitment to free speech in its terms of service in favor of fighting “online hate, abuse, harassment, and disinformation.”
Though Medium would not comment on individual account bans, it is notable that Cernovich’s account was deleted after he was named in a Newsweek article that blamed the “alt-right,” overseas social media bots and “Russians” for the ouster of Senator Al Franken (D-Minnesota) over sexual misconduct. Newsweek retracted the story after criticism that it could not be substantiated.
A number of YouTube creators have complained that the video platform has demonetized basically anything that isn’t deemed “family friendly,” including political dissent. Another crackdown followed the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, after the top-ranking video on the site featured accusations that some of the students were “crisis actors.”
Yet if YouTube simply censored any videos even referring to conspiracy theories, that would surely present a new problem. After all, wouldn’t it also undermine efforts to debunk them?
I find it scary that Youtube is taking down conspiracy videos.
The problem is tough. Fake news is really bad but should people have a right to freely express themselves even if they are wrong?
What if Youtube decides a news report is a conspiracy but it turns out to be true?
Conservative critics accuse the social media giants of being run by Democrats. There is certainly evidence pointing in that direction, from the involvement of Alphabet (Google’s parent company) CEO Eric Schmidt with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Obama presidency, to Twitter’s admission it censored the hashtags about WikiLeaks’ publication of revealing emails from Clinton’s campaign chief John Podesta in the run-up to the November 2016 vote. Those emails also revealed the commitment of several Facebook executives to get Clinton elected.
After Clinton lost to Trump, however, the three social media giants found themselves in the crosshairs of Congress. Many Republicans joined the chorus of Democrats accusing the social networks of enabling alleged “Russian” activity.
“You created these platforms… and now they’re being misused,” Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) told the executives of Facebook, Google, and Twitter during a hearing in October 2017. “And you have to be the ones who do something about it — or we will.”
So far, “doing something” seems to consist mostly of purging “Russian bots,” as identified by either the social media companies themselves or an alliance of Democrats and neo-conservatives ousted from power by Trump, and now seeing Russians behind every hashtag.
At least 95% of headline about what “Russian Twitter bots” are supposedly doing is from Hamilton68. Here’s what Vox said about its co-director, Jamie Fly, who spent years writing for Weekly Standard, attacking Obama for not bombing Iran & then for Rubio: https://www.vox.com/2015/9/21/9367393/scott-walker-marco-rubio …pic.twitter.com/TwF4XH2sV6
The people who formed Hamilton68 are DC’s worst warmongers & liars. They are long-time disinformation agents. *Bill Kristol* put the group together. They follow only 600 Twitter accounts, secretly designated by them as “pro-Russian.” And US media uncritically swallows every claim
Everyone supporting #DumpNRATV is cool with other groups of Americans organizing activism campaigns to remove other channels, right? Because there’s no way this impulse to censor and remove controversial programming could be turned against your favorites, right?
In a recent interview, former Google engineer James Damore speculated that the climate at social media companies is reminiscent of college and university campuses. Such locations have seen crackdowns on freedom of expression in recent times.
“It was very much like a college campus,” Damore told the Washington Examiner. “And they tried to make it like a college campus where you would live at Google essentially, where they have all your food and all the amenities, and once you start living there you aren’t able to disconnect, and so you feel like my words were a threat against your family. That was part of the fervor, I think.”
Damore was purged from Mountain View over a memo in which he questioned the company’s practices when it came to the heart of the issue of diversity.
ICYMI, my interview with @JamesADamore, wherein he observes parallels between the culture at Google and the culture on college campuses, reflects on the memo, and discusses his future. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/google-memo-author-james-damore-at-cpac-google-was-very-much-like-a-college-campus/article/2649909 …
Google memo author James Damore at CPAC: Google ‘was very much like a college campus’
Damore said Google fights so hard to build a community that his criticism was taken as a threat to the entire community.
While the social media companies may hope the lawmakers would be appeased by an occasional purge of unpopular voices, another danger is headed their way: The legacy media is aiming to recapture its hold on audiences.
On Monday, CNN president Jeff Zucker addressed the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. His thrust was that government should look into Google and Facebook “monopolies” if journalism is to survive.
“In a Google and Facebook world, monetization of digital and mobile continues to be more difficult than we would have expected or liked,” Zucker said, according to Variety. “I think we need help from the advertising world and from the technology world to find new ways to monetize digital content, otherwise good journalism will go away.”
Tempting as it would be to quip about CNN’s tenuous relationship with “good journalism.” At this time, doing so would be self-defeating as the chances are it would get one a short-cut to getting purged from Google, Twitter or Facebook.
TLB recommends other pertinent articles from RT News/op-ed
Follow TLB on Twitter @thetlbproject