NHS Crisis: 35,000+ ‘Excess’ Cancer Deaths Due To COVID19 Policies

ER Editor: A reminder that today, Thursday November 5th, the UK enters its second lockdown.

********

NHS Crisis: 35,000+ ‘Excess’ Cancer Deaths Due To COVID19 Policies

Medical industry experts are warning that Britain’s National Health Service is headed for more than 35,000 excess cancer deaths due to postponed and canceled appointments/treatments, thanks to the government’s policies on COVID19.

The Clinical Services Journal (CSJ) (November 03, 2020) reports that while some elective care procedures are being resumed, many already had lengthy waiting lists even before the pandemic hit and they are growing rapidly.

 

The journal has identified that clinicians and service providers are still coming to terms with the impending crisis and speaks of “stark consequences” due the enormous backlog of untreated patients told to go home and wait it out while the country goes back to a second national lockdown this week over rising coronavirus cases (which are not translating into any abnormal rise in excess deaths).

Britain’s Public Health Service Showed 530,000 Fewer Elective Admissions In April, According To NHS CEO Sir Simon Stevens.

Brian King, writing for CSJ, expresses a growing concern felt by many in the health care sector that even if the NHS were to begin to fully resume elective care today, waiting lists will still be at least doubled from 4.2 million to approximately 10 million by Christmas.

It is entirely probable that number will likely haemorrhage even further as England enters its second full scale lockdown on Thursday, which ministers say may be extended beyond the one-month proposed limit.

The Clinical Services Journal paints a distressing picture for anyone left high and dry, not knowing when they may be screened or be admitted for treatment. It tells us:

“Further, a postponement of some services has meant delays in diagnosis and treatment for life-limiting conditions. Even a delay of a few months can result in significant complications or disease progression for some patients. DATA-CAN, a Health Data Research Hub, has suggested the pandemic could lead to 35,000 ‘excess’ cancer deaths, with a backlog in screenings resulting in missed or delayed diagnosis.”

The NHS Faces A Double Whammy: Even When Elective Procedures And Screenings Do Resume, Another Challenge Lies In Capacity.

Many hospitals are reporting significantly reduced capacity, as a result of staff shortages and increased infection control measures.

NHS CEO, Sir Simon Stevens, knows he faces a monumental headache because worried patients with life-threatening condition such as cancer cannot be put on hold. Hundreds of thousands will have an agonising and prolonged wait against a merciless disease that could take them beyond the limits of medical intervention.

Brian King laments:

“There are clear challenges on the horizon for the NHS. It will take a monumental effort for elective care systems to return to prepandemic levels, and possibly even a complete reimagining of some services.”

For pragmatists, the only solution is a total reassessment of the role private suppliers play. Ministers may have to bite the bullet and implement a new public-private partnership as the way to steer the country out of the next likely pandemic – that of excess cancer deaths! (ER: Which is surely the end goal, to privatize the system.)

Read more at www.clinicalservicesjournal.com

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*