Germany should hold ‘Dexit’ vote on leaving EU, says AfD leader

ER Editor: For copyright reasons, we’ve republished half of the article and summarized the rest as it mostly lies behind a paywall. A reminder that the UK Telegraph is heavily MSM so we can expect the usual mischaracterizations to be given, such as the AfD being racist, pro-Russian, etc. Weidel’s position sounds reasonable to us and probably to a lot of Germans, especially those in the East where the AfD originated.

We’ve inserted links to a couple of stories we’ve recently published to provide another lens on the biased Telegraph report.

#Dexit

(browsers will translate tweets in other languages)

Translation: DEXIT? I would be for it. Anyone who is against it can also vote against it. It’s called “democracy”. Where is the problem?

********

Germany should hold ‘Dexit’ vote on leaving EU, says AfD leader

Alice Weidel says if an Alternative for Germany government cannot get reform of the European Commission, ‘it should let the people decide’

JAMES CRISP for THE TELEGRAPH

Britain was “dead right” to leave the European Union and Germany should hold its own “Dexit” vote, the leader of the hard-Right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has said.

Alice Weidel, of the poll-topping Afd, said she would push for a referendum on EU membership if her party came to power.

Ms. Weidel said the vote would be held if an AfD government could not secure reforms to curb overreach by the ‘unelected’ European Commission.

‘If a reform isn’t possible, if we fail to rebuild the sovereignty of the EU member states, we should let the people decide, just as Britain did,’ she told the Financial Times.

‘And we could have a referendum on ‘Dexit’ – a German exit from the EU.’

She added: ‘It is a model for Germany, that one can make a sovereign decision like that.’

Winning such a referendum, even if it met strict German laws for plebiscites, would be a tall order, with 90 per cent of people in favour of continued membership.

The AfD is leading the polls in all five East German states ahead of regional elections in September. The party’s results in June’s European Parliament elections will also be closely watched amid predictions of success for Eurosceptic parties across the bloc, including in France, Austria and the Netherlands.

It is polling nationally at 22 per cent, behind the centre-Right opposition Christian Democratic Union but ahead of all three parties in Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s struggling coalition government.

However, the AfD’s current success does not guarantee it a place in a future government.

Establishment parties have ruled out coalition deals with it and it does not lead any of Germany’s 16 states because of the cordon sanitaire or firewall by the other parties.

ER: A new party is being formed by the former head of the German domestic intelligence services, Hans-Georg Maassen, and this party WOULD be willing to work with the AfD. See —

New German Conservative Faction Willing to Break Away and Cooperate with AfD

Ms. Weidel admitted that the AfD would not be able to take power in Berlin before 2029 but said a future role in government was ‘inevitable’.

She predicted that the CDU, the centre-right party of former chancellor Angela Merkel would be the first to break the ‘firewall’ of establishment forces and ally with the AfD.

She said” ‘The CDU won’t be able to maintain its firewall in the long term.”

“We can form a clear Right-wing majority. And the CDU can’t refuse to accept that in the long term, especially in the eastern states.’

CONTINUE READING HERE

We summarize here. Weidel goes on to talk about her party reforming tax laws, reducing government bureaucracy and stopping Germany going to renewable energy. The Times article mentions the AfD being far right as per intelligence service classification, with calls to ban it because party members allegedly attended ‘far right’ meetings. There were ‘echoes of Nazi ideology’ according to the Telegraph report, with anti-AfD demonstrations ‘being held across the country’. According to eugyppius, whom we published only yesterday, these anti-far right protests were staged this past weekend by known leftist groups loyal to Scholz to divert public attention well away from the farmer protests. See —

Scholz calls for nationwide protests to defend democracy against the consequences of his own policies

The party is accused of wanting to deport millions of migrants, even those with passports, to which she responds that the party stands for lawful repatriation of people, especially those with a deportation order. She supports the return of Ukrainian refugees and is critical of the 1.1 million Ukrainians in Germany being able to draw benefits. The Telegraph report continues, noting that Scholz’s economic failures have made the party popular. The Telegraph also uses the ‘pro-Russia’ smear, naturally.

************

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*