ER Editor: This is a most interesting account of what went on with the Corona Committee. That there should have been some scheme to undermine the work of this committee is obvious.
UPDATE. REINER FUELLMICH SPEAKS OUT. His Personal Statement, Part 2.
Like every week at 8 pm in Europe (2 pm Eastern), this Sunday, December 10, 2023, Roger Bittel gave his update.
This time he had major news. Reiner had written a personal account, and it was read aloud for listeners. The first part was read aloud last week (English translation here).
It was a long statement. I started to translate. Fortunately, this morning, a German friend sent me the written German text, so could use deepl.com to do most of the translating. Massively helpful. I did reread, to check.
NOTE: I HAVE BEEN TOLD THERE ARE A COUPLE OF ERRORS DUE TO DEEPL (AND MY NOT QUITE PERFECT GERMAN.) I WILL MAKE THE CHANGES AS SOON AS THEY ARE DONE.
Now here is this week’s statement in English – (a couple of amendments to come).
REINER FUELLMICH’S PERSONAL STATEMENT – PART 2
Dear friends, fellow activists and fellow human beings interested in the truth, this is the second part of my personal statement to make the events of recent weeks, months and years transparent for all of you. How did it come about that serious allegations of embezzlement were made against me publicly and in a criminal complaint by four former fellow members of the Corona Committee, in this case CA? Who were the people I trusted when the CA was founded and when I worked with them?
How did it come about that I am now sitting in a high-security prison in Germany and completely innocent? Above all, I have to reproach myself, because my professional gut feeling clearly betrayed me. Or I didn’t listen to it enough and I simply didn’t pay enough attention to details in my daily doing. Otherwise I would have noticed the planned coup much earlier.
But first things first. My wife Inka and I lived with our dogs on our ranch in northern California until the beginning of June 2020 and I mainly did my legal work from there. When the 2020 pandemic started, we were both immediately convinced that something was wrong. I quickly packed my bags because I wanted to help shed light on the pandemic in Germany.
After all, I had 30 years of experience as a litigation lawyer and had spent many years studying medical and pharmaceutical law at the University of Göttingen. In addition, I had many contacts from my work in medical law. Dr. WW, whom I trusted at the time, put me in touch with Ms. VF. (ER: We believe this is Wolfgang Wodarg and Viviane Fischer) At a first personal meeting in Berlin, I was disturbed by her strange appearance and some of her behavior, but I decided to take off my critical glasses, ignore my gut feeling and trust a learned friend. We agreed to set up the Corona Committee of Inquiry, because it was clear in June 2020 that the German Bundestag, which was actually responsible for this, would not take up its own investigation for reasons that were not yet apparent to me at the time. The CA was to clarify these central questions immediately:
1. how dangerous is the supposedly new corona virus really?
2. how reliable and suitable is the PCR test for detecting coronavirus infections?
3. how harmful are the corona measures, i.e. lockdowns, compulsory masks, social distancing and the threat of so-called vaccinations?
Scientists, doctors, economists, lawyers, politicians and so on should help us to clarify these questions. Two German scientists, a professor of finance and an expert in immunology and vaccinations were already part of our circle. Unfortunately, they did not agree with the contracts from VF, drawn up by her notary, and therefore dropped out.
I remember that one of them also distrusted VF from the outset.
We needed a replacement quickly. Two years earlier, I had met law professor Martin Schwab while working for the anti-corruption NGO Transparency International and had been friends with him ever since.
He, in turn, had introduced me to two lawyers he was supporting, now known as the “port lawyers”. Relying on Prof. Schwab’s expertise and knowledge of human nature, I asked them if they would like to replace the scientists on the CA. Today I know that was the beginning of the end, because in my opinion both quickly showed in their behavior that money meant more to them than educational work.
Outwardly, the CA quickly enjoyed a completely unexpected success. As we conducted the expert interviews in German and English via video stream, our Friday broadcasts quickly became popular worldwide. Many people also had high hopes that we would later use the findings from these interviews as evidence in international damages proceedings such as class actions in the Anglo-American region.
We were in the right place at the right time with our work. I was and am convinced of that. Unfortunately, things looked different internally. I quickly realized that the other members of the committee, especially the two replacements who had moved up, seemed to have little interest in our educational work. In contrast to me.
I concentrated almost entirely on this educational work. In addition to the interviews that took place every Friday in the committee, I also conducted an average of five further international interviews per week and also endeavored to provide information about our work worldwide and not just in Germany.
After I had learned from critical experts that a PCR test cannot under any circumstances scientifically determine an infection and that it had obviously been deliberately misused in the context of the plandemic, I made a 50-minute video on this topic in German and English in September 2020. In it, I explained that the corona measures, which had already led to more and more victims and damage at that time, could be legally qualified as crimes against humanity and that we should best clarify them legally using the means of Anglo-American law.
To my surprise, the video was viewed millions of times before it was suddenly deleted by YouTube and Google. Based on this video, American colleague Robert F. Kennedy Jr, whom I first met in person in Berlin in August 2020, founded the PCR Test Working Group on his platform CHD with the help of its president Mary Holland. I am also a member of this group. Since October 2020, respected scientists, doctors, lawyers, etc. have been meeting there every week to discuss all aspects related to the plandemic. At the same time, I regularly summarized our long interviews in CA in German on the Roger Bittel TV platform on Sundays.
The enormous popularity of CA achieved in this way led to a large number of inquiries as early as August 2020. In particular, small and medium-sized companies wanted to know how they could obtain compensation for the damage suffered, legal colleagues from the US and from all over the world wanted to be connected with the experts, because at that time many lawyers still believed that taking evidence in court with our PCR test experts would quickly bring down the whole panic house of cards based on deception and manipulation.
This led to the collection of funds for the implementation of a possible class action. The funds are all there, but in my opinion they were directed to another account by way of fraud. I report on this in detail elsewhere.
Based on my almost 30 years of litigation experience, I was rather skeptical that a solid legal approach would quickly be successful in Germany and the rest of the world.
That’s why I advised litigating for damages in an Anglo-American country first, where there is the possibility of class actions and a real right of proof and punitive damages for intentional infliction of damage. My international colleagues are currently working hard on this project. The topic of class actions is as present as ever and we are convinced that it will finally bring the hoped-for success.
Dear friends, fellow campaigners and fellow human beings interested in the truth. In the third part of my personal statement, it will quickly become clear to you that I was always more of a lone fighter and that, in my opinion, my co-partners were pulling on the same rope to get rid of me and ultimately ruin me privately.
I watched this develop for far too long. That’s why I share responsibility for this as well as for everything else. As a person, but even more so as a lawyer, I should have seen these events coming and prevented them.
Back to the story. So while I was working on all cylinders for the CA and investing all my energy, the other members strangely didn’t seem to realize the real importance of the CA’s work. None of them attended the weekly strategy meetings on Mondays, for example.
None of them made any effort to publicize the work of the CA, especially beyond the borders of Germany.
From the end of 2022, JH and AF in particular were, in my opinion, only interested in how they could earn as much money as possible with their newly founded office partnership with Corona clients, which they themselves referred to as “port lawyers”. In the weekly meetings of the committee, on the other hand, they hardly ever appeared or were sometimes not present for the entire meeting. Eventually, they were absent altogether.
When I, together with the group of international lawyers, conducted the Grand Jury investigations with the help of our experts at the end of 2021/beginning of 2022 to show that and how a legal investigation into the pandemic could work, these “port lawyers” no longer played any role at all.
However, the legal model procedure, the Grand Jury Investigation, became a worldwide and therefore internationally recognized success.
The work of the CA was now so popular that we had already received a large number of donations by the end of 2020.
However, we only needed some of these donations to pay for our technology, IT, translators, expenses for my office, etc.
There was a large amount of money in our donation account. From our point of view, this money was not safe. Blocking or seizing the accounts, as happened then and since then with many doctors and scientists, for example Prof. Stefan Hockertz and some doctors who have since been prosecuted in the worst possible way for issuing mask liberation tests, would have immediately rendered us unable to act.
VF and I therefore decided to leave only the amounts directly required for the work of the CA in the donation account and to keep the funds not initially required safe from possible access by unauthorized third parties.
I now know that the LKA Lower Saxony had even asked the public prosecutor’s office to investigate VF, RF, AF and JH and a colleague who had temporarily managed the donation account for us due to suspicions of money laundering on the part of the banks, which had repeatedly terminated our donation account. However, these investigations were later dropped.
To make sure that we would not be vulnerable due to the security of the money, we concluded loan agreements, which were also disclosed in the annual financial statements.
Of course, it would have made no sense to transfer the loans from one disclosed account to another open account. So we decided to invest them in my German property – as an equivalent value – and in gold as a safe store of value.
The house was worth at least €1.345 million. We wanted to sell it anyway and look for a new place to live in Germany and run the law firm from rented premises in the future.
Therefore, the money I took out on loan was safe, as I believed at the time. But things turned out differently. I will report on that.
We also invested around €1 million in donations in gold, which was also disclosed in the annual financial statements. VF also agreed a loan with the CA by contract. This withdrawal also served to secure our funds. The loan amounted to over € 100,000. This was also reported in the annual financial statements.
In July August 2021, the two replacements JH and AF suddenly contacted us again to ask for information about the amount of the donations. I suspected that their legal efforts had been unsuccessful, because in the meantime I had learned that they had no office structure in their one-room office and, according to third parties, they had not even been able to hire at least a secretary or organize themselves in any other way.
I only found out about all this afterwards, as JH and AF had in fact long since left the work of the CA and also because they had recently started working closely with a person who, as I had learned, had infiltrated the political party die Basis together with a Freemason. VF and I initially refused to provide this information.
However, to avoid wasting energy on avoidable arguments, we finally handed over an overview of income and expenditure.
It then quickly became clear that these two original replacements wanted to hijack the CA and eliminate at least me from it. When the attempt failed, JH finally proposed to VF and me in a written settlement that he and AF would leave the company if we paid them half of all donations, a considerable sum in total, to an account of their mentor Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab.
Of course, VF and I refused, precisely because the two of them had never really been involved in the committee’s work in the long term, and finally asked JH and AF to stay off the committee. We heard nothing more from them for about a year.
At the end of 2021, VF founded a new company to operate the CA with my consent and with the help of its notary. VF and I each had and still have a 50 percent stake in this company. This new CA also had its own account, so it no longer had to rely on other lawyers’ accounts. All the assets of the old company were transferred to this new company. I approved the contracts submitted to me by VF. This second company was thus created as a legal entity.
At the beginning of 2022, however, the cooperation with VF had unfortunately become increasingly difficult for me personally. In my opinion, she was now displaying similar behavior to the two replacements JH and AF. I therefore accepted the offer to take part in the Crimes against Humanity tour in the USA.
However, this meant that I would spend almost three and a half months traveling and lecturing in nine US cities with two well-known US scientists – Dr. Judy Mikovits and the economist and expert on technology and transhumanism, Patrick Wood.
However, I continued all of the relevant activities from there. I continued to conduct interviews via internet, gave an average of five interviews a week, attended the PCR Test Working Group conferences and summarized the committee meetings every weekend.
In addition, I worked with international colleagues to set in motion their legal proceedings with the goal of large tort litigation. At that time, I was on the verge of burnout.
After my return from the USA, I realized that the chaotic incompetence of VF and her indifference towards our guests, which I had grudgingly accepted until then, had increased.
I therefore confronted her in July 2022.
I told her that I would go back to our ranch in California with my wife and the dogs, also to be closer to the relevant legal events, but that I would continue the committee work as usual.
I also urgently wanted more input from her.
Immediately afterwards, as I know today, VF got in touch with JH and AF again, as well as their law firm colleague MT. There was probably a meeting and a discussion in August 2022.
Following this meeting, the joint public defamation campaign against me began on 2 September 2022 and they filed a criminal complaint against me on the same day. I knew nothing about this at the time.
Due to the coinciding of the dates of my dismissal from the committee and the criminal complaint, it is now clear to me that the other side was obviously never interested in an amicable settlement of the internal disputes.
One week before September 2, 2022, VF had untruthfully informed me that there would allegedly be no broadcast of the committee on that day because the wife of our TV manager was due to have her second child. A lie, as I later realized.
Since I initially believed the lie and didn’t show up, VF and WW had a clear shot at me, as VF put it in hunter’s terms.
VF appeared on camera dramatically dressed in black. She publicly declared to the audience, without having informed me, her equal partner and managing director of the CA, that I would no longer be allowed to appear in the CA from now on. She therefore decided unilaterally and completely arbitrarily that I was no longer allowed to be present in the CA, which I had significantly shaped up to that point, and of which I still owned 50 percent of the shares both then and now.
To justify her unlawful and above all anti-company approach, she and WW also publicly declared on camera that I was allegedly guilty of financial irregularities and that I was a loudmouth. WW was particularly fond of this label.
I was still hoping that we could resolve everything amicably, because I didn’t want to unnecessarily burden CA and its global reputation with internal problems and damage its reputation as a result. A vain hope. A short time later, VF, WW, JH, AF and VF’s partner at the time appeared in front of the camera again for an hour-long Reiner Fuellmich tribunal on a Friday afternoon, VF again all in black.
This campaign eventually culminated in several increasingly crazy videos by VF, in which she even claimed that the children of the committee members had to starve because of me.
Apparently completely out of control, she finally called for a hunt for me and crowned this call with a “Halali”, a German hunting call that signals the end of a hunt.
Not only I, but also the viewers were shocked by the behavior, as could be seen from the comments in the chats. The content of the 30-page criminal complaint, which JH also submitted on behalf of AF and MT, reads almost more crazily. JH and MT knew in 2020 that €700,000 in donations from the committee had been pledged by me via a loan agreement and secured with my property as a store of value.
They also knew that the sale had been planned by me and my wife for a long time and was imminent. Our property was sold on 3.10.2022 for €1,345,000 in our absence via a notary. Unfortunately, as I mentioned, we have never seen any of this money to this day. I’ll explain how this coup went down in the next part.
And it gets even worse. After receiving the criminal complaint, I should have been given a legal hearing in accordance with the principle of “audiatur et altera pars”, i.e. “always hear the other side, too”. But I was denied this. Today I know the reasons. JH claimed in all seriousness to the public prosecutor’s office that I was threatening him with a Winchester.
And because that didn’t seem dangerous enough, he went on to claim that, as a member of the party, I was radicalizing the base, other members and inciting violence against him.
He also claimed that I was anti-Semitic and that he felt threatened because of his ethnic origin. I suspect that because of these completely fictitious threat scenarios, the authorities denied me and my wife the right to a fair clarification of the situation for more than a year. Apparently the public prosecutor’s office actually felt under pressure with this threat scenario. JH even told the authorities that they would withdraw the criminal complaint if the public prosecutor’s office would provide me a fair hearing.
He literally writes, quote “If Fuellmich or one of the other defendants were given the opportunity to make a statement before criminal proceedings have been initiated, the witnesses (i.e. VF, JH, AV and MT) would refrain from filing criminal charges due to fear of fraud, violence and defamation” end of quote.
My wife’s private account was then seized. When our lawyers asked for my wife’s right to be heard, they were told that they would not be given any information because she was also under investigation.
A European arrest warrant was then issued against me on 15.3.2023, of course without me being granted a hearing. In the meantime, my wife and I had set off on a trip to Peru regarding the class action lawsuit.
On the way back, we wanted to visit friends in Mexico and fly back to Germany from there. There, however, we received information from our home town that the authorities were allegedly looking for me.
Unfortunately, the colleagues from my law firm did not receive any information about the situation from the authorities. We were unable to properly assess the new scenario at home and therefore stayed in Mexico for the time being. As a counterpart to the Corona Committee, I now had my own format, ICIC, with which I interviewed international experts on global crimes against humanity, as I had previously done in the committee.
A small working group from the former CA had followed me and so we were quickly able to work intensively again. Nevertheless, everything plunged back into complete chaos in October 2023. This was because the temporary end of the hunt by my former colleagues in the CA ended with the execution of the aforementioned European arrest warrant against me in Frankfurt, after I had previously been deported from a non-European country, Mexico, under police protection.
A crime story that I now know was anything but a coincidence. I’ll tell you about it in the next episode. As we shall see, I have been sitting, innocent, in a high-security prison for weeks.
In my opinion, the real perpetrators are at large. They also have all the money from the plaintiff class action and most of the money from my private home.
I will prove this. All the relevant documents are safely stored with my legal team. In the next episode, I will report on how the agitators brought everything to a successful conclusion for the time being.
PS. By the way, if you’re moved to donate, and can afford it, here is the link for donations for legal and other expenses: https://www.givesendgo.com/GBBX2
Posted December 13, 2023
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.