ER Editor: See also this related article,
MP requests urgent investigation into excess deaths
UK Department of Health refuses to answer when ONS will publish updated data
Andrew Bridgen, independent Member of Parliament (“MP”) for North West Leicestershire, asked when the Office for National Statistics (“ONS”) would publish an update of the Deaths by Vaccination data. He received a robotic response from the Department of Health and Social Care (“DHSC”).
In Parliament on Tuesday, immediately after Esther McVey, MP for Tatton, requested an urgent and thorough investigation into excess deaths, Mr. Bridgen, asked when the ONS would publish updated data on deaths by vaccination status:
“The ONS have not issued mortality data by vaccination status since 31 of May last year … can [the Minister] inform the House when it will be published?”
The Minister Mr. Bridgen was addressing was Maria Caulfield, DHSC Under-Secretary. Someone pressed Caulfield’s replay button as she basically gave the same response to Mr. Bridgen as she had given to Ms. McVey moments earlier, even though the two questions put to her were very different:
“There are a number of factors, which are the same factors that have driven excess deaths across the United Kingdom but also across Europe.”
It’s as if Caulfield is a mindless robot pre-programmed with a script that contains very few lines.
The above was clipped from ‘Oral questions: Health and Social Care, House of Commons, Tuesday 24 January 2023’. You can watch the full session on Parliament TV HERE.
In May 2022, the Office of National Statistics stopped publishing data on the vaccination status of those who had died. The ONS report with this data was titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’.
Because the dataset was deliberately biased in favour of showing the “vaccines” were “safe and effective” and was being used to promote the “safe and effective” narrative, in November 2022 four researchers – Professor Norman Fenton, Professor Martin Neil, Dr. Clare Craig and Scott McLachlan – made a formal complaint to the UK Statistics Regulator about ONS’ data stating it was “a matter of national concern and scandal.”
Last week the Regulator confirmed that the data could not be used to justify that covid injections were “safe and effective.” As a consequence, the researchers called on BBC and others to publicly retract their “safe and effective” statements which had been based on this dataset.
That bias was injected into the data was confirmed by two other researchers, El Gato Malo and Joel Smalley who both re-analysed the deaths by vaccination status data and concluded that the vaccinated were already dying proportionally more than the unvaccinated up to May 2022 when the ONS stopped reporting.
As Joel Smalley noted:
In 2020, we were bombarded daily with scary, fake covid stats to keep people in a state of fear so that they would succumb to the experimental “cure.”
In 2021, we were bombarded with stories of how effective the “vaccine” was and how dumb the unvaccinated were who should be ostracised from society.
And yet in 2022, whilst we remain in a situation of higher mortality than expected, there is a conspicuous lack of interest to report.
Is there something to hide?
Is the UK Hiding the True Magnitude of Fatal Harm Caused by the mRNA Experiment? Joel Smalley, 30 December 2022
- BBC must publicly retract covid vaccine “safety and efficacy” claims made based on ONS data
- Vaccinated were already dying proportionally more than the unvaccinated up to May last year when the ONS stopped reporting
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply