ER Editor: According to euronews, Sweden Democrats, the supposedly ‘far right’ party, got 20.6% of the vote, but final results in what turned out to be a very close election this past Sunday won’t be known until tomorrow as overseas ballots and advanced ballots need to be counted. Turnout was estimated at 80%.
Sweden Democrats as election winners
On Sunday, the Swedish parliamentary elections took place. In the traditionally fragmented party landscape, the centre-right bloc dared for the first time to include the anti-globalisation and patriotic Sweden Democrats (SD) in their alliance.
This may have paid off: As things stand, the new alliance won a wafer-thin majority against the left-wing bloc around WEF candidate Magdalena Andersson.
The Sweden Democrats came in second as an individual party for the first time and won over 20 percent of the electorate.
The right-wing camp made up of “moderates”, Christian Democrats and liberals had broken a taboo and for the first time entered into an alliance with the right-wing Sweden Democrats. If the three-way alliance is successful, the right would be involved in the government in Stockholm for the first time.
The right-wing conservative electoral success is, of course, also a call for help from many Swedish voters. Parts of the country and especially the larger cities have become no-go zones. Civil war-like riots are becoming more and more common in “multicultural” metropolitan areas such as Malmö and Stockholm, in the face of which the police are helpless. Sunday’s election result is the first result. The final election result is expected on Wednesday.
WEF ‘Agenda Contributor’ loses election
Social Democrat Magdalena Andersson is the “Agenda Contributor” to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and only succeeded her party colleague Stefan Löfven as head of government in November. She also recently led her country into NATO.
Former Prime Minister Stefan Löfven (ER: see his WEF page here) had been a regular guest at the WEF summit in Davos and in 2016, for example, gave a speech on the implementation of the “Agenda 2030”, which set out the goals that are now considered part of the world transformation via the “Great Reset”. Under his leadership, the country openly committed itself to its implementation.
As an individual party, Andersson’s party was also the first to cross the finish line this time. But the fact that only about 30 percent voted for the Social Democrats is seen in Sweden as a major defeat for the party, which had been dominant for decades.
The fact that the collapse at the ballot box was not even more severe could also be due to the fact that state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell was able to prevail against potential hotheads during the Corona debates with his “Swedish model” based only on recommendations while avoiding harsh lockdowns.
Various media outlets reported on Sweden’s special path during the pandemic. Nevertheless, inflation is now hitting the Swedish population hard.
Patriotic line as recipe for success
Apparently, the citizens of the Scandinavian country no longer trust the left-wing globalist government to cope with this crisis situation.
Moreover, Andersson’s administration is under criticism for their inaction against the consequences of the mass migration advocated by WEF, UN and other global institutions. Excesses of violence are becoming more and more rampant in numerous cities, and poorly integrated migrants are shown as responsible.
In 2015/16, Sweden took in the highest number of asylum seekers per capita of all EU countries. The upheavals were therefore not surprising as Sweden has never dealt with a multi-ethnic society and has at most a childish grasp of what it means.
This whole mixture of events has been a boon for the Sweden Democrats around party leader Jimmie Åkesson and his party gained momentum.
On the one hand, the party is strictly critical of migration, but on the other hand, it is also committed to the achievements of the Swedish welfare state. This solidarity-based course means that people in working-class districts in particular give the SD their trust: yet they are the first to suffer from the consequences of the globalists’ agendas on mass migration as well as inflation.
System media rejoice prematurely
Still on Sunday evening, numerous system media outlets had nevertheless proclaimed Andersson’s supposed narrow election a victory. But the announcements were not based on actual outcomes. In the course of Monday, however, their probable election defeat became evident. According to the current count, Andersson’s left-wing bloc has only 173 seats, while the centre-right bloc has 176.
The leader of the third-placed Moderate Party, Ulf Kristersson, will most likely become Sweden’s prime minister. He is also mentioned on the WEF homepage. His involvement with the Globalist Forum, however, is likely to be more fleeting than that of WEF star speaker Löfven or that of Andersson, who actively participated in the Schwab think tank in the past.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.