Software Developed to Detect ‘Non-vaccinated’ Individuals

ER Editor: It’s utterly surreal but the Italian report linked to below (browsers can translate into English) gives no mention as to HOW exactly the technology detects who has and hasn’t received a vaccine, what might be in those vaccines which allows such technology to work, and how Big Brother this all is. But hey, it’s all being done in the name of ‘not leaving people behind’, especially the frail and fragile. You couldn’t make this up. And it’s a group of GPs who are behind this software.

Is this even a real story, we wonder …? Is this part of the movie some claim we are currently witnessing?

FreeWest Media takes it seriously and juxtaposes the suspected extent of vaccine damage in Germany.

We remind readers that the Austrian Minister of Health is now ready to shuffle responsibility for Covid vaccine harms off onto doctors, such being the extent of vaccine damage. See

Austrian Minister of Health Confirms – Doctors Are Responsible for Vaccine Damage

********

Software developed to detect ‘non-vaccinated’ individuals

The Italian Association of General Practitioners Fimmg and the organization Cittadinanzattiva have developed software that could be used to identify two million “unvaccinated” patients in Italy that could pose a “risk”.

FREEWEST MEDIA

Italian daily La Repubblica reported on this development.

For this reason, the two organizations have asked for a meeting with Minister of Health Roberto Speranza and General Francesco Paolo Figliuolo to fully explain the potential of such technology for the health of citizens when placed in the hands of general medicine.

According to La Repubblica, 520,000 people over 80 and 1.5 million citizens aged 70-79 have not yet received their first dose. Silvestro Scotti, Secretary General of Fimmg, and Anna Lisa Mandorino, Secretary General of Cittadinanzattiva, commented on the issue: “Minister Speranza and Commissioner Figliuolo wanted to meet with us immediately, which shows great political sensitivity and attention to an issue of enormous importance.”

As La Repubblica explains, NetMedica Italia, Fimmg’s IT company, in collaboration with the Computer Engineering department of the Polytechnic University of Marche, has developed an algorithm based on artificial intelligence solutions.

Applied to GPs’ clinical and health databases, the algorithm is able to provide clues that, while not definitive, can assist the physician in determining the priority for administering the injection. (ER: What ‘clues’?)

The resource is “integrated with other useful tools for the full management of the patient’s active recruitment path and the entire vaccination process” and is already being used by many doctors across the country.

What about side-effects?

In Germany alone, some 2,5 million people have received medical care for side effects from the experimental injections until the end of 2021. This is apparent from a shocking report from the German doctors’ organization KBV.

German MP Martin Sichert (AfD) asked the director of the KBV in March how many patients had been treated by a doctor because of complaints after a jab.

Three months later, Sichert was sent a highly explosive three-page document, which The Epoch Times newspaper has seen. Nearly 2.5 million people had to be treated by a doctor after being injected and this only concerns the vaccination victims until the end of 2021.

Curiously, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, the German vaccine authority, stated that fewer than 250,000 “suspected cases of side effects” had been reported as of December 31. That is less than a tenth of the number mentioned in the KBV report.

Sichert, health care spokesperson for AfD, spoke of a scandal. “If almost 2.5 million people have visited a doctor after a Corona vaccination, then that must be made public. This must have consequences.”

The MP demanded that doctors and patients be informed about this risk in the future. He said that the government should pay for all the damage associated with their forced vaccination campaign. If out of 60 million vaccinated, 2.5 million (4.2 percent) need treatment for side effects, then the claim that the vaccine is safe is absolutely false, he stressed.

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.