Mathematical Experts In France Show Pandemic Death Rate Just ‘Average’

ER Editor: All-cause mortality is the benchmark to illustrate a pandemic according to many experts we’ve encountered. A pandemic should show up, therefore, in an unusually high number of deaths for that year. But for many countries, it simply isn’t the case. Here are a couple of charts and numbers from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in the UK:

And this pulled from a UK Column broadcast from December last year:

The French expert cited below, Prof. Bernard Beauzamy, produced an equivalent graph for France from the beginning of 2016-2020 found here:

*translation: Monthly deaths France (INSEE)

********

Experts In France Show Pandemic Death Rate Just ‘Average’

Via Principia Scientific International 

The finding is especially interesting since the Covid-19 plandemic was initially justified by a computer model of epidemics and pandemics by a U.K. university computer modeller. It now seems that one year of full data, which allows comparison to all other years, proves COVID19 did NOT cause an unusual number of deaths.

Below is translated the original French analysis, led by a former top university Math professor. The overall mortality data (all causes combined) for the year 2020 show that the covid epidemic did not have any particular severity.

This mathematical analysis was done by Bernard Beauzamy, head of Société de Calcul Mathématique SA (Mathematical Modelling Corporation of France. )

Professor Bernard Beauzamy writes:

As of 02/20/2021, there are approximately 3,300 intensive care beds occupied (all causes), out of approximately 13,000 existing ones: we are very far from saturation.

There is no indication (let’s not speak of proof!) allowing us to conclude any effectiveness of any of the decisions taken by the government since the beginning: lockdown, social distancing, masks, curfew, etc. All this is entirely devoid of a rational basis and health efficiency. Already in 1910, the astronomer Camille Flammarion had advocated lockdown during the arrival of Halley’s Comet.

This is the first time that we have tried to follow an epidemic in its details: how many people are affected at any given moment, how many positives, how many tests, etc. If we had done this for previous epidemics, we would have references, which is not the case here. The figures published every day by a press hungry for sensation serve to frighten the public.

The government, from the start, wanted to give this epidemic the most anxiety-inducing character possible, by publishing figures taken out of context and by banning existing treatments. This is not an initial error as one might have thought, but a deliberate will whose effects can still be seen today: grotesque, incoherent decisions intended to establish the authority of the government and to harm economic activity.

The various institutions responsible for limiting the powers of government (Parliament, Council of State, etc.) accepted the decisions taken, even though they were scientifically unfounded. This attitude still persists today and, except for popular revolt, we do not see how, in the near future, we could get out of the absurd “state of health emergency” in which we are today legally locked up.

The full list of our publications on these issues is available here:

http://www.scmsa.eu/archives/SCM_Coronavirus.pdf

The above is translated from the original French by Google Translate.

****

Les données de mortalité globale (toutes causes confondues) pour l’année 2020 montrent que l’épidémie de covid n’a eu aucune sévérité particulière.

Il y a, au 20/02/2021, environ 3 300 lits de réanimation occupés (toutes causes confondues), pour environ 13 000 existants : on est très loin de la saturation.

Il n’existe aucune indication (ne parlons pas de preuve !) permettant de conclure à une quelconque efficacité de l’une quelconque des décisions prises par le gouvernement depuis le début : confinement, distanciation sociale, masques, couvre-feu, etc. Tout ceci est entièrement dépourvu de base rationnelle et d’efficacité sanitaire. Déjà en 1910 l’astronome Camille Flammarion avait prôné le confinement lors de la venue de la Comète de Halley.

C’est la première fois que l’on s’efforce de suivre une épidémie dans ses détails : combien de personnes atteintes à chaque instant, combien de positifs, combien de tests, etc. Si on l’avait fait pour les épidémies précédentes, on disposerait de références, ce qui n’est pas le cas. Les chiffres publiés chaque jour par une presse avide de sensations servent à effrayer le public.

Le gouvernement, depuis le début, a voulu donner à cette épidémie le caractère le plus anxiogène possible, en publiant des chiffres sortis de leur contexte et en interdisant les traitements existants. Il s’agit là, non pas d’une erreur initiale comme on a pu le croire, mais d’une volonté délibérée dont on constate les effets aujourd’hui encore : décisions grotesques, incohérentes, destinées à asseoir l’autorité du gouvernement et à nuire à l’activité économique.

Les différentes institutions qui sont chargées de limiter les pouvoirs du gouvernement (Parlement, Conseil d’Etat, etc.) ont accepté les décisions prises, quand bien même elles étaient scientifiquement dépourvues de fondement. Cette attitude persiste encore aujourd’hui et, sauf révolte populaire, on ne voit pas comment, dans un futur proche, nous pourrions sortir de l’absurde “état d’urgence sanitaire” où nous sommes aujourd’hui légalement enfermés.

La liste complète de nos publications sur ces questions est disponible ici :

http://www.scmsa.eu/archives/SCM_Coronavirus.pdf

More at budbromley.blog

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*