INSEE Shows Vaccination Has Gone Hand in Hand With an Increase in Mortality Among People Under 65

ER Editor: INSEE is France’s government-run institute for studies in statistics and economics.


When INSEE shows that vaccination has gone hand in hand with an increase in mortality among people under 65

Did vaccination really save lives, as the government claims? As the propaganda broadcast over and over last year said, the figures are indisputable… and, when we look at the INSEE figures, it becomes indisputable that, not only has vaccination not reduced mortality , but even that it went hand in hand with its increase in the under-65s. Embarrassed, INSEE wonders why. We have our idea on the subject…

Figure 6 – Gap between deaths observed and expected by page in 2020 and 2021

Officially, therefore, the vaccine saves lives because it prevents severe forms of COVID. Statistically, this assertion poses a real problem since the figures show that the vaccination campaign was accompanied by an increase in mortalityas shown by INSEE in a very striking document .

While, in 2020, there was a difference of 3% between expected deaths and deaths observed among 35-54 year olds, this difference has more than doubled, approaching 7% in 2021.

The figure is even more frightening for those under 35, where, in 2020, there were fewer actual deaths than expected… whereas, in 2021, the deaths observed were 1% higher than the expected deaths.

In other words, COVID had a beneficial effect on those under 35 in 2020, but there is every indication that vaccination produces a mortality shock in this age group.

It will be seen that the mortality observed in 2021 is higher than the expected mortality in all age groups, up to 85 years of age.

How INSEE explains the drop in mortality among the over 85s

To explain this phenomenon of lower mortality among those over 85, INSEE takes great care, in passing, not to invoke vaccination unilaterally.

Excess mortality, on the other hand, clearly decreases for those aged 85 or over, with the number of deaths even becoming in line with that expected for those aged 95 or over. The “harvest” effect is stronger in the short term for the very old, because their probability of dying a few months later in the absence of an epidemic is greater.

The improvement in the mortality of the over 85s in 2021 is therefore explained first of all by the “harvest effect”, that is to say by the massive deaths of the most fragile in 2020… who left alive the strongest.

It should therefore be noted that, unlike official propaganda, INSEE does not comment on the demographic benefits of vaccination which is, in itself, the mark of the doubt that has taken hold of people’s minds.

The embarrassed silence of INSEE on the damage of vaccination

But the most croquignol is still due to the embarrassed formulations of the INSEE to explain the excess mortality of the youngest by vaccination time:

From August to December 2021, the gap between observed and expected deaths has however become greater than deaths linked to Covid-19. This could be explained by a drop in deaths avoided and/or by an increase in deaths indirectly linked to the epidemic (due, for example, to the postponement of operations).

Admittedly, INSEE continues to explain that:

In 2021, mortality was influenced both downwards and upwards. Vaccination is one of the factors that has reduced the death rate from Covid-19: for example, in October 2021, among those aged 20 or over, this rate is nine times lower for fully vaccinated people than for those not vaccinated [ Drees, 2021 ]. In addition, after a sharp increase in deaths in 2020, mortality fell as a result in 2021, since many frail people had already died. This “harvest” effect therefore contributed to reducing all-cause mortality.

Therefore, the French public authorities are able to precisely calculate the mortality rate of vaccinees due to COVID. But they find no explanation why fewer young people died from COVID after the vaccine, but far more died from other causes.

Weird, right?

COVID, how many deaths exactly?

For the rest, and in a very revealing way, INSEE persists in qualifying the official figures on the number of deaths from COVID. We already discussed this issue last year.

Thus, INSEE writes this:

From March 2020 to December 2021, the deaths observed were significantly higher than those expected in the absence of a Covid-19 epidemic. This excess of deaths from all causes combined (+95,000) is lower than the number of deaths attributable to Covid-19, estimated at between 130,000 and 146,000. The number of deaths linked to Covid-19 in fact includes the deaths of people frail who would have died even without the epidemic in 2020 or 2021.

These figures are worth recalling. The government has been known to systematically inflate COVID mortality by systematically attributing the deaths of polymorbid people to COVID, when detected, even if the death was due to a cause (cancer or heart attack for example). This strategy made it possible to artificially inflate the fear of the disease by dramatizing its consequences.

Even behind these propaganda figures intended to justify draconian measures, the reality is undoubtedly that COVID has not killed more than 95,000 people in two years, i.e. less than 50,000 per year, a figure already mentioned by Santé Publique France last year.

And now the time has come to count the vaccine deaths, despite the stubborn official silence on the phenomenon.




The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.