ER Editor: It hardly needs to be said that we put zero trust in any figures the French government gives as to how many people have been vaccinated thus far. Nor that new ‘waves’ are going to arise from those with decent immune systems, who have not fallen for the vaccine hype. Natural immunity, anyone?
What is expected to happen, however, is that some of those already vaccinated may quickly fall sick and die from pathogenic priming when the natural virus comes around again.
********
Véran unrolls the compulsory vaccination agenda
ERIC VERHAEGHE
The agenda of compulsory vaccination is following its course. While authoritarian measures, such as the QR Code in restaurants or the health pass in discotheques, seem to have failed miserably on the wall of popular indifference, a media campaign is starting to try to save what can still be saved from the fantasy of social control on the occasion of COVID: compulsory vaccination. Health Minister Véran has started to unfold his agenda for the fall.
***
The compulsory vaccination agenda has been launched, even if no one knows how far the indifference of the French to these coercive measures will let it go. Olivier Véran took it a step further yesterday by announcing compulsory vaccination for health care workers in September.
The agenda of compulsory vaccination follows its course
Monday was not only the day after a disastrous election for the majority party. It was also the day when Olivier Véran sent a letter to the directors of EHPAD announcing that the vaccination of their staff would be mandatory from September if the vaccination rate did not exceed 80% in this category of population. Only 55% of the staff would be vaccinated today.
In practice, this 80% figure is difficult to understand. Indeed, it aims at the vaccination of all EHPAD staff. But these are scattered and, even with 80% of the caregivers vaccinated, some establishments could have lower rates.
It is clear here that the government has, in fact, put its finger on the mechanism of mandatory vaccination of caregivers, and that this will be decided in the autumn. In doing so, Véran subscribes to the proposals of the National Academy of Medicine issued a month ago, and which we had dissected in the video below.
The issue of mandatory vaccination returns
At the same time, the health authorities are starting a real campaign to influence the agenda of compulsory vaccination.
On Monday, the Pasteur Institute published a study showing that non-vaccinated people contributed more than others to the spread of the virus. The conclusion of the paper is simple:
Of all the measures studied, vaccinating the unvaccinated remains the most effective approach to controlling the epidemic.
In other words, without mandatory vaccination, there will be a 4th wave.
The next day, Santé Publique France published the figures of the first vaccination. 33.5 million French people have now received a first dose of vaccine. Glass half empty, glass half full… There is still half of French people to vaccinate.
The recording of the non-vaccinated begins
The pressure is therefore beginning to be felt on the small population of non-vaccinated people who have not yet converted to the new dominant religion. Evangelization should not be long in coming!
Thus, it seems that “general practitioners” have asked to have the list of their non-vaccinated patients to contact them. Which general practitioners? Nobody seems to know, but the Minister of Health has nevertheless guaranteed them access to these lists.
We have been asking for patient lists for a long time: to vaccinate against the flu, to screen for breast or colon cancer… Each time, we were told that the National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties would not authorize it. Now, we will finally get our way.
This sentence from a representative of the CSMF, one of the general practitioners’ unions, says a lot about the opportunity that COVID offers to trample on the protection of individual data that the CNIL has provided until now.
Faced with such a denial of democracy, one can only wonder about the instrumentalization of the COVID by the advocates of a massive control of the population, in defiance of individual liberties.
************
Source
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
