Former German Chancellor Says U.S.-EU Alliance Could Now End

ER Editor: Readers may also be interested in this short piece (‘clean energy’/anti-Russia warning) titled U.S. Nord Stream 2 sanctions encroachment on EU sovereignty – German officials, experts.

A French article referencing the Handeslblatt article cited below, offers this:

According to the Handelsblatt article, Schroeder spoke at a public hearing of the Bundestag’s Committee on Economics and Energy yesterday, 1 July. The newspaper quotes excerpts from what would have been his forthcoming statement.

The meeting will be devoted to the energy sovereignty of Europe and Germany, including the Nord Stream 2 discussion.

Schroeder’s statement stated that the sanctions bill, which is currently being debated in the US Congress, is “a widespread and unjustified attack on the European economy and an unacceptable interference in the EU’s sovereignty and energy security in Western Europe”.

Schroeder is chairman of the shareholders’ committee of Nord Stream AG, which is building the Gazprom pipeline.

According to him, the sanctions will directly affect more than 120 companies in the fields of shipbuilding, engineering, environmental protection and security, which are or have been working with Nord Stream 2.

“For each of these companies, there are European jobs at risk,” he said.

According to Schroeder, the adoption of new restrictive measures against the pipeline will be followed by significant financial losses.

In particular, he estimates that investments in European infrastructure amounting to €12 billion will be at risk and that European consumers will face additional costs of up to €4 billion per year.

********

Former German Chancellor Says U.S.-EU Alliance Could Now End

ERIC ZUESSE

Originally posted at The Saker
.
A German equivalent to UK’s Financial Times and America’s Wall Street Journal is the Dusseldorf Handelsblatt or “Commerce Sheet,” which headlined on June 30th, “Former Chancellor Schröder: USA Ending Transatlantic Partnership”.
.
They reported:
Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder has condemned possible new US sanctions against the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline as “deliberate termination of the transatlantic partnership.” A draft law currently under discussion in the US Congress is “a widespread, unjustified attack on the European economy and an unacceptable interference with EU sovereignty and the energy security of Western Europe,” Schröder writes in his statement for a public hearing of the Economic Committee scheduled for Wednesday in the Bundestag
The article closes:
Schröder sees the relations with the USA as “heavily burdened” by “escalating tariffs and going it alone” policy by the Americans. Schröder writes: “Economic fines against a NATO ally during the current economic recession are nothing other than a deliberate termination of the transatlantic partnership.
This is as if Jimmy Carter or Barack Obama were to say that EU policymakers had a trade policy toward the U.S. that is so hostile and uncooperative that, in order to comply with it, the U.S. would have to subordinate itself to the EU and lose some of its own sovereignty, and as if he were to tell the U.S. Congress that for them to okay the EU’s demands in this matter would be “nothing other than a termination of the transatlantic partnership.”
.
Congress has not yet passed this legislation (new economic sanctions legislation that is co-sponsored in the U.S. Senate by Republican Ted Cruz and Democrat Jeanne Shaheen) but it (“S.1441 – Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019”) enjoys strong bipartisan support and has been considered almost certain to be passed in both houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump.  It is not a partisan issue in the United States.
.
Neither is it partisan in Germany. Both of Germany’s main political Parties (Schröder being SPD) strongly support the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline, which will be considerably more economical for supplying natural gas to the EU than would be the U.S. Government’s demand that American shipped fracked liquified natural gas be used, instead of Russian pipelined natural gas, in Europe. Though this U.S. legislative initiative is called “Protecting Europe’s Energy Security,” its overwhelming support in the U.S. Congress is instead actually for protecting U.S. fracking corporations. The bill’s title is only for ‘patriotic’ propaganda purposes (which is the typical way that legislation is named in the United States — as a sales device, so as to sound acceptable not only to the billionaires who fund the Parties but also to the voters on election day).
.
Both of America’s political Parties are significantly funded by America’s domestic producers of fracked gas. One of the few proud achievements of U.S. President Obama that has been proudly continued by President Trump has been their boosting U.S. energy production, largely fracked gas, so as to reduce America’s foreign-trade deficit. However, if this control over the U.S. Government by frackers continues, then there now exists a strong possibility, or even a likelihood, that the transatlantic alliance will end, as a result. 
************

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.