
ER Editor: First, a few relevant tweets connected to the topic of downed Russian helicopters on Russian territory near Bryansk: 9 pilots lost. And the certainty of Russian retaliation —
Retaliation
Russian military attacked Ternopil and Petropavlovka with high-precision weapons
The Russian Armed Forces delivered a strike with high-precision weapons at the points of deployment of units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and at the places of storage of ammunition, weapons and… pic.twitter.com/v3xWsfMVvw— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 14, 2023
Weapons Used to Bring Down Helicopters?
Ukraine received 200 Storm Shadow missiles from Britain in the first batch, in the second phase they should receive another 400 missiles. Now the Armed Forces of Ukraine are testing missiles against targets on the frontline, and data on the strikes are transmitted by Western…
— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 14, 2023
More retaliation
During the night, the Russian space forces carried out missile strikes on the west of Ukraine, with a special focus on Ternopil, where there is a logistics hub for the reception of Western military equipment. The industrial zone in this city was particularly affected, which…
— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 14, 2023
In Khmelnitsky, after the strike of the Russian Aerospace Forces, the ammunition for the Leopard and Marder tanks was destroyed. There was also a cargo from Denmark, Germany, Italy and Japan for €200-220 million
Also, in addition to ammunition, €83 million worth of satellite… pic.twitter.com/AmVB85nZmo— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 14, 2023
The Washington Post reports that Zelenskiy planned to seize Russian border towns and strike deep into Russian territory to gain a bargaining chip in future negotiations with Russia.
It is interesting that the article in WP comes out in parallel with the events in the Bryansk… pic.twitter.com/tC5vCChXS1
— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 13, 2023
According to information, the value of the ammunition destroyed in the Khmelnytsky ammunition depot is about 500 million dollars. pic.twitter.com/J0f0g4x5cx
— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 13, 2023
Arrivals in Ternopil and here are very successful in everything
It is reported that a significant part of the military aid sent by Western countries is concentrated in this region of Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/SFFKA5G1zC
— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 13, 2023
DOWNED RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS USED FOR ANTI-ELECTRONIC COMBAT
Two Mi-8 MTPR-1 helicopters, which were shot down today over Bryansk, had equipment for jamming and anti-electronic warfare
The “Richag-AV” system was installed on them, which serves to jam radar and air defense systems.…— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 13, 2023
Residents of the city of Klintsy carry flowers in memory of the dead pilots. pic.twitter.com/LKrMKqyfgB
— Spriter (@Spriter99880) May 13, 2023
AMBUSH OF RUSSIAN SPECIAL AIR GROUP LIKELY TO SPAWN MAJOR ESCALATION IN RUSSIA’S WAR WITH UKRAINE AND NATO
LARRY JOHNSON
A black and dangerous day for the Russian air operations in Ukraine. A Russian Special Air Group was ambushed, causing the deaths of at least 9 pilots.

Simplicius tells the tale:
Today Russia lost two Mi-8s, and Su-34, and reportedly an Su-35. All nine pilots were killed. This is likely three in the Mi-8, three in the Mi-8MTPR1 (pilot, copilot and EW suite operator), two in Su-34, and one in Su-35.
These four aerial assets comprised what’s called a ‘special air group’ as they operated together as one unit on a coordinated mission objective. One of the Mi-8s was likely in a recovery role, specifically sent as a craft to recover downed pilots as a precaution, the other was an advanced Mi-8MTPR1, which is an electronics / EW platform. The role of the Mi-8MTPR1 is to provide electronic jamming and cover for the Su-34, whose role was to launch airstrikes, likely in the form of the new FAB-500M-62 UMPC ‘planning’ or glide-bombs. The Su-35’s role in this special air group is to provide air cover against potential hostile air threats, i.e. enemy fighter jets.
… (ER: extra quotes added)
So, in summary: they fly together, the Mi-8MTPR1 jams enemy air defenses from a distance, the Su-34 launches bombs, the Su-35 patrols to make sure no hostile craft approach, and the rear Mi-8 simply loiters as precaution to exfiltrate any downed pilots swiftly should a shoot down occur.
…
This incident in fact gave us the first such indepth look into how Russia is launching its long range strikes. It’s more sophisticated than many people thought, and doesn’t boil down to just Su-34s randomly winging bombs on their own, but in fact there is an entire system of cover in place.
So, the big question is, what went wrong? If these Rychag units are supposed to jam AD, then what exactly happened?
…
In the end, it is an unprecedented strike because it is the downing of an entire air group in Russian territory. And fairly deep in their territory to boot. As one analyst wrote, “next they will just be shooting them down straight in Sheremetyevo airport.”
…
As of this writing, Russian strategic aviation (bombers) are taking off for what is likely to be retaliatory strikes. We’ll update next time as more information becomes known.
I do not know if the article is behind a pay wall (ER: it doesn’t seem to be), but it provides a very detailed analysis of what may have happened. Bottomline — the Russians are not sure how this aerial ambush was carried out. This is clearly a tactical black eye for the Russians. It does not change the trajectory of Ukraine’s ultimate defeat, but it is likely to lead to a significant escalation in Russian attacks on NATO ISR assets at a minimum. Until now, the Russians largely have avoided attacking U.S./NATO targets. I think that is now at an end.
It is not just the attack on the “Special Air Group.” The Ukrainians also launched two British Storm Shadow cruise missiles on civilian targets in Luhansk (ER: See this by Readovka – browsers will translate). I think the combination of these two events will lead to a change in Russian tactics. Patience in responding to Western-backed terrorist attacks is likely at an end.
The Russian response to the NATO-backed escalation carries a significant risk of widening the war into a full blown war with NATO. To quote Thomas Paul Anderson’s movie, “There Will Be Blood.”
Source
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply