ER Editor: Another aspect of the widespread, barely plausible weirdness we’re being subjected to – UK bank accounts being closed for not having the right opinions. Nigel Farage (see his first tweet) was the most recent victim, someone high profile enough to raise awareness of the problem. Apparently, nine banks have refused to give him a new account. Neil Oliver briefly discusses the implications of a ‘social credit’ system this this type of closure portends, followed by Farage and Andrew Bridgen:
‘It’s social murder that banks are taking the step of cutting people off from modern life in this way.’
Neil Oliver warns that the UK is seeing rising ‘social credit’, after Nigel Farage has had a ninth bank reject him in what he claims is an establishment plot against him. pic.twitter.com/kuLP77jNZX
— GB News (@GBNEWS) July 3, 2023
Just to keep people up to date… I have just had the 9th bank rejection confirmed.
Maybe I need to go to law and fight this for the sake of so many people.
I don’t want to live in communist China.
— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) July 3, 2023
🚨I put in for an Urgent Question in Parliament today:-
The cancellation of @Nigel_Farage ‘s bank accounts! Will the Government make a statement.
Despite all the media and public discussion of this issue why was my question not accepted.
I can’t understand why my UQ was…
— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) July 3, 2023
Many thanks to David Davis for the support in Parliament today. pic.twitter.com/SfQN7dAHiS
— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) July 3, 2023
Check out this Mail Online report from yesterday, which reveals that financial institutions both high and low are engaging in this new variation of cancel culture —
Banks face probe into ‘chilling’ account closures: Storm grows over accounts shut for political reasons following Nigel Farage row
Government Tells Banks to Uphold Free Speech as Blacklisting Scandal Deepens
Banks are to be told by the Treasury that they must protect free speech amid an escalating scandal involving the blacklisting of customers who hold views that are deemed verboten among corporate elites. The Telegraph has the story.
Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor, is understood to be “deeply concerned” that overzealous lenders are closing down accounts because they disagree with customers’ opinions and has asked City minister Andrew Griffith to investigate the issue.
Whitehall sources said that results of a consultation on the subject will be published within weeks, after it was launched earlier this year in the wake of PayPal blocking the accounts of free speech groups.
The controversy flared up again last week after the leading Brexiteer Nigel Farage revealed his account had been closed by his bank. A vicar was also dropped as a customer after criticising his lender’s stance on LBGTQ+.
The Treasury is poised to recommend a more rigid notice period if payment providers, including high street lenders, want to close a customer’s account as well as requiring banks to provide more information about why they have decided to shut accounts. Regulators will be able to take action against banks that break the rules.
Officials believe that the recommendations can curb excessive behaviour by banks.
A senior Treasury source said: “It is absolutely a concern. No one should have their bank account denied on the grounds of freedom of expression. We expect to take action on this issue within weeks.”
Ministers are increasingly worried that there is a trend of closures affecting customers who hold controversial [sic] political views.
Mr. Farage last week said his bank accounts were closed “without explanation” and other high street lenders refused to allow him to transfer his funds to them.
Anglican vicar Reverend Richard Fothergill claimed that his Yorkshire Building Society account was shuttered days after writing to the bank to complain about its public messaging during Pride month.
A spokesman for Yorkshire Building Society said the company never closes accounts based on different opinions or beliefs, adding an account was only ever closed if a customer is “rude, abusive, violent or discriminates in any way”.
Government sources stressed that even people with extreme views should be entitled to hold a bank account if they have not broken the law.
The Treasury source added: “Banks and payment providers occupy a privileged place in society and it would be a concern if financial services were being denied to those exercising the right to lawful free speech.” …
Treasury ministers last week responded to concerns raised by Conservative MPs about customers who convey minority views having their accounts closed.
It came after Mr. Farage said his personal and business accounts with a major retail bank were closed because of a “commercial decision”, and other high street lenders have refused to allow him to transfer his funds to them.
Several former Brexit Party MEPs have also said their bank accounts were shut after they were elected to the European Parliament.
Meanwhile, in June, Barclays was forced to pay over £20,000 compensation to Christian ministry groups, after closing their accounts due to pressure from LGBTQ+ activists, who were concerned about conversion therapy practices.
The Treasury has also given the City watchdog ‘marching orders’ to review the operation of its politically exposed persons (PEPs) regime amid concerns that its application has been heavy handed.
Toby told the Telegraph:
I’m pleased this issue is on Jeremy Hunt’s radar, but I hope the investigation won’t take too long. There is no doubt that thousands of people are being penalised by banks and payment services providers for exercising their right to lawful free speech.
Indeed, the Free Speech Union has been lobbying the Treasury to change the payment services regulations for the last nine months and submitted reams of evidence about the scale of the problem. Since then, it has only got worse. The Treasury urgently needs to change the regulations to prohibit this new and sinister form of cancel culture.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Amusing tweet from Adrian Hilton.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.