Scholz govt in crisis after budgetary manoeuvre to shift 60bn from C19 to Climate

ER Editor: Peter Halligan also picks up this story. See —

Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court denies the ruling coalition government its plan to switch €60 billion unused C19 funds into “climate change funds” – government collapse and early elections???

Of note:

A cynic (like me) would say that the plan to switch the C19 funds to climate change “net zero” project funds was always the intention – as it fits with the declaration of the next Public Health Emergency of International Concern – CLIMATE CHANGE!!! – to be declared sometime over  2024/2025. The coalition Government thought no-one would kick up a fuss. Luckily for Germany an opposition party – the CDU – cried “foul”


Ampeldämmerung: Scholz government in crisis after doubtful budgetary manoeuvre to pay for Green climate fantasies with unused Covid funds is declared unconstitutional

Minister of Economic Affairs Robert Habeck (Greens), Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) and Finance Minister Christian Lindner (FDP) looking dazed and confused and not saying very much after hearing that their budgetary trick will not work and they have no money for their stupid climate schemes.

Somehow – and this is quite an incredible thing to type – the CDU/CSU and SPD managed not to spend this money, leaving the 60 billion Euro credit authorisation floating about as a tantalising possibility when the clown car known as the Scholz coalition came to power five months later.

In 2022, they decided to use this 60 billion Euros to top off their Climate and Transformation Fund (KTF). This money would help us “transition towards a climate-friendly economy,” “expand electromobility and heating networks,” “promote the replacement of climate-damaging heating systems,” “modernise Deutsche Bahn” and also subsidise various industries. While the KTF is supposed to be funded by CO2 tariffs, the enormous revenues these generate aren’t enough to pay for all the crazy stuff our climate protectors want to do, so they poured the 60 billion into the pot, enlarging it by almost 40%.

The CDU, now in the opposition, were not happy at the redirection of their Covid credit, and they sued, arguing that the manoeuvre constituted a violation of the debt ceiling and therefore of the German constitution. This made Green Economics Minister Robert Habeck very angry and also nervous. In June, when the lawsuit was still pending, he whined as follows in the Bundestag:

We are facing challenges in energy-intensive industries: steel, chemicals and plastics. And here again, I would say the fact that the CDU/CSU is now taking legal action against the funds that have been reserved for this is damaging to our country and it will hurt our heating reforms. In fact, this would mean pulling out from under us the floor on which we are trying to stabilise the economic situation in Germany.

Well, today Habeck’s worst fears were realised. The Federal Constitutional Court have declared the supplementary budget from 2021 null and void, plunging Scholz and his fellow idiots into serious political crisis.

From t-online:

There is now a gap in the federal budget so large that extra savings measures cannot close it.

The exact consequences are hard to estimate. Most likely, however, Germany is facing a government crisis the likes of which the coalition has never seen before.

If the government does not want to cancel [all of its insane environmental spending] … it will have to reallocate money on a grand scale. The task is almost impossible given the already-tight budget.

The leadership … have all played their part: Christian Lindner (FDP), who invented the sleight of hand in the first place as the newly appointed Finance Minister,1 Robert Habeck (Greens), who pushed for it the hardest in view of his climate projects, and Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD), who agreed to the whole thing …

Governments have collapsed over less. Financially, as harsh as it sounds, the coalition is dead now. Politically, it has hit a brick wall.

If the government survives this catastrophe, if it holds together until the end of the legislative period, it will only be because the alternatives are worse for everyone involved.

All of this sounds boring, I know, but let me explain why they’re in so much trouble: The Scholz coalition is not only unpopular, having absolutely destroyed polling for all three parties involved, but also very fragile. The liberal FDP have repeatedly pledged to oppose increased taxation, while the Greens have been eager to realise their wildly expensive climate schemes, all in the aftermath of the ruinous pandemic and the energy crisis. Spending on credit was the way they hoped to square the circle, and now they’re not allowed to do that. Their precious and deeply stupid Climate and Transformation Fund is in chaos.

All potential solutions seem unpromising. The government could try to declare a new emergency to evade the debt ceiling, but I doubt the courts will permit this, as there is no emergency pending. Had the leadership been less stupid, they could’ve tried this last year when the Ukraine war broke out, but it sounds odd to decide that this was a crisis necessitating special budgetary provisions 19 months after the fact. The SPD and the Greens will want to get around the debt ceiling via constitutional amendment, but that would require a two-thirds vote of the Bundestag and therefore CDU cooperation. Seeing as the CDU sued to put the government in this crisis, it’s hard to see why they’d help them get out of it. Alternatively, Scholz and company could try to raise taxes to cover the shortfall, but this would be political suicide for their battered junior FDP partners, who have pledged to stop tax hikes.

I suspect the government will limp along in a stricken state until 2025, but it’s not inconceivable that the coalition collapses. In that case, the SPD could try to partner with the centre-right CDU/CSU instead, although that seems unlikely for many reasons. New elections are just as hard to imagine; they would probably see the FDP out of the Bundestag for failing to meet the 5% minimum hurdle and bring the CDU to power.


1 I don’t think this is right. Lindner agreed, but Welt reports the scheme was dreamed up by Scholz and his former finance minister Werner Gatzer.




The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.