Neonatal Deaths in Vaccinated Mothers 28% Greater, UK Study Reveals Accidentally

Neonatal Deaths in Vaccinated Mothers 28% Greater, UK Study Reveals Accidentally

They were trying to prove that Covid vaccine is “safe and effective”

IGOR CHUDOV

new study was published in the British Medical Journal. Working for the UK government, its authors set out to prove that COVID vaccines were safe in pregnancy. However, some findings are disturbing and point at the opposite.

Vaccines Do Cause COVID-19, Sort of

The first finding, to get us started, is that COVID-vaccinated mothers had MORE COVID-19 than the unvaccinated mothers.

The vaccines, supposedly designed to prevent infection, caused vaccinated pregnant women to have more illnesses:

15% of vaccinated pregnant women had COVID-19, whereas only 12% of unvaccinated pregnant women had it.

The study completely glosses over this inconvenient fact, of course.

A side note: the above 12% and 15% numbers may include incidences of COVID during pregnancy that happened BEFORE some women were vaccinated. That would make the vaccine comparison even worse because all pregnant women were in the same position – unvaccinated – before some of them got vaccinated, and vaccination made the vaccinated cohort come out worse by 3%!

We were told that “COVID vaccines do not cause Covid-19”. It is very narrowly true: these vaccines do not contain live viruses. However, the table above shows that vaccines made vaccinated pregnant women more vulnerable to infection post-vaccination.

28% Greater Neonatal Deaths

The saddest part of the report concerns neonatal deaths: deaths of newborns up to 28 days of age.

You can see that the data suggests that neonatal deaths for vaccinated mothers are 27-32% higher than those for unvaccinated mothers.

I want to underscore that the data, while alarming, does not reach the level of statistical significance. Interestingly, as was found in the US CDC report, the higher-dose Moderna vaccine causes MORE neonatal deaths than the lower-dose Pfizer. In the above report, Pfizer is associated with a 32% increase in neonatal deaths, and Moderna with a 37% increase (underlined in blue).

It makes sense that a higher dose of vaccine causes more neonatal deaths.

A similar pattern was found in the CDC’s vaccine report:

Igor’s Newsletter
Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer
Summary CDC’s own presentation shows that being given a higher-dose Moderna vaccine during pregnancy almost DOUBLES the chance of neonatal death, compared to women who received the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine. How can Covid vaccine given during pregnancy be safe and NOT affect infant deaths, if infant death rate for Moderna-inoculated women is double the i…

This chart of neonatal deaths in Scotland corroborates the UK researchers’ data we are discussing, showing an unexplainable increase in neonatal deaths.

Miscarriage Data CENSORED from the Report

The supplementary material contains disappointing statements:

  • All miscarriages (terminations of pregnancy before 24 weeks) were censored (eliminated) from the data
  • Some neonatal deaths or stillbirths were also censored if they did not include a NHS number for the baby. While I am not an expert on the UK birthing procedures, this may include many early neonatal deaths or stillbirths if that number was not assigned before the infant died. Maybe someone can shed light on this in the comments.

The number of total pregnancies included is 514,013 (page 2). The number of pregnancies excluded due to missing NHS numbers for the baby is 88,237. Those are most likely the ones involving spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, etc. Does excluding such pregnancies where the NHS number was not even assigned to the baby skew the data and make it look better for COVID vaccines? You tell me! We cannot be certain, but I am suspicious.

Overall, this pro-vaccine report, revealing very uncomfortable data regarding neonatal deaths, leaves me wishing that the researchers could provide raw data records that they used and included miscarriages. Brian Mowrey also covered this study. Check out his post if you want to see another author’s take.

The disappointing neonatal death findings cause worry but fail to reach statistical significance. And yet, the pro-vaccine authors revealed disturbing information, undoubtedly worth reporting to my readers.

The pregnant UK women were told to vaccinate to save grandmothers and stop the pandemic. Instead, the vaccinated mothers had MORE COVID and had unfortunate outcomes for the newborns.

The UK government published a report with censored miscarriage data and 15% of most problematic pregnancies removed from the data set — that still shows health damage to the infants.

Will they ever release the underlying data?

************

Source

Featured image source: https://www.ama.com.au/gpnn/issue-21-number-22/articles/pregnant-and-breastfeeding-women-encouraged-get-vaccinated

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*