ER Editor: In the current climate, many readers of this type of site would congratulate French MP for Marseille Stephane Ravier for his gumption in speaking out about mass immigration.
Speaking your mind on social media or another medium is not a joke in France, however. Say the ‘wrong’ thing according to the fashion of the day and the authorities will come down on you. And as Jonathan Turley states, while free speech is encoded in the American DNA, it’s not here. Any reasonable, ‘educated’ (a troubling word following the Covid nonsense) person will find their own reason here why someone who said something offensive – in their opinion – should not be allowed to say that thing. Outrage in the listener / audience is encoded in French DNA for the most part. The culture is also very top-down and authoritarian, with an ‘objective’ level of judgement and value part and parcel of the way people naturally think. So if I intolerantly criticize someone’s speech, it’s because my criterion for judgement is ‘correct’. As law professor Turley points out below, the answer to distasteful speech is more speech and better speech, not censorship. More speech is its very own disinfectant, he says.
Ravier is unbowed, thankfully. Here is a recent tweet, where he cites an MSM article (Le Monde no less) where it is discussed how his city of Marseille has a dominant Nigerian gang engaged in various types of criminal activity:
Translation: Thanks to mass immigration, Marseille has become the playground of African mafias. And it’s not going to get any better with the crazy immigrationists who are in charge of the city
Grâce à l’immigration de masse, Marseille est devenue le terrain de jeu de mafias africaines. Et ce n’est pas avec les immigrationnistes fous qui sont à la tête de la ville que ça va s’arranger…https://t.co/CJReOH7rTK
— Stéphane Ravier (@Stephane_Ravier) March 7, 2023
French Politician Faces Criminal Trial For Immigration Criticism
We have previously discussed the alarming rollback on free speech rights in the West, particularly in France (here and here and here and here and here and here and here). The latest such case is a criminal trial of French Senator Stéphane Ravier for stating that “immigration kills the youth of France.”
It is another example of why free speech is in a virtual free fall in Europe.
Ravier faces trial tomorrow (Thursday, March 9) in the criminal court of Marseilles on charges of incitement to discrimination, hatred, or violence. The case is based on a tweet, on January 11, 2022, in which Ravier reacted to the murder of a teen in Paris by a 62-year-old man from Senegal.
He tweeted “Theo, 18 years old, murdered yesterday by a Senegalese [migrant]… Immigration kills the youth of France.”
A complaint was filed by the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (Licra) and the League for Human Rights (LDH) against Ravier over allegations of spreading hatred toward migrants.
Alain Lothe also alleged that by publishing his tweet, “the elected official is not content to react to a news event but wants to highlight the nationality of its author and to involve all people from immigrant backgrounds.”
It is another example of criminalizing political speech. Just last year, Ravier was convicted for another comment made against a female socialist senator that was deemed to be sexist and given a fine of 1,500 euros. (ER: This was later dropped on appeal.)
France has been a leader in the rollback on free speech in the West with ever widening laws curtailing free speech. These laws criminalize speech under vague standards referring to “inciting” or “intimidating” others based on race or religion. For example, fashion designer John Galliano has been found guilty in a French court on charges of making anti-Semitic comments against at least three people in a Paris bar. At his sentencing, Judge Anne Marie Sauteraud read out a list of the bad words used by Galliano to Geraldine Bloch and Philippe Virgitti. “He said ‘dirty whore’ at least a thousand times,” she explained out loud.
In another case, the father of French conservative presidential candidate Marine Le Pen was fined because he had called people from the Roma minority “smelly.” A French mother was prosecuted because her son went to school with a shirt reading “I am a bomb.”
A French teenager was charged for criticizing Islam as a “religion of hate.”
I wrote earlier about the prosecution of famous actress Brigitte Bardot for saying in 2006 that Muslims were ruining France in a letter to then-Interior Minister (and later President) Nicolas Sarkozy. Bardot, an animal rights activist, has been repeatedly hit with such criminal complaints for criticizing different groups. She was later fined for calling the the inhabitants of La Reunion “savages” for their continued sacrificing of animals in religious rituals.
In this case, a politician is speaking about a matter of national importance. One can certainly object and rebut such views or heated rhetoric. The solution to bad speech is better speech. Free speech is its own disinfectant.
Instead of engaging in such debates, however, various individuals and groups now seek to silence their opponents by criminalizing speech. France has led this anti-speech movement. The sad irony of France leading efforts to curb free speech is powerful. Once the bastion of liberty, France has now become one of the greatest international threats to free speech.
Featured image, Stephane Ravier: Communiqué de presse / Stéphane Ravier
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.