ER Editor: Here we’re doing a two-fer from Manlio Dinucci and Ahmed Adel of InfoBrics on the current state and priorities of the EU military.
Compare Josep Borrell’s (a player in the movie for sure) comments about arming the EU for war against Russia to achieve ‘peace’ (!!!) by buying an expensive truckload of artillery projectiles (!!!) against the actual dismal state of EU military capability reported on below by Adel. Which has been designed over some time to render the EU a military basket case, dependent on the US deep state.
The EU poodle sitting up and begging to the US is a theme that’s being continued, as well as the EU ‘leadership’ draining dry taxpayer coffers to no productive end.
We insist on the theme of ‘it’s a movie’ because Jens Stoltenberg recently came out and revealed some shocking truths about the Ukraine situation, that nobody in his right professional mind would have said, just like Merkel and Hollande on the Minsk Accords. See —
NATO Chief Admits: “War Didn’t Start In February Last Year, The War Started In 2014”
********
The EU is emptying the arsenals… to fill the arsenals
MANLIO DINUCCI
The European Union is engulfed in the United States’ support plan for Ukraine. It develops its armament production solely for this purpose. In fact, it engages in the war against the Russian Federation. However, it has never debated this objective.
The Defense Ministers of the 27 European countries, meeting in Stockholm, approved the plan – presented by Josep Borrell, High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy – for “the joint purchase of large-scale ammunition caliber”. The Ukrainian Minister of Defense (while Ukraine is not part of the EU), who participated in the meeting. He “explained Ukraine’s military requirements”. Borrell said, “We are in times of war and we have to have, sorry to say (sic), a mentality of war.” He then illustrated the Plan, which foresees three phases:
1) Draw artillery projectiles, in particular 155 mm, from the reserves of EU member states and immediately supply them to Ukraine. The money comes from the “European Peace Facility” (EPF) fund, which has already earmarked 3.6 billion euros for this purpose (paid by European citizens).
2) Achieve an Agreement between the 27 EU Member States for the joint purchase of 155 mm projectiles (by the EU Defense Agency, ndt), by signing the first contracts for a period of seven years. This is a “massive order” both to program and increase national reserves and to guarantee supplies to Ukraine.
3) Ensure the long-term increase in ammunition production in Europe, supporting the defense industry to guarantee supplies to Ukraine over the long term. (The EU plans to supply it with about a million artillery projectiles).
ER: Artillery projectiles? It’s clear to us as non-military people that all this will achieve nothing except to drain EU taxpayer coffers even more and feed the defense industry. Hypersonic-supplied Russia, whose arms-production is currently ramped up, must be surely laughing. It’s just an excuse for a massive transfer of taxpayer money.
Borrell further communicated that “by the end of March, our Military Assistance Mission will have trained more than 11,000 Ukrainian soldiers. By the end of the year, we expect to have trained 30,000”. For support to Ukraine, the EU has allocated 18 billion euros (still paid by European citizens).
Josep Borrell summed up the objective of the Plan with these words: “To win the peace, Ukraine must win the war. And that is why we must continue to support Ukraine: to win peace”. The European Union is thus openly going to war against Russia as part of the always dangerous USA-NATO strategy.
ER: We reiterate – it’s a movie, folks.
In Moscow, the assassination of Konstantin Malofeev, managing director of the Tsargrad group, was foiled. This is the same type of attack by a bomb planted under the car as the one by which the journalist Daria Douguine was assassinated in August 2022. It is part of a series of terrorist attacks against journalists and officials of Russian media, carried out by the Ukrainian secret services under the direction of the USA and NATO.
Source
****
Europe’s military is in “appalling state” – experts
AHMED ADEL for INFOBRICS
Western pressure to provide Ukraine with military support has not only exposed the “appalling state” of Europe’s defence capabilities, but has also demonstrated the overreliance that the continent has on the US, Foreign Affairs magazine wrote in a scathing article titled “Why European Defense Still Depends on America: Don’t Believe the Hype—the War in Ukraine Has Led to Little Change.” In addition, the authors believe that the next generation of American politicians will be more consumed by China rather than Russia.
According to the publication, the conflict over Ukraine has exposed the “appalling state of European defense.” This is because European countries “underinvested in its armed forces for the past 20 years, and what little funding it did commit was focused on building forces for humanitarian, counterinsurgency, and counterterrorism missions far from the continent, such as in Afghanistan.”
“European militaries thus lack the basics needed for conventional warfare in their own backyards. Most countries lack basic ammunition stockpiles,” added the authors of the article, Max Bergmann (Director of the Stuart Center and the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies) and Sopia Besch (Europe Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).
As an example, the German Armed Forces only have enough ammunition reserves to last a few hours or days of combat. Spain, like Germany, has more than 300 Leopard tanks, but a third of them are no longer active and in poor condition. In addition, it is Europe’s own fault for having a lack of artilleries due to their decision to empty their stockpiles for the sake of supporting an illiberal Nazi-sympathetic regime in Kiev.
“NATO sets targets that it hopes its member states will meet on their own—and no one explained how the organization would collectively meet such an ambitious goal. And even those European leaders who are determined to support Ukraine and ramp up their own capabilities to deter Russia do not have the kind of arsenals, supply chains, production capacities, and procurement procedures that the task at hand requires,” the article states.
Meanwhile, the European defence industrial base has been depleted – the root cause being low European defence spending. This is compounded by the fact that Europe does not have a common defence market that meets European security needs. The European defence sector is also under pressure because American military industry profits from signing contracts with the EU, meaning that European companies lose out.
European forces also use different equipment from each other, which makes it much more difficult to operate together. (ER: ‘All together, one at a time’.)
The authors highlight that because the Europeans use 29 different destroyers, 17 tanks or personnel carriers, and 20 fighter planes, “yawning gaps” are created and thus it “then falls to the United States to fill these gaps, meaning that European militaries remain dependent on Washington for even the most basic military tasks.” They cite the example that during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, American troops were responsible for airlifting European evacuees.
Beyond highlighting that “European forces are in worse shape than previously thought,” perhaps the most damning conclusion from the authors, and remembering that Bergmann served in a number of positions at the US Department of State (such as a member in the Policy Planning Staff), the EU’s militarization has not been as “transformative” as we are led to believe.
Although European countries are self-sabotaging their own economies to sanction Russia amid skyrocketing energy prices and high inflation; maintain widespread support for Finland’s and Sweden’s admission into NATO; and provide billions in military equipment, the authors believe that “the current spending bonanza might suggest a transformation, [but] it may amount to little if underlying issues plaguing European defense remain unaddressed.”
If the authors are to be believed, “a generational change will eventually come to American politics.” Future generations taking leadership positions in the US will be grown up on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, counterterrorism, and now China – not the Cold War and the Balkan Wars, like President Joe Biden.
The immediate issue is that it means another generation of Russians have grown up experiencing immense American and European racism, othering, and disdain. Although the next generation of American politicians might prioritise their focus on China, and many likely realize the mistake in having hostile relations with Russia, the damage has already been done, especially as Moscow and Beijing continue to deepen their ties, something that the US will find difficult to untangle, particularly as their European partners are in economic and military disarray.
Source
Featured image source: https://epthinktank.eu/2015/03/25/european-defence-cooperation-state-of-play-and-thoughts-on-an-eu-army/
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply