EU Council President Charles Michel features in a White Hat tribunal report

ER Editor: This Real Raw News (RRN) report from March 26, 2024 caught our eye because, to our knowledge, this is the first time a senior European political figure has featured in one of their articles. Our primary interest in this story is Charles Michel, supposedly current President of the European Council and former president of Belgium, not US Attorney General Merrick Garland, the subject of the report. Michel has allegedly appeared as a key witness against Garland, presumably on US soil in a military trial.

(We strongly suspect, and have heard, that the timing of RRN’s reports are deliberately wrong, and that trials of all sorts of people happened long before we are told about them via this site. There could be other details that are embellished, but the bigger context of the site lends credence to this report regarding Garland and Michel. See our other comment below on the reliability of RRN.)

It’s claimed below that Charles Michel is a member of Bilderberg. From this December 2023 The Expose report, we can find Michel’s name below the picture of George Soros. See —

The names & faces of the 150 Bilderbergers who manipulated the COVID-19 Pandemic response

Michel’s name can also be found in this June 2022 report (browsers will translate). This short report from 2015 indicates Michel was particularly selected to attend Bilderberg upon the recommendation of one of its members, over and above his two prime ministerial predecessors.

While the date and timing cannot probably be trusted, we learn from the RRN report below that Michel has already been arrested and tried for espionage, and given a 25 year prison term in exchange for giving up relevant information and appearing as a witness. Michel’s response also indicates that there is a Charles Michel out there who isn’t him. We have suspected for quite some time that a number of EU leaders are no longer at liberty, if still alive. Many famous figures have appeared in public in masks.

Presumably espionage charges relate to sovereign US activities. Could there be any charges against this man in relation to citizens of the EU?


The figure of Michel has been the subject of some bizarre reporting lately.

Earlier this year we noted how Michel had announced he would step down from a top EU job to run as a mere MEP in June’s European elections, long before his term in office would expire in November 2024. Obviously this was absurd —

Could Orban take over the EU Council?

Then he changed his mind and wouldn’t step down after all, because Bad Boy Viktor Orban might have a chance at being interim EU Council President. More absurdity

EU’s Charles Michel Does a U-Turn

Meanwhile, in December of 2023, Michel had approved the axing of 10 million euros for the EU climate fund, earmarked for development of alternative energy sources, a key EU project —

EU green funds are under the guillotine

Michel wasn’t the only one to act bizarrely, change his mind, and scupper EU climate policy. Frans Timmermans acted similarly in stepping down from actually being the EU climate czar, so we wouldn’t be surprised to hear something about him coming up.

From January 2024, deep state mouthpiece (probably now controlled by the white hats) does a phenomenal job of questioning Michel’s professional competence given his about-face —

Let Politico tell us how pointless the EU ‘top people’ are

None of this smelled remotely plausible. But it seems the real Michel wasn’t around to set the record straight.

It isn’t rocket science to suppose other EU leaders, many highly corrupt, have been subject to a similar fate.


It is a standard knee-jerk response to disbelieve whatever RRN puts out. As we said in connection with its recent report on Nuland’s and Kagan’s arrests

The classic defence of RRN is simply to ask, why hasn’t it been shut down by lawyers? See this November 2021 story about George Bush Jr. getting arrested. Here’s the report naming Bush’s lawyer, David Aufhauser. (We’re using the Yandex browser to find these stories. RRN has several on Bush.) A regular Google search for Aufhauser will authenticate the man. While he’s not the only lawyer named on this site, including lawyers working on the military side, we need to ask why Aufhauser hasn’t had the site shut down if the reporting is false. Aufhauser’s had two and a half years to do it.

Journalist Michael Baxter at RRN says

Information on this website is for informational and educational and entertainment purposes. This website contains humor, parody, and satire. We have included this disclaimer for our protection, on the advice on legal counsel.


Merrick Garland Military Tribunal, Day I


The United States Navy Judge Advocates General’s Corps on Friday began but did not conclude the tribunal of Attorney General Merrick Garland, whom the Office of Military Commissions has charged with treason for weaponizing the Justice Department against President Donald J. Trump and the innocent protesters who visited the Capitol peacefully on January 6.

As reported previously, U.S. Special Forces arrested Garland on January 28 in Maryland, following his return to the U.S. from Poland, where he had been cowering and remotely directing the DOJ, hoping patriotic justice wouldn’t chase him overseas. As has been the case with myriad Deep Staters, Garland felt an uncontrollable urge to return to the roost, Washington D.C., and dropped his guard just long enough for White Hats to scoop him up. Once captured, the weaselly man who had often stoically insisted his Justice Department was impartial and equitable, devoid of bias, regressed into a heap of sniveling flesh, bewailing his predicament and asking Jesus to “please kill Donald Trump,” an odd request considering Garland is Jewish.

Garland’s lawless rule led to the wrongful incarceration of numerous patriots, but he couldn’t stomach five minutes behind bars. In pretrial confinement at Camp Delta, Garland had proclaimed his innocence, screaming, “Let me out of here,” while insisting he had only ever enforced the letter of the law, crossed every ‘t,’ and dotted every ‘I.”

JAG, however, contended that Garland bent the law to fit the Deep State’s sinister agenda and, when necessary, invented new rules aimed at eroding the Constitution and depriving citizens of their rights and freedoms. Garland had naturally refuted that allegation during an early interview. According to Garland, he had claimed he was simply an appointed official tasked with punishing felons, among them the J6ers and President Trump.

Vice Admiral Darse E. Crandall’s opening statement at Friday’s tribunal painted Garland not as an administration lackey but a puppet master who pulled Biden’s strings. He contended that while a reclusive Biden hid in his basement, Garland, Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, and the late Lloyd Austin steered the nation toward destruction.

Garland, who had chosen to represent himself, was handcuffed to the defense table and peering over his eyeglasses as the admiral informed the 3-officer panel that JAG wanted Garland to hang for his crimes against America and its people. JAG had advised detainee Garland to display proper courtroom decorum; unruly outbursts would be met with a swift, harsh rebuke.

His opening remarks were succinct: “I am innocent of all charges. President Joseph R. Biden appointed me as Attorney General of the United States. I dispassionately applied equal justice to all and shall be vindicated.”

Admiral Crandall argued that Biden’s naming of Garland attorney general in March 2021 was merely ceremonial and that corporate entities and foreign dignitaries vetted him for the role as early as January 4, 2021. He called his first witness, President of the European Council and Bilderberg member Charles Michel, to the stand.

Real Raw News learned Monday that JAG arrested Michel on espionage charges on February 5. He had agreed to testify at Garland and other Deep Staters’ tribunals in exchange for a 25-year prison sentence. We have no information on his arrest and situation beyond what is described in the rest of this article.

Michel supplied his backstory and academic and work history and identified the defendant by pointing at him.

“Mr. Michel, you’ve met detainee Garland before today, haven’t you?” the admiral queried.

Michel nodded. “Only once.”

Garland straightened in his seat as if an electric charge had passed through him. “This is a set-up; I swear I’ve never met this man in my entire life.”

“Detainee Garland, we’ve discussed this. You can redress the witness once I’m finished,” the admiral said. “Now, Mr. Michel, how and when did you meet the defendant, and what were the circumstances of the meeting.”

“I met Merrick at his house in Maryland to inform him he would likely be the next Attorney General in the United States,” Michel said.

“I’m an educated man, Mr. Michel, but this confounds me, so correct me if I’m wrong. You’re a Belgian citizen. What in the world would give you authority to promise detainee Garland anything?” Admiral Crandall asked.

“I was more a messenger,” Michel replied.

‘Deliver whose message?” the admiral asked. “Who told you to speak to the defendant?”

“I was told on a video call with a man who looked very much like Barack Obama and Jean-Pierre Lacroix,” Michel replied.

Lacroix, a French national, is the under-secretary-general for Peace Operations for the United Nations. (Lacroix is a French diplomat. Here’s his Wikipedia entry, browsers will translate)

“At the same time?” said Admiral Crandall.

“If you mean, were we all on the call simultaneously, the answer is yes,” Michel said.

“Why did you qualify your mention of Obama with ‘looked very much like’?” Admiral Crandall probed.

Michel shrugged. “As I understand things now, based on rumor and innuendo, not any real proof I’ve seen, Barack Obama might have been dead long before that call, and the person perhaps pretending to be him was just some man in a mask. I know there’s a man running around pretending to be me, so why not him, Obama, too.”

“And now, in retrospect, do you not have the same concerns about Lacroix?” the admiral continued.

“Him I’d met before, entirely unrelated. It was the real Lacroix,” Michel said.

The admiral reached for a pitcher of water and poured a glass. “Why Garland? Was there an impetus for wanting him to be Attorney General over anyone else?”

“Because he had the credentials and already hated Donald Trump and Trump’s supporters and political allies. He was the perfect choice. Trump and his people represented a disturbance, you see, a schism in the order of things. Merrick was told he’d be appointed prior to our meeting’; my job was seeing him face to face, getting a read on him, and making sure he understood that Trump was to be put in jail, made ineffective, or even killed,” Michel said.

“You tell an illuminating story, Mr. Michel, in which shadowy foreign figures influence presidential appointments and dictate U.S. policy. It’s all cloak-and-dagger. Besides your word, have you any proof to substantiate your claim?” the admiral said.

“The only physical proof I had is what you already have,” Michel responded.

“Then let’s take a look,” said the admiral. On a large screen he broadcast a recording of Michel’s video call with Obama and Lacroix, whose faces appeared side by side. Obama did most of the talking.

“Mr. Michel, Merrick Garland will be expecting your visit. He understands you are our emissary. We expect you to reiterate our message to him: once confirmed by the Senate, he will use the full weight of the Justice Department to hunt down every insurrectionist at the Capitol. And with the FBI at his disposal, he can once and for all deal with Donald Trump and his family,” Obama enunciated each word slowly.

“And, Monsieur Michel, you report back, let us know if he has trepidations,” Lacroix said.

“We do not expect that to be a problem,” Obama said.

“I understand completely,” Michel said in response.

The admiral faced the panel. “Army Cyber Command evaluated the clip. They say they’re 98% certain the voice is Obama’s, but only 76% the face is really his. But whether or not that’s the real Obama and Lacroix is largely irrelevant. What’s important is whether the defendant agreed to this unnatural union of forces determined to weaponize the DOJ for political gain.”

He continued: “Mr. Michel, what did you personally tell detainee Garland, and what was his response.”

“I told him that both Obama and Biden wanted him as long as he pledged to eliminate Trump. And he told me he planned to do that anyway, that getting rid of Trump and his MAGA would be his capstone achievement,” Michel said.

“Was there any concern, Mr. Michel, among you and your associates that he wouldn’t pass muster. I mean, a president appoints, but the Senate confirms.”

Michel waved his hand dismissively. “Confirmation was a formality. The result was never in doubt, Admiral Crandall.” Michel wore a sinister grin.

“No further questions at this time,” the admiral said. “Detainee Garland, you may cross Mr. Michel.”

Garland cleared his throat. “I’d like to approach the witness.”

“Mr. Michel can hear you just fine from where you’re sitting,” the admiral retorted.

Garland said, “You claim we met at my house. You’re a liar. I’ve never seen you before today.”

“The detainee will not badger or antagonize the witness,” the admiral chimed in. “Consider this your first and final warning, detainee Garland.”

“If, as you claim, we had this imaginary meeting. Where in my house did we meet? Can you describe my home’s interior?”

“Merrick. Remember, when we met, you asked me to call you Merrick, not Mr. Garland. I only saw a hallway and your sitting room. I sat on a burgundy sofa facing a bay window overlooking a dead garden. You were at a desk, oak, if I recall correctly. You were proud of it and said it belonged to your father. Behind you was a bookcase that stretched from wall to wall and floor to ceiling. You grinned at hearing you would have unilateral control of all domestic matters of justice,” Michel said.

Garland appeared uneasy, wobbling on his feet.  “Thi..this is entrapment. You rehearsed this. You, Admiral Crandall, or your people must have raided my house and told this man, whom I’ve never met, what was inside. I’d like a recess and access to a law library please.”

“Well, I’ll grant you that request, detainee Garland, and see you get the books delivered to your cell. This tribunal will resume at 0900 on Monday morning.”

The admiral ordered MPs to escort Garland to his cell and instructed the panelists to not discuss the case among themselves or with anyone else without his explicit instructions.

I am expecting to receive notes on Monday’s proceedings this evening.


Featured image: Kenzo Tribouillard/AFP via Getty Images



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.