ER Editor: We also recommend this short DW piece titled Julian Assange’s extradition hearing begins in London, and this (or pretty much anything else) by Craig Murray titled Roger Waters on Julian Assange, containing video coverage of activities this past weekend on behalf of Assange.
Court proceedings will go ahead through this week, and thereafter will be adjourned until May 18 according to the RT report below.
We also recommend this piece by Matt Kennard and Mark Curtis titled Revealed: Chief Magistrate In Assange Extradition Received Financial Benefits From Secretive Groups. The Chief Magistrate in the Assange case this week is Lady Emma Arbuthnot, who, as the article explores, is thoroughly tied into the British military and intelligence establishment, and who has refused to recuse herself in the Assange case for possible conflicts of interest. She, in turn, performs a supervisory function for other lower-ranking judges, in this case, Vanessa Baraitser, who ruled on Assange in September 2019 for his allegedly having skipped bail, keeping him in jail for his extradition hearing this month when, in fact, he should have been released back then (see British judge jails Assange indefinitely, despite end of prison sentence):
The chief magistrate’s role includes “supporting and guiding district judge colleagues”, including Vanessa Baraitser, who ruled on the case in 2019. Lady Arbuthnot is also likely to have approved of Baraitser’s appointment to hear the Assange case.
To what lengths will the British judiciary go to please the Deep State Anglo establishment this time around?
Assange’s US extradition hearing begins: What’s it all about and how did we get here?
Assange has languished in London’s top security Belmarsh Prison since he was dragged from London’s Ecuadorian Embassy by British police in April last year and subsequently slapped with 18 charges under the US Espionage Act, which could see him sentenced to up to 175 years in prison.
The Australian journalist and whistleblower had, for the seven years prior, been living in the London embassy, where he had sought asylum after skipping bail in relation to a Swedish sexual assault investigation, which he and his lawyers maintain was politically motivated (and which was later dropped).
Now, Assange’s fate is hanging in the balance in the Woolwich Crown Court with Judge Vanessa Baraitser hearing arguments for and against his extradition. The hearing is expected to last until Friday.
Assange’s lawyers have long argued that he would not receive a fair trial in the US and that the case against him is purely political, amounts to criminalizing the legitimate activities of journalists, and poses a threat to free speech.
WikiLeaks was founded in 2006 but came to prominence in 2010 when it published a classified video showing a US military helicopter killing around 12 people, including two Reuters journalists.
The video was part of a massive cache of military material leaked to the whistleblower site by former army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, who served seven years in prison before her 35-year sentence was commuted by former President Barack Obama in 2017.
Manning was jailed again in 2019 (and remains behind bars) for refusing to testify against WikiLeaks, saying she would rather “starve to death.”
Assange’s critics say that his activities do not amount to journalism and pose a threat to the national security of the US. During the 2016 US presidential election, WikiLeaks angered the US establishment, releasing leaks from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) which showed party leaders trying to restrain Bernie Sanders. Some Democrats claimed the publication was harmful to Hillary Clinton’s bid for the presidency and accused Assange of working with Russia to undermine her campaign.
Doctors who have visited Assange at Belmarsh have given stark public warnings about the deterioration of his health. This month, in their fourth letter to date, a group of more than 100 doctors warned the UK government that he could die in prison, having “effectively been tortured to death.” A similar assessment had previously been reached by Nils Melzer, the UN special rapporteur on torture, who concluded after visiting him that Assange was exhibiting “all the symptoms typical of prolonged exposure to psychological torture.”
A request in October by Assange’s legal team to have his extradition hearing postponed to allow more time to prepare the case was denied. His team has also consistently complained about a lack of access to the prison and said Assange was denied tools he needed to prepare his case, including a laptop and access to certain documents.
News reports last week claimed that US President Donald Trump had offered Assange a pardon if he would publicly say that Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks — but it turned out that Assange had already reportedly offered a US official “definitive proof” during a 2018 meeting that Russia was not behind the leaks.
The London court will not decide whether Assange is guilty of any crime, but will examine whether the US request for his extradition meets the requirements of a 2003 treaty. His team maintains that because the case is politically-motivated, the treaty should prevent his extradition.
After this week, the hearings will be postponed again until May 18.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.