Tunisia Dismisses the IMF for BRICS

ER Editor: The article below is machine-translated from Italian. First, some tweets:


See this Middle East Eye article from 2021, when the Tunisian president was under pandemic pressure to turn to the IMF for loans —

Tunisia resumes talks with IMF on rescue package

Remember when Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko blew the whistle on the IMF giving tranches of money to countries willing to lock down their citizens during the plandemic?

World Bank/IMF Exposed: COVID Aid Conditional On Imposing Extreme Lockdowns, Curfews


Tunisia has sent the International Monetary Fund (IMF) “bailout” to hell and plans to join the BRICS.

The North African state is going through a serious economic crisis and would have received 1.9 billion dollars from the IMF in exchange for the usual neoliberal reforms that further impoverish those who are already poor.

But President Kais Saied on April 6, 2023 expressed the refusal in decidedly clear words: Tunisia is not for sale, no to foreign interference, etc. Reuters writes that, according to the rating agencies, without IMF money, Tunisia risks default, ie. insolvency. Reuters does not explain how Tunisia now plans to get away with it: as if there were no alternative to the IMF and its rules.


But you can try to guess it. The main clue is that Tunisia intends to join the BRICS, the intergovernmental organization formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa: in recent months there has been a line-up to enter. The BRICS are impervious to the sanctions that the West has instituted against Russia. They are in fact the multipolar alternative to the G7 (United States, Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, Canada; plus the European Union) and the dollar , i.e. to a globalization dominated by the United States.

As a result, Tunisia is likely thinking of solving its problems by relying on the so-called Brics bank – in reality the New Development Bank – of which Dilma Rousseff has just become president. She was twice president of Brazil and in this capacity, says the note in which the bank announces her appointment, she fought against poverty and in favor of multilateralism.

In essence, Tunisia’s no to the IMF is a no to the West. Who ever, just a couple of years ago, would have imagined that such a small and poor country could have pronounced it? The point, however, is that the West seems to be heading towards an economic sunset, while the BRICS are growing overall. Purchasing power parity, in 1982 the G7 accounted for 50.42% of world GDP; in 2022, 30.39%Symmetrically, in 1982 the BRICS represented 10.66% of world GDP; in 2022, 31.59%.


Tunisia had reached an agreement in principle with the International Monetary Fund in autumn 2022, which President Kais Saied has now rejected. It involved a loan of $1.9 billion. And in return? Tax increases, wage cuts, elimination of public subsidies, structural reforms to encourage economic competition and attract foreign investors. The usual kiss of death, in short.

Now it may be that the International Monetary Fund lowers its requests a little: perhaps not to save Tunisia, but at least to save those who lent it money. In fact, it has made it known that the matter of the loan is not closed.

Even a “discount” on the claims of the IMF would be a defeat and a sign of weakness of the IMF itself. At the moment, however, there are no signs of appreciation from Tunisia in this regard.




The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.