Tomorrow is the Big Day For Switzerland and the World – The Covid Pass Is Subject to Direct Democracy

ER Editor: Tomorrow the citizens of Switzerland face a very big referendum on the fate of the Covid health pass. With their particular system of direct democracy, they get to deliver their own verdict on this law. And send a very important message to the rest of the world.

Prof. Christian Perronne is a huge name in medicine and vaccinology in France and beyond. See this interview he did with UKColumn back in July, which also gives his distinguished background. He’s been thoroughly persecuted for his honest, science-based views about the plandemic in France, and came out a while back saying it’s the vaccinated that need quarantining. Remarkably, he was recently allowed back on mainstream TV at the behest of journalist Ivan Rioufol. Below in a letter to the Swiss people, he addresses the importance of the referendum taking place tomorrow.

We remind readers of the appeal Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made to the people of Switzerland on a visit there earlier in November:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Directly Addresses Swiss Citizens – Global Democracy Is At [VIDEO]

********

MESSAGE TO MY SWISS FRIENDS

Dear Citizens of Switzerland,

This Sunday you will vote on the tightening of your Covid Law, and in particular on the taxation of the health pass.

As your democracy allows, many of you wanted a referendum to challenge these measures. The whole world is now watching you.

I am a doctor, teacher and researcher, specialising in infectious diseases. For fifteen years I chaired the commission in charge of the health response to epidemics and vaccine policy in France, and I was also vice-chairman of the WHO’s expert group on vaccines for Europe.

There are a number of things you should know before you vote.

It is good to speak out, but if the media do not give the right information, it is difficult to do so in an informed way.

First of all, the “health pass”, which you call the “Covid certificate”, is not about health. It is a political measure of coercion. The “vaccinated” can become infected, fall ill with Covid, and even develop serious forms of the disease. This is proof that it is not a question of vaccines. Multiplying the number of inoculations will not change anything.

Moreover, the “vaccinated” can contaminate the unvaccinated.

The contagiousness of the “vaccinated” and the “non-vaccinated” being the same, the health pass establishes a serious discrimination, without any usefulness on the health of the citizens.

This measure of constraint aims to force the population to accept what is presented as a vaccine by a form of blackmail, which is illegal in addition to being shameful.

The products they want to inject you with, wrongly called “vaccines”, are experimental gene substances that modify the functioning of your cells. In defiance of the precautionary principle, since the risks are significant in the short term and unknown in the medium and long term. Forcing the population to undergo phase 3 medical experimentation is strictly forbidden by the Nuremberg Code and the Oviedo Convention, ratified by our countries.

Furthermore, a conditional authorisation to market a vaccine cannot be granted if there are effective treatments – an effectiveness that has been attested by hundreds of studies. Countries such as Japan or territories such as Uttar Pradesh in India have extinguished the epidemic with cheap and effective drugs, which are banned in our country to ensure the imposition of pseudo-vaccination.

It can be observed that poor countries with little or no “vaccination” no longer have a Covid problem, whereas countries or regions that have practised massive “vaccinations” (such as the United Kingdom, Singapore, Iceland, the American state of Vermont, Israel, etc.) are experiencing outbreaks of infection and death.

In the intensive care units of some countries, the “vaccinated” are in the majority. A glance at the world maps shows that mass “vaccination” triggers, re-triggers or maintains the epidemic.

In Switzerland, as in France, the epidemic is currently at the level of any ordinary respiratory infection, and mortality is extremely low.

In France, there are only a few dozen deaths per day (46 in mid-November compared to 317 at the beginning of January). And as in all past epidemics, the viruses are developing less and less virulent variants.

The policy that has been pursued for almost two years in our countries is absurd and ineffective. If we had simply allowed the new virus to circulate, protected the groups at risk, isolated and treated the sick, we would have seen minimal damage. It is the wrong policy measures that have been and are being the most destructive.

For all these reasons, I invite you to vote NO to the toughening of your Covid Law on November 28th, and give the signal for a return to reason and true science among the nations.

Professor Christian Perronne

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.