ER Editor: A couple of RT pieces are linked to below, but see also this titled Defense, Foreign and Finance ministers retain their positions in new Russian government.
The new Russian government: a much needed evolution but not a revolution
The suspense is over and we now know the names of all the members of the new Russian government. You can, for example, take this good summary published by RT (titled New Russian government: Lavrov & Shoigu remain, but PM Mishustin appoints many fresh faces.)
What is important right now is not only what did happen, but also what did NOT happen. I will begin with two extremely important things which did NOT happen:
First, the Russian government has NOT remained unchanged. The naysayers had predicted that nothing at all would change, that the same folks would be sitting in maybe different seats, but that the changes would be primarily cosmetic. That did not happen. In reality, 12 people kept their seats and another 9 were replaced.
Second, this was NOT a total gutting of the Atlantic Integrationist block. Most visibly, Anton Siluanov remained as head of the Finance Ministry. However, Siluanov was demoted from his position as First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia, which has now been taken by Andrei Belousov, a huge change indeed. As for Medvedev, he was given a “golden promotion” to the largely technical position as Vice Chairman of the Security Council of Russia.
So what has taken place?
Most Russian observers notice two key things:
First, this is a highly competent, technically skilled government. Truly, and arguably for the first time, each position in the new cabinet is now occupied by a professional whose expertise is recognized by all.
Second, this is very much a non-ideological government. This is not to say that the social and economic policies of Russia will not change; they will and the new government clearly indicates that, especially with the nominations of Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin (pictured left) and his First Deputy Prime Minister Andrey Belousov. These are both on record as very much proponents of what is called “state capitalism” in Russia: meaning an economic philosophy in which the states does not stifle private entrepreneurship, but one in which the state is directly and heavily involved in creating the correct economic conditions for the government and private sector to grow. Most crucially, “state capitalism” also subordinates the sole goal of the corporate world (making profits) to the interests of the state and, therefore, to the interests of the people.
In other words, goodbye turbocapitalism à la Atlantic Integrationists!
Russia has now made the fight against poverty a national strategic priority, something which the Russian people had wanted for years and which the previous “economic block” never considered a priority.
Furthermore, the entire Eurasian Sovereignists block of the government has remained unchanged. This indicates two things:
First, the Russian national security and foreign policy will remain unchanged.
Second, the Eurasian Sovereignists have finally weakened the Atlantic Integrationists to such a degree that a Medvedev nicely “boxed in” in the Russian Security Council or a Siluanov “boxed in” in the new Russian government have ceased to represent a serious threat to the future of Russia.
In other words – we can expect the new government to put even much more effort into the ultimate goal of the full sovereignization of Russia (this goal is also reflected in the new Constitutional changes, which will now place Russian national laws above any international treaty or agreements, another longtime goal of the Eurasian Sovereignists).
All I can say here is “finally!!”
Another important thing which we can note is that Putin decided to work through evolution, not revolution. In fact, he has described this new government as a “balanced” one. There are many, including myself, who would have preferred not to see the names Medvedev and Siluanov again, but there are also many (possibly many more) who, seeing these names still present, might be reassured that Russia is not about to embark on a radically different political course. Frankly, I think that over the past century Russia has had enough revolutions, wars, big upheavals and terrible tragedies. There IS something to be said for stability and a gradual correction of course.
Furthermore, a new government which appears to have been formed purely on the merit of its individual members can probably generate much more support than a radically ideological one.
Where does all this leave Russia?
I would say that the Eurasian Sovereignists have finally secured their full control over the Russian state and that the demise of the Atlantic Integrationists is now a new fact of life. Since, in this new government, the only clearly identifiable group besides the Eurasian Sovereignists are the technocrats. This gives Russia a much better chance of standing strong and united in the face of an AngloZionist Empire, which has now clearly become unpredictable and therefore very dangerous (the murder of Soleimani is the best example of the actions of an Empire which has totally lost any sense of reality).
It is also interesting to note the reaction of the propaganda outlets for the Empire. Here are two of my favorite ones:
While the western “Russia experts” are usually folks who know close to nothing about Russia, and the little they do, they don’t understand, it is reassuring (and, let’s be honest here, heart warming) to see the impotent rage felt by the defenders of the AngloZionist Empire, who clearly have lost control of Russia (in spite of being in TOTAL control of the Russia of the 1990s!).
Finally, the appointment of this new government leaves the Russian opposition – both the “official” parliamentary opposition and the so-called “non-system” opposition – in total disarray: the former only pretends to oppose the policies of the Kremlin while the latter is so terminally discredited that it can’t even make it into the Duma. This lack of any credible opposition might appear desirable, especially for those who, like myself, support the Kremlin, but in reality it is just another facet of a much deeper problem: Russia remains a country defined by one person, Putin, and not by a healthy and stable system. The latest reforms did take a few very good steps in the right direction (the Duma’s powers and responsibilities have been increased), but Russia will remain “Putin’s country” for the foreseeable future.
[this column was written for the Unz Review]
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.