ER Editor: We also recommend this Zerohedge piece from yesterday titled “No Compromise”: Maidan Protesters Threaten ‘Overthrow’ As Zelensky Meets With Putin In Paris. Of note:
Headlines are suggesting it’s a “now or never” opportunity to bring the five-year long war in eastern Ukraine to an end, and to initiate a lasting peace. … It marked the first face to face meeting ever between Putin and Ukraine’s leader, who assumed office in May of this year, after an unlikely landslide victory based largely on promising to end the war in Donbass and improve relations with Russia. …
Though the conflict has been in and out of the headlines, a shocking 13,000 people have died since 2014, including civilians and militants on both sides, according to UN estimates. A further nearly four million people have been displaced by fighting, and a fragile ceasefire is currently in effect in the region.
Zelensky, however, is under considerable pressure from what The Saker would call the hardline ‘Ukronazis,’ (pictured below) who simply hate Russia and want no whiff of compromise with Putin. The Minsk agreements, creating a special, pro-Russian region of the Donbass with some internal autonomy, do not suit them:
Zelensky has lately come under fire especially from Ukrainian nationalists over his controversially agreeing to major concessions based on a road map to peace, including holding elections in the Russian-speaking war-torn region;…at home Zelensky is facing threats that civil unrest could break out if he says anything seen as giving Putin too much.
The iconic Maidan square has since filled with thousands of demonstrators Sunday into Monday, with one prominent speaker addressing the crowd with a warning for Zelensky himself: “Your flight will be not from Paris to Kiev, but from Paris to Rostov[-on-Don]. If it won’t be tomorrow then it’ll be a bit later,” prominent news host Vitaly Gaidukevich warned, referencing the southern Russian port city as a potential place of exile.
Hardline nationalists have promised to effectively overthrow the young Ukrainian leader should he cross ‘red lines’ in Paris.
Putin & Zelensky meet: Lasting peace in Ukraine closer, but still far away
The Normandy Four peace talks in Paris suggest that while the road is long, there may be light at the end of the tunnel when it comes to ending the Ukrainian war.
PARIS – At first, the omens were bad. A chaotic Monday in the French capital, as a transport strike left the bus and metro networks banjaxed. Immense traffic tailbacks added to the anger. However, by the afternoon, the sun broke through the clouds. Perhaps a sign of things to come as the ‘Normandy Four’ format resumed for the first time in a few years.
While Parisians shook their fists at the transit gods, Vladimir Putin and his counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky were preparing for their first meeting – the presidents of Russia and Ukraine finally under the same roof. If anyone had predicted, just a decade ago, how difficult it would be to organize such an encounter, you’d have classed them as insane. But almost six years since ‘Maidan’, Crimea and ethnic conflict in the Donbass, this is where things stand.
Under Petro Poroshenko’s (pictured) administration, peace in Eastern Ukraine wasn’t possible. Once the former Ukrainian president ratcheted up his decisive ethno-nationalist babble, it made compromise a non-runner. Instead, time was wasted on ridiculous posturing about language and religion. Poroshenko was rejected by Ukrainian voters in April, scoring 24 percent versus Zelensky’s 73.
The loser campaigned on a “patriotic” – and militant – platform while his successor promised to bring peace to his country’s east. The size of his mandate indicates what Ukraine’s voters valued more. Half a year on, 75 percent of Ukrainians support Zelensky’s outreach to Putin. A staggering figure, given five years of wall-to-wall anti-Russia rhetoric from the rejected Poroshenko.
Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, Zelensky, and Putin are trying to break the impasse. And all signs indicate momentum is finally behind some sort of settlement.
The main stumbling block appears to be the order in which Ukraine regains control of its eastern border and elections are held in the separatist regions. And while it seems like an issue which should be easy to solve with enough will, the reality is a little different.
Things are somewhat easier for Moscow here, given the Donetsk and Lugansk ‘People’s Republics’ are reliant on its support. However, for Zelensky it’s more complicated. The opposition he defeated is backboned by hardcore “patriots” (pictured) who don’t care much for the ballot box. They overthrew Viktor Yanukovich from the streets, and they could attempt another Maidan to oust Zelensky. The fact the West has already encouraged, let alone accepted, the forced removal of a democratically elected president in 2014 also complicates matters. Because a clear precedent has been set.
That said, the Western consensus which supported the last Maidan probably doesn’t exist now. Macron has made “normalizing” relations with Russia a priority, so he’d hardly support any uprising which would undermine Zelensky. And Merkel is on her last lap before retirement.
At the same time, US President Donald Trump is not remotely as fervent a supporter of NATO expansion as his predecessor, Barack Obama. And the key supporters of Ukrainian nationalism in Washington, Joe Biden and John McCain, no longer have direct influence: one is out of power and the other has died.
Nevertheless, Zelensky’s failure to secure a White House meeting with Trump also weakens his hand domestically. A strong US show of support, before heading to Paris, would have been a boon. To make matters worse, from Kiev’s point of view, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov went directly from Monday evening’s summit to Washington, where he will meet US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Tuesday and possibly also Trump himself. Frustratingly for Zelensky, it means the Americans will get the Russian version of events first-hand.
More to do
In order for some movement to begin, both sides have to disengage from the military frontlines. It appears Russia has proposed a complete withdrawal, but Kiev won’t agree. And the probable reason is that Ukrainian forces have slowly taken more territory in the supposed neutral (or “grey”) zone and now don’t want to pull back from their gains. It’s worth noting this area should be demilitarized under the Minsk agreements.
However, some progress was made, which increases hope that everyone is finally pulling in the right direction. There was a fresh commitment to ceasefire enforcement and three new front-line disengagement areas agreed, plus a promise to work towards a further prisoner exchange and open extra civilian crossing points. All this is positive, as is the pledge to meet again within four months.
Afterward, Putin stressed that he wants the opposing sides in Donbass to communicate directly – something Kiev has been unprepared to do, up to now. This policy, of course, denies local pro-Russian separatists any agency and will have to change before any final settlement is reached, because they hold legitimate fears about how they will be treated if the region comes back under Ukrainian government control.
It’s also notable that Crimea wasn’t mentioned in the post-summit communique, which was apparently put together before the leaders even sat down – although Zelensky did briefly reference the peninsula during the subsequent press briefing. Make of that what you will.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.