ER Editor:Dr. Peter McCullough was out of the gate early on, being a valiant critique of the Covid era. Astute observers, such as Dr. Jane Ruby, however, have noticed how much he has relentlessly pushed Big Pharma products all along (such as Paxlovid, for example), until he can’t – until he must change tune because the pharma product is shown to be dangerous or because the evidence for ivermectin, for example, becomes overwhelming. Steve Kirsch is another one of these, pushing and funding Remdesivir, until he couldn’t.
And we’ve noticed how McCullough and his Substack partner John Leake push the Wuhan narrative, as if the Russian DoD doesn’t have a stack of evidence at their disposal about ‘Covid’ being produced in Ukraine.
********
Open Letter to Arizona State Senator Janae Shamp on the Testimony of Peter McCullough
This article constitutes an open letter to Senator Shamp on the false narrative presented to her Committee by Peter McCullough, and the conflicting financial interests of McCullough which may have prevented him from telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” to the Arizona State Senators.
Senator Shamp opened the hearing with a moment of silence for a friend who was killed by Hospital Protocols.
Senator Shamp: “I think most people know me around here as the nurse who was fired for not getting the vaccination. But today I am also a friend of someone who recently died from the ongoing COVID-19 Hospital Protocols that I was told last year were not being utilized anymore.”
“I would like to do a moment of silence for my dear friend and all of the COVID-19 Hospital Protocol victims.”
“Hospitals across America continue to medically gaslight and ignore the evidence presented through various congressional and state-led hearings. This astonishingly flippant attitude has prioritized expensive drugs like Remdesivir while banning more effective and less costly treatments.”
Senator Shamp, I would like to make you aware of the financial conflicts of interest of Peter McCullough. I will also point out some issues that I have with Mr. McCullough’s testimony.
Between 2016-2022, Mr. McCullough received payments from numerous pharmaceutical companies including Sanofi Us Services Inc., Astrazeneca UK Limited, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Amarin Pharma Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Llc, GE Healthcare, Amgen Inc., Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and others. (5)
The payments to Mr. McCullough from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals in particular represent a conflict of interest for Mr. McCullough in properly reporting the nature of deaths in hospitals.
In fiscal year 2022, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was the highest bidder for Mr. McCullough’s services, described as either speaking or consulting services. (4). Also in 2022, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. made a large payment to Beth Israel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center was the second largest recepient of payments from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, behind the Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna. (5)
A large amount of their ventilated patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS at Beth Israel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center by March 2020. (7,8,9). Beth Israel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center was killing their patients and collecting payments from the government via this method. Dr. McCullough has common funding source with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and perhaps has a financial incentive to describe these deaths as “failures” instead of “homicides.”
Mr. McCullough and others closely associated with him have advanced a notion that “early treatment saves lives.” This is an extremely poor and incorrect interpretation of data. These statistics they quote compare mortality rates of people receiving “early treatments” such as Ivermectin to the death rates resulting from Hospital Protocols. These studies do NOT compare death rates of Ivermectin to death rates of “COVID.” You cannot call a death that results from giving a known deadly drug Remdesivir, loading them up with opioids, and ventilating them, causing bacterial pneumonia, renal failure, along with denying these patients food, water, and basic hygiene a “COVID” death caused by a virus.
You cannot use these homicide rates to claim that “early treatments save lives” by comparison.
Every study that compares things that do not kill patients to Hospital Protocols that do kill patients, and interprets this data to read “these treatments could have saved lives” is based on an incorrect interpretation of data. I hope that you can accept this extremely simple statistical concept.
The next time someone says something saved lives by comparison, ask how those other people really died.
Early treatments such as Ivermectin do not kill patients, Hospitals and vaccines do. It’s that simple. COVID is not killing anyone, anywhere. Senator Shamp, I recommend that you call other expert witnesses to testify before your committee who will tell you the truth.
Dr. Michael Yeadon is now on record that there was never a viral “COVID” Pandemic. (6). Sasha Latypova has said that it is not possible to engineer viruses that spread person-to-person the manner in which the alleged virus was said to have spread. Drs. Mark and Sam Bailey have debunked the fraudulent and unscientific methods to create the in silico SARS-CoV-2 virus sequence, which the meaningless PCR tests tested for. (10). The SARS-CoV-2 is a fabrication, any way you want to look at it.
There are numerous medical uses of Ivermectin. The methods by which Ivermectin worked to save falsely-labeled “COVID” patients lives needs to be studied, although it seems clear that the antibiotic effects of Ivermectin were the main reason for the sharp reduction in mortality among hospitalized “COVID” patients.
Mary Talley Bowden reported that a high rate of hospitalized “COVID” patients survived after receiving Ivermectin under Court Order.All who were denied Ivermectin by a Court died. (2). These case studies should show how Ivermectin saved their lives.
ARDS, created by Beth Israel Medical Center and other ICUs across the country, is a blood clotting condition based on circulating endotoxin or bacteria (1). Ivermectin is likely beneficial in treating ventilator-induced ARDS. Recent studies have shown the extremely high rate of bacterial pneumonia in ventilated “COVID” patients. (3). Ivermectin would have worked to treat bacterial pneumonia.
Ivermectin works, but it works to reverse the damage caused by Hospitals, not “COVID.”
Mr. McCullough started his presentation with a false and fear-based narrative of an engineered virus that spread around the world.
8:00 McCoullough:
COVID-19 illness and the vaccine are very similar in that they expose patients to a protein on the surface of the virus, the spiculule if you will, the spine on the surface of the virus called the spike protein. This spike protein was intentionally engineered in a Chinese biosecurity lab in Wuhan China. The spike protein is not a natural protein. It’s been modified by mankind in a joint US-Chinese collaboration that took years to create SARS-CoV-2. It’s now fully acknowledged through the House Select Coronavirus Investigative Committee in Washington, that SARS-CoV-2 was created in the Chinese biosecurity lab in Wuhan China. (ER: We note that he’s pushing the Chinese narrative on this, not the Ukrainian/US biolab one. The Russians are supposed to have chapter and verse on this.)
Mr. McCullough continued to call the use of Remdesivir a “failure” in response to the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus. This goes along with McCullough’s larger notion that other “early treatments” would have worked better at fighting the mythical virus. The reality is that Remdesivir was part of a deadly Protocol that intentionally killed patients.
47:50 McCullough:
Well there are certainly manuscripts published from around the world regarding in-hospital outcomes and the use of Remdesivir. The one way to think about hospitalization is that someone dying of COVID-19 in the hospital is a failure. It’s a failure that the hospital was supposed to save lives. There shouldn’t have been a single death in the hospital. That should have been the demand from Americans. The observation that there were almost no deaths of people at home with COVID is startling. You’d think that if this was indeed truly an illness with a natural history and a fatal outcome there would be people dead at home. You would just think that’s the case. One cannot find manuscripts or reports of that in the United States because virtually all the deaths occurred in the hospitals. So the question on the table is, what occurred at the hospital that failed to save lives?
It is clearly illogical to state that hospitals “failed to save lives” when you also know damned good and well that “there were almost no deaths of people at home,” as he also said. This is called mass homicide for renumeration, Senator Shamp, not “a failure.”
Hospitals were following Protocols subsidized by the government. For each positive (and meaningless) COVID-19 PCR test, for each dose of Remdesivir, each person ventilated, and for each person they killed in their hospitals with “COVID” on the death certificate, Hospitals received compensation from the Federal Government.
Peter McCullough is receiving payments from pharmaceutical companies that also pay these Hospitals, Senator Shamp, and I respectfully submit this information for your consideration.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
How safe is Winston Smith (Barry young) in the hands of Steve Kirsch?