ER Editor: We also recommend this short piece by AFP via The Telegraph – French general rebuked after telling Notre Dame architect to ‘shut his mouth’ after renovations. The RT piece below raises the key issue – why aren’t the citizens getting what they were promised instead of some (likely) post-modern piece of incoherent architectural nonsense?
Notre Dame row: French stirred as Macron’s general tells architect to ‘shut his mouth’ over staying true to original spire design
It’s not a fight you expect to see very often, but the reconstruction of the fire-gutted Notre Dame cathedral has led to a showdown between the chief architect and General Jean-Louis Georgelin, appointed by French President Emmanuel Macron to pilot the restoration project.
Chief architect Philippe Villeneuve (pictured) has been faced with an ambitious five-year deadline to restore the famed cathedral’s interior, roof, and the iconic spire completely destroyed in the April blaze.
But now it appears Georgelin and Macron have run into trouble with Villeneuve’s vision of the spire’s look – which for him is staying as true as possible to the original design. Georgelin and Macron both want to redesign the spire to give it a more “contemporary” look, and their side has an argument that the 19th-century addition is in itself a redesign of the lost 13th-century feature. Villeneuve, meanwhile, has made it clear that if he is to be the architect on the project, then it must be identical to what stood before. This is also the only way to meet the five-year deadline, he adds.
A public argument about the restoration broke out late Wednesday at the French National Assembly, and Georgelin did not mince words there. Asked about Villeneuve point of view, the general said: “As for the chief architect, I have already explained that he should shut his mouth.” He added that all involved with the project need to “move ahead in wisdom so that we can serenely make the best choice for Notre Dame, for Paris, for the world.”
A final decision on the spire will not be reached until 2021. But the architect is not likely to budge. Last month he told RTL that “either I restore it identically… or they make a contemporary spire and it will be someone else [doing it].”
Georgelin is already facing backlash for his remarks. Minister of Culture Franck Riester said on Thursday in a tweet that his comments are “not acceptable,” adding “Respect is a cardinal value of our society, and as public officials we must be exemplary.”
A number of outraged netizens also took offense to the harsh statement, some even calling for the general’s resignation, or outright removal from office.
“[Only two] things to do: make sure that General Georgelin is removed from office, give the floor to Mr. Philippe Villeneuve and follow his recommendations,” one user tweeted, while another said parliament should “demand his immediate resignation.”
What is strange about the whole debate is that it is happening at all. When a “contemporary” redesign was first mentioned, there was a major public outcry. The French Senate even voted that the cathedral must be restored to its original glory.
While the reconstruction project would seem to be a straightforward endeavor, it has been anything but. Many see the building and its restoration as a point of national pride. The cathedral has stood tall since the 12th century and is central to the history of France, and regarded as an architectural gem of the Western world. It is also France’s number one tourist site. While there have been restoration projects in the past, this attempt to make the cathedral “contemporary” smells of an opportunistic vanity project. This is true for many especially in the wake of the tragic fire, which reminded people around the world just how important the cathedral really is.
Considering public outcries in the past, it should come as no surprise that many are taking to social media to slam Macron and his general for seemingly going against what the people were promised by the Senate when this entire multi-million euro project was approved in the first place.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.