Navalny’s death and that list of Putin’s opponents all on the payroll of MI6 and Soros

The portrait of Alexei Navalny is actually far from the once again fictitious one constructed by certain press.

Navalny was a lawyer who had already ended up entangled in various corruption and malfeasance events which had led him to a criminal conviction for a fraud carried out against the French cosmetics company Yves Rocher.

The fixer had embezzled more than half a million dollars from this company and was convicted of embezzlement on December 30, 2014.

The evidence presented during the trial against him was overwhelming to say the least, but the Western media began to build a character by making it appear that the Russian lawyer was a “political prisoner”.

The “verdicts” condemning the sentence judged as “political” by the European Court of Human Rights, whose officials are notoriously financed by the American financier of Jewish origins, George Soros, arrived promptly, so much so that this court could more properly be called the Soros Court, given the close financial dependence it boasts with the founder of the Open Society.

The ECHR was followed by the condemnations of Amnesty International, another organization that received funds from Soros who over the decades has built a real network of international subversion through this extensive network of NGOs that brandish the cult of human rights against those who are not aligned with globalist directives.

Navalny’s predecessors also linked to the West

However, Navalny is not the first opponent who is built in the laboratory of Western intelligence and who dies in circumstances that benefit everyone except Putin himself.

Readers will certainly remember the Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, a columnist for the Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta who was shot and killed in 2006 in the elevator of her apartment in the center of Moscow.

Politkovskaya had apparently received death threats in the past and had suffered an alleged poisoning attempt two years earlier while on a flight to Ossetia after drinking tea served to her by a flight attendant from the Russian airline Aeroflot.

Keep in mind the poisoning trail as it will be a constant in all cases involving Putin’s opponents, and it is the key to understanding who is probably behind all these murders or attempted murders carried out through poisons.

Anna Politkosvaya, however, was far from being the independent and indomitable journalist that the local media claimed her to be.

The newspaper for which she wrote, Novaya Gazeta, was founded by Mikhail Gorbachev, who today it is not far-fetched to define as the hitman of the Soviet Union, for which we certainly have no regrets, but it is clear that this organization was taken to the grave by the same architects who conceived it many years ago.

When Gorbachev appeared on the political scene in the 1980s, the Western media extolled his figure as an “innovator” and began to describe him as the man who could finally bring the USSR closer to the liberal West.

The clubs of the most exclusive power such as the Bilderberg Group, frequented by Henry Kissinger and members of the Rockefeller family, supported him ardently because they know that the new secretary of the CPSU was working hard to end the Cold War and allow NATO imperialism to no longer have rivals.

Gorbachev did not disappoint expectations. His initiatives against “corruption” and his action of erosion from within the USSR arrived at the inevitable epilogue of the fall of the Berlin Wall and with the liquidation of the Soviet Union replaced by federal Russia, which in those years was in the hands of the Ashkenazi oligarchs and the CIA, before the “hated” Putin arrived.

Novaya Gazeta is very far from being an “independent” newspaper. It is a newspaper very close to the Western world, so much so that it had received huge funding from Soros’ foundation, as the editors of the Russian newspaper themselves confirmed.

Anna Politskovaya was paid through these funds and this did not make her a free journalist, but a simple spokesperson for Soros and those globalist circles who wanted to overthrow Putin.

Her death on October 7, 2006, Putin’s birthday, seems to be the result of some deviant mind that in the offices of MI6 – the infamous British secret service that is always present behind these hired opponents – gave birth to this botched script to make it all seem like a birthday present to the Russian president.

Only a madman or someone completely in bad faith could think that Putin would be so idiotic as to get rid of a journalist notoriously linked to the Western world in such a blatant way, bringing upon himself the highly predictable lynching of the international mainstream media.

Poisonings of Putin’s opponents point to London

Just as the death of another person, Alexander Litvinenko, a former secret agent of the Russian secret services who defected in the early 2000s, makes no sense from the perspective of Russia’s interests.

Litvinenko had joined the British intelligence service at this time and received a fixed salary from MI6 which paid him £2,000 a month .

Before being paid by His Majesty’s services, Litvinenko had received payments from Boris Berezovsky, one of the oligarchs of Jewish origin who took advantage of the power vacuum created by the divestment of the USSR in the 1990s to buy Russian state shares at a clear price sold off by Boris Yeltsin with the assistance of an American economics professor, also Ashkenazi, Jeffrey Sachs.

Berezovsky, who passed away in 2013 in circumstances still unclear, hated Putin because once the Russian president came to power he began to put a brake on the enormous power that the oligarchs had accumulated, and this led the Russian billionaire to seek refuge in Great Britain, again ready to assist all subversives who want to overthrow the Russian president.

Litvinenko dies of poisoning after taking polonium 210, only a month after Anna Politskovaya in London when he had already long since passed into the service of the English.

If there is anyone who should therefore be called into question, it should be London since it was she who had now hired the deserter into her ranks.

Obviously the Western media is once again pointing the finger at Putin, despite the former KGB agent having been in service for the British for some time and despite London having a controversial history with the study and use of poisons.

It is a story that we told in a previous contribution and it is that of the illegal experiments that were conducted in the Porton Down laboratory , in the Saltshire region.

In this secret facility, very dangerous nerve gases have been tested since the Second World War, which also cost the life of aviator Ronald Maddison, whose death was covered up by one of the “heroes” of the Western liberal establishment, namely the former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

London therefore had and has a very particular history regarding the use of poisons as biological weapons to be used in war and against political adversaries, but the international media were careful not to tell it on that occasion so as not to raise the suspicion to the public that it was probably she who carried out these murders.

The assassinations of Putin’s opponents, or perhaps we should say defecting Russian agents controlled by the Anglosphere, have evidently brought no benefit to the Russian president.

On the contrary, they served to mount a massive press campaign of denigration by the West against Russia, falsely accused of killing its opponents.

And the trail of poisonings involving people hostile to Putin close to Great Britain continued even after the Litvinenko case, with the death of Sergei Skripal, another deserter from the Russian armed forces who passed into the service of MI6 and died of poisoning in the town of Salisbury.

The “coincidence” has it that Salisbury is only 12 km away from the aforementioned Porton Down laboratory, and even in this circumstance, obviously, the media did not point out this enormous connection between Skripal’s death which occurred with the Novichok nerve gas, on which experiments were carried out in the British government’s biochemical laboratory.

Navalny appears to be no exception to this rule. In 2020, German authorities who had him in custody claimed that the Russian fixer had been poisoned through cholinesterase inhibitors .

Even if this version is true, if Putin had wanted to eliminate Navalny he could have done so years earlier without making much noise.

Moscow then knew perfectly well that the former lawyer was nothing more than a puppet managed by the English services and had also declared it publicly.

The irrefutable proof that Navalny was at the service of the British intelligence is in a video in which one of his collaborators, Vladimir Ashurkov, is portrayed together with the MI6 agent, James William Thomas Ford, from whom he asks for 10 to 20 million dollars a year to start a color revolution to overthrow Putin.

The video in which Ashurkov asks Ford for financing

It would therefore have been foolish and suicidal for the Kremlin to authorize his elimination once again, which would have done nothing but unleash yet another anti-Russian press campaign.

Above all, it should be noted that the Russian president does not follow the “techniques” of his detractors, who instead have no scruple whatsoever in resorting to murders and attacks which often even cost the lives of innocent people.

This long trail of poisoning deaths closely resembles a recurring “false flag” strategy executed by the British intelligence services.

In the world of intelligence, false flags mean those operations, attacks or political assassinations carried out by some services which are then passed off as the work of countries considered “enemies” by these spy agencies.

The history of Western and Israeli intelligence is full of this type of attacks and the most sensational and most recent case concerns that of the leader of ISIS, al-Baghdadi, a fictitious name that would hide the identity of a Mossad agent called Simon Elliot.

In this case, we would once again be faced with a new chapter in the deliberate strategy of defaming Russia carried out by the Anglosphere services assisted in turn by the megaphone of the Western media which dumps these corpses on Putin to make him appear responsible when in reality, the real culprits seem very far from Moscow and very close to London.

It is a very worn strategy that produces nothing concrete in the perception of the increasingly saturated public opinion of Euro-Atlanticism, but the Anglosphere is really short of ideas and continues to draw from the old repertoire.

It is another sign of weakness of the liberal West, which is unable to arrest its political decline in any way, and above all it is unable to accept all its irrelevance in a historical phase which is seeing the decline of an “order” which has existed from World War II onwards.

Source

Featured image source: https://www.agenzianova.com/en/news/Russia-the-children-of-the-journalist-Politkovskaya-against-the-pardon-of-the-former-police-officer-convicted-of-the-assassination/