ER Editor: We’ve followed the literal trials and tribulations of Compact Magazine and its editor Jurgen Elsasser here.
Elsasser keeps winning against Interior Minister Nancy Faeser’s attempts to quosh the magazine, but the win isn’t of the broader kind that permits German independent media to function freely without threat from the state. eugyppius below explains how the current ruling in favour of Elsasser doesn’t quite go far enough. If you favour remigration, for example, is it a defining characteristic of your media site or not? If so, you get banned. In Elsasser’s case, it’s not, but obviously the dividing line between publishing state-disapproved content and publishing too much of it is very thin indeed.
How do media sites get banned under German law? Because they’re classified as ‘associations‘ and there is a law governing them. Germany is a country we’re very glad we don’t live in, and that is saying something when you look at France.
Here is The Guardian’s conventional take on the matter below —
MARSHMALLOW MINISTER MASHED: Leipzig court overturns Nancy Faeser’s ban on the AfD-adjacent magazine Compact
It is a defeat for Faeser and a victory for Compact, but in the worst possible way.
eugyppius
Last year, our then-Interior Minister Nancy Faeser banned the AfD-adjacent magazine Compact.
It was one of the more shocking moves in her campaign to crack down on “the extreme right” by restricting the speech, travel and economic activity of political dissidents in the Federal Republic. Faeser’s ban included early morning police raids on the homes of Compact editorial staff, a seizure of all Compact assets right down to the office furniture, and a blanket prohibition on reproducing any of the logos or images associated with the magazine.
Jürgen Elsässer in court with his wife and lawyer (Photo credit: dpa)
.
I wrote all about it here:
German Interior Minister bans AfD-adjacent “right-wing extremist” magazine, raids homes of editorial staff, seizes assets, in the latest effort to defend democracy by abolishing democratic freedoms
Compact was a German magazine founded in 2010 by the former leftist Jürgen Elsässer. With a circulation of 40,000, it was a vocal supporter of the nationalist wing of Alternative für Deutschland…
In a truly deranged press release that is still available on the BMI website, Faeser’s office called the move “a heavy blow against the far-right scene” and ranted about “spiritual arsonists who are fuelling a climate of hatred and violence towards refugees” and who “want to overturn our democratic state.”
Legally, their case rested on all manner of things Compact said that Faeser and the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution didn’t like. At the core of their argument, however, was the familiar objection that Compact insisted on differentiating naturalised from ethnic Germans – a thesis that (according to current jurisprudence) becomes unconstitutional to the extent it suggests naturalised Germans do not enjoy the full rights of citizenship.
Compact’s founder and editor-in-chief, Jürgen Elsässer, immediately challenged Faeser’s actions before the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig. The judges there lifted the ban temporarily while the case was pending.
It is a richly deserved and cathartic slap in the face to our Marshmallow Minister – the most sinister but also the stupidest person ever to pollute the offices of the Interior Ministry. Part of me wishes Faeser were still in office just so we could all watch her face amid the mounting calls for her resignation, because a defeat of this scale should indeed be a career-ending failure. The rest of me of course knows that she would never resign and that she is too insane ever to experience such a thing as humiliation.
At this point you might be asking how it is that German Interior Ministers have amassed the authority to ban entire publications in the first place, and whether the Leipzig court has withdrawn that power from their arsenal. You might also be asking if the idiots at the state media programme tagesschau were correct when they wrote back in January that a Compact victory “would open the floodgates to far-right rhetoric in the media.”
The answer, alas, is no. The idiots at tagesschau are almost never right and no floodgates have been opened. The ruling is good for Compact specifically, but for the rest of us, it’s kind of disturbing.
Article 9 of our Basic Law and section 3 of the Vereinsgesetz, or the “Law on Associations,” allow the state to prohibit “associations whose purposes or activities … are directed against the constitutional order,” and the Vereinsgesetz in particular permits the Interior Ministry to decide on such bans and to confiscate the assets of prohibited organisations. This is more of that uniquely German defensive democracy I keep telling you about. Because most press outlets, including Compact, are also legal associations, Interior Ministers now and again become tempted to use the Vereinsgesetz to circumscribe our otherwise constitutionally guaranteed freedom of the press.
Before Faeser’s move against Compact, this tactic had only been used rarely – against small-time extremist websites and the like. Its legality was pretty much untested.
He explicitly confirmed that the Vereinsgesetz may also be used against media organisations, and he also found that some of the material published by Compact is “unconstitutional” – especially their remarks on Islam and “remigration.” The court press release focuses in particular on the close relationship between Compact and the Austrian Identitarian activist Martin Sellner, whose programme of “remigration” Compact has repeatedly endorsed, at length and “without any reservations.” The court is clear that such content could indeed warrant a ban; in this case it doesn’t, only because this material does “not yet” meet the threshold of being a “defining characteristic” of Compact as a publication.
I’m happy Elsässer survived this one, even if I find the man’s work often kind of naive and unbearable. But this ruling is not good, and shouldn’t be celebrated as a victory for freedom of speech.
Featured image source: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien-und-film/compact-verboten-so-sah-die-hetze-im-heft-aus-19860241.html
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
eugyppius
eugyppius
Leave a Reply