.
ER Editor: Below is a two-fer from RT and Covert Geopolitics.
Israeli settlements illegal – top UN court
West Jerusalem is carrying out a “de-facto annexation” of the West Bank, the International Court of Justice has ruled
RT
Israel’s construction of settlements on Palestinian land violates the Geneva Convention and amounts to a policy of “de-facto annexation,” the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has declared. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dismissed the “false ruling,” insisting that the West Bank is Jewish land.
The court’s 15 justices agreed on Friday that “the transfer by Israel of settlers to the West Bank and Jerusalem as well as Israel’s maintenance of their presence, is contrary to article 49 of the fourth Geneva Convention”.
Reading out the non-binding advisory opinion, ICJ President Nawaf Salam described Israel’s building of settlements in the West Bank as a “de-facto annexation” of the territory, and stated that the Jewish state should end its “unlawful” presence in occupied Palestinian territory as “rapidly as possible.”
The ICJ has been investigating Israel’s “policies and practices” toward the occupied Palestinian territories since early 2023, at the request of the UN General Assembly. At a series of hearings in February, the Palestinian Authority’s foreign minister, Riad Malki, accused Israel of apartheid and called on the court to declare the occupation of Palestinian land illegal. Israel did not send legal representatives to the hearings.
While Friday’s ruling will inform the UN’s stance on Israeli settlements, the ICJ lacks any means of enforcing the decision.
“The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land — not in our eternal capital Jerusalem, not in the land of our ancestors in Judea and Samaria,” Netanyahu said in a statement shortly after the verdict was read out. “No false decision in The Hague will distort this historical truth, just as the legality of Israeli settlement in all the territories of our homeland cannot be contested,” he added.
Netanyahu’s hardline coalition partners have called for an even harsher response. Speaking to reporters last week, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said that Netanyahu should formally annex the entire West Bank and East Jerusalem if the court were to rule against Israel. Smotrich also promised to step up the construction of settlements to “thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Israel seized the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem during the 1967 Six-Day War. The West Bank is split into three areas, with less than a fifth of its territory under full control of the Palestinian Authority. Just over a fifth is under Israeli security control and Palestinian administrative control, while the remainder – comprising around 60% of the territory – is under full Israeli control.
It is in this latter area – designated ‘Area C’ under the 2000 Oslo Accords – where Israel has built most of its settlements. Under the agreements, Israel was never meant to maintain permanent control over this area. However, the Israeli government has signed off on the construction of nearly 150 settlements there since the early 2000s, and more than 450,000 settlers now live in the West Bank, according to data from Israeli anti-settlement activists.
Source
ICJ Declares Israel’s Occupation Illegal: Global Reactions and Implications
COVERT GEOPOLITICS
In a landmark ruling, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories illegal, marking a significant moment in the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This advisory opinion, sought by the United Nations General Assembly, has sent ripples through the international community and reignited debates about the future of the occupied territories.
The ICJ’s Ruling: A Call for Change
On Friday, the world’s highest court concluded with a 12-3 majority that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories is unlawful. The ICJ found that Israel is forcibly displacing Palestinians, exploiting water sources, and annexing large swaths of occupied territory “by force.” The court also ruled that Israel must halt all settlement construction in the West Bank and should compensate Palestinians for human rights violations in the occupied territories.
The ruling specifically addressed Israel’s actions in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza. It called on the United Nations, particularly the Security Council and General Assembly, to take action to bring Israel’s unlawful occupation to a “rapid” end.
Israel’s Response and Domestic Reactions
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu swiftly dismissed the ICJ’s ruling, calling it “false” and insisting that the West Bank is Jewish land. Netanyahu stated, “The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land — not in our eternal capital Jerusalem, not in the land of our ancestors in Judea and Samaria.”
Some of Netanyahu’s hardline coalition partners have called for even stronger responses. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich suggested that Netanyahu should formally annex the entire West Bank and East Jerusalem if the court were to rule against Israel. Smotrich also promised to accelerate the construction of settlements to “thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state.”
Palestinian Perspectives and Cautious Optimism
While the ICJ ruling is seen as a victory for Palestinian rights, many activists and legal experts in the West Bank express caution about its immediate impact. Zainah el-Haroun, spokesperson for Al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights organization, pointed out that previous ICJ rulings have not led to significant global action against Israel.
Palestinian activists stress that the ruling must be understood in the context of the Nakba, or “Catastrophe,” of 1948 when Zionist militias expelled about 750,000 Palestinians from their lands to create the state of Israel. Diana Buttu, a Palestinian legal expert, expressed a desire for the ICJ to have referenced the Nakba to highlight the historic pattern of Israel’s behavior in the occupied territory.
The Ongoing Humanitarian Crisis
The ICJ ruling comes against the backdrop of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, which has resulted in a devastating humanitarian crisis. According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, at least 38,848 Palestinians have been killed since October 7, 2023, with the majority being civilians. The conflict has rendered Gaza largely uninhabitable, with outbreaks of diseases such as polio and cholera, and severe food shortages due to Israel’s siege of the enclave.
International Reactions and Potential Consequences
The international community’s response to the ICJ ruling has been mixed. While many countries and human rights organizations have welcomed the decision, others have expressed concerns about its enforceability.
Britain’s Foreign Minister, David Lammy, announced that the UK would resume its funding to the UN’s Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA), providing 21 million pounds ($27 million) in aid. This decision comes after reassurances that UNRWA had taken steps to “ensure it meets the highest standards of neutrality.”
The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities
The ICJ’s ruling, while non-binding, carries significant moral and legal weight. It presents both challenges and opportunities for the international community:
- Enforcement Mechanisms: The lack of direct enforcement mechanisms for ICJ rulings poses a challenge to implementing the court’s recommendations.
- Diplomatic Pressure: The ruling may increase diplomatic pressure on Israel and its allies to address the occupation and its consequences.
- UN Action: The ball is now in the court of the UN Security Council and General Assembly to take concrete steps towards ending the occupation.
- Settlement Expansion: The ruling explicitly calls for an end to settlement construction, putting increased scrutiny on Israel’s actions in the West Bank.
- Humanitarian Aid: The decision may lead to increased international focus on providing humanitarian assistance to Palestinians, particularly in Gaza.
Conclusion: A Turning Point or Status Quo?
The ICJ’s ruling represents a significant legal and moral victory for Palestinians, but its real-world impact remains to be seen.
As the international community grapples with the implications of this decision, the lives of millions of Palestinians hang in the balance. The coming months and years will reveal whether this ruling will serve as a turning point in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or if it will join previous declarations in failing to significantly alter the status quo.
The path forward requires concerted effort from all parties involved – Israel, Palestine, and the international community – to work towards a just and lasting peace that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians. Only time will tell if this ICJ ruling will be the catalyst for such a transformation.
SOURCE
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
A prior genocide by the same character type
“VertigoPolitix – The Genocide of Russia’s Old Believers”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVQAlCNQrCI
The Bolshevik leaders were predominantly Ashkenazi.
Do you see any similarities between this history and that of the Israeli butchers?
The West KNEW about the Russian butchery, kept quiet and helped build the Soviet Union. The West KNOWS about the Israeli butchery and is clearly trying to protect the perpetrators.