Australians Call for Pause on Gene-Based COVID-19 Vaccines

ER Editor: We wonder if this signals a turn-around in the quality and honesty of peer-reviewed journals, which have taken a well-deserved beating for their corruption over the last little while.

********

Australians Call for Pause on Gene-Based COVID-19 Vaccines

Peer-Reviewed Manuscript Says Theoretical Benefits Not Worth the Risk

There are probably thousands of peer-reviewed manuscripts that give mass indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination a wave-on by falsely asserting “vaccines have saved millions of lives” or “the benefits of vaccination continue the outweigh the risks.” These statements are cursory, not supported by data, and often are slapped into the text of papers describing horrific safety events such as heart damage, blood clots, neurological injury, and auto-immunity.

Rhodes and Parry published a paper in Pathology, Research, and Practice that fairly concludes:

“Neither risk nor cost can justify these products for the vast majority of people. Lack of efficacy against infection and transmission, and the equivalent benefits of natural immunity, obviate mandatory therapeutics. With the many gene-based pharmaceuticals planned, a new era of pathology lies ahead. We should pause, reflect, and reaffirm essential freedoms, welcome the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, embrace natural immunity, and lift all mandated medical therapy.”

 

Peter Rhodes, Peter Parry, Gene-based COVID-19 vaccines: Australian perspectives in a corporate and global context, Pathology – Research and Practice, Volume 253, 2024, 155030, ISSN 0344-0338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2023.155030.

This paper is important because issues in medicine always need balance and discussion. A paper drawing the opposite conclusion of so many others is worth review, discussion, and consideration in academic medical centers all over the world.

Probably years after the vaccine debacle, historians will search for such papers and public comment where physicians and scientists were making calls of concern for public safety in a time when the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex was running the table in academic medicine.

Source

************

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*