Are the Royals being taken out once and for all?

ER Editor: We know these people are either likely arrested, or gone with actors put in their place. Suddenly there is a flurry of strange, mortality-related news about a handful of royals.

Not least is Kate Middleton, which UK online media have lately been fretting about because, allegedly, she was in hospital for at least 14 days for ‘abdominal surgery’, went back home, but wasn’t seen leaving the facility. Here’s a UK media sample from yesterday (below), following upon a Spanish media outlet saying she’d gone into a coma.

Here’s the Spanish media outlet reporting on it (browsers will translate) —

Concha Calleja, from ‘Fiesta’, against the British Royal House by Kate Middleton: “Something has gone wrong”

Notice that Kate was allegedly hospitalized on the 17th of the month. A few sharp people have noticed that there never seem to be updated photos of Kate looking like the middle-aged woman she is (42). (At this point, we’re actually thinking ‘woman’. There, we said it.) Then we get the ‘aged 10 years in 2’ photo. Is it even her?


The latest Charles news is below (we haven’t seen the real one in some time, with his swollen, pudgy fingers and red complexion – due to a heart condition?). But then there’s Fergie, too —

Sarah Ferguson, Duchess Of York, Diagnosed With Malignant Skin Cancer

 Twice within a year she’s had a different cancer diagnosis. At least, that’s the line being put out —

Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, shared on Sunday that she has been diagnosed with a malignant form of skin cancer, the Daily Caller reports. The tragic diagnosis was discovered while Ferguson was undergoing treatment for breast cancer.

“Following her diagnosis with an early form of breast cancer, Sarah, Duchess of York, has now been diagnosed with malignant melanoma,” said a spokesperson for Ferguson. “She is undergoing further investigations to ensure that this has been caught in the early stages too. Clearly, another diagnosis so soon after treatment for breast cancer has been distressing but the Duchess remains in good spirits,”

Additional details shared include that Ferguson was found to have several moles while undergoing reconstructive surgery in 2023 following a mastectomy. A biopsy performed found one of the moles to be cancerous.

And Prince Edward? This from GB News on January 31, 2024 —

Prince Edward to take a break from Royal Family duties as King and Kate remain sidelined

Notice William gets a mention, too —

The Duke of Edinburgh recently returned from a trip to South Africa and Saint Helena

Prince Edward is taking a break from Royal Family duties as the King and Princess Kate recover from recent medical procedures.

The prince has recently returned home from his trip to South Africa and Saint Helena this month but will not be returning to royal duties for at least a week.

It comes during a pivotal week for the Royal Family as Princess Anne, Queen Camilla and the Duchess of Edinburgh are the only senior royal working members.

The Prince of Wales is also not able to perform any royal duties as he cares for his wife, Kate, and looks after their children.

Where are they really?


King Charles III diagnosed with cancer, Buckingham Palace says

By Sean Coughlan

Royal correspondent

King Charles has been diagnosed with a form of cancer, says Buckingham Palace.

It is not prostate cancer, but was discovered during his recent treatment for an enlarged prostate.

The type of cancer has not been revealed, but according to a palace statement the King began “regular treatments” on Monday.

King Charles leaves hospitalIMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES

Buckingham Palace says the King “remains wholly positive about his treatment and looks forward to returning to full public duty as soon as possible”.

He will postpone his public engagements and it is expected other senior royals will help to stand in for him during his treatment.

No further details are being shared on the stage of cancer or a prognosis.

The King, 75, returned to London from Sandringham in Norfolk on Monday morning and the palace says he has commenced treatment as an outpatient.

Although he will pause his public events, the King will continue with his constitutional role as head of state, including paperwork and private meetings.

There is a constitutional mechanism for when the head of state is unable to carry out official duties – in that circumstance “counsellors of state” can be appointed to stand in for the monarch.

At present that includes Queen Camilla, Prince William, Princess Anne and Prince Edward, with Prince Harry and Prince Andrew no longer to be called on as non-working royals.

Prince William had also temporarily withdrawn from public engagements while he helped his wife Catherine, the Princess of Wales, as she recovered from “abdominal surgery”.

But it was announced earlier on Monday he would return to public duties later this week.




The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

4 Comments on Are the Royals being taken out once and for all?

  1. They haven’t been. These sickness reports are likely to get them out of the way, because they already are.

  2. Makes me wonder if the other Globalists “forgot” to warn the Royals of the true purpose of the Clot Shots and they were all gullible enough to take them.

  3. My two cents:
    Kate had an ectopic pregnancy that had to be aborted.
    God forbid either of those topics be addressed publicly as regards a royal.

    Other’n that, I couldn’t care less what happens to the rest of the louts behind those rock walls.
    Well, maybe William needs to be saved….Kate ‘n the kids will need him.

    Cancer – turbo cancers, particularly – are all the trend now with the double-, triple-, fourple-jabbed people.

    But I’m still shocked that the royals would have been given the deadly shots – surely they should have been wiser?….but there’s so much to the history and connections between royal families and the WEF cabal, et al…I really shouldn’t be surprised if traditional royalty are being picked off…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.