Of course it’s alarming them because around 50% of their work and income comes from vaccination. It does, however, support Dr. Peter McCullough’s impression below. Do readers of an older generation ever remember having to see a paediatrician at all, and having a truckload of injections? Neither do we. It’s been a make-work medical sector for the most part.
********
US Childhood Routine Vaccination Rates Plummeting
CDC/HHS Report: Parents Declining Shots for Children Born in 2020 and 2021
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
One of the unavoidable collateral effects of the COVID-19 vaccine debacle is a growing general distrust and loss of confidence in routine childhood vaccines. Are there any data suggesting parents are starting to decline or delay routine childhood vaccinations?
Hill et al authored a CDC/HHS report published in MMWR that found a significant reduction in the acceptance of routine across the board. The authors added:
“A recent analysis of trends in parental vaccine hesitancy during 2019–2022 found an increase in hesitancy among parents of children aged 5–11 years after authorization of COVID-19 vaccine, but not among parents of those aged 6 months–4 years (5). Parental vaccine hesitancy might be contributing to the low levels of influenza vaccination coverage, due to a higher degree of hesitancy among parents about influenza vaccine compared with other routine childhood vaccines. Hesitancy about influenza vaccine has been observed to be more highly correlated with hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccine than with other childhood vaccines, indicating that parents might perceive influenza vaccine differently than they do other routine non–COVID-19 childhood vaccines (6).”
Hill HA, Yankey D, Elam-Evans LD, et al. Decline in Vaccination Coverage by Age 24 Months and Vaccination Inequities Among Children Born in 2020 and 2021 — National Immunization Survey-Child, United States, 2021–2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024;73:844–853. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7338a3
In my view, the authors are grossly understating the negative impact COVID-19 vaccination is having on the routine childhood schedule.
I found it odd that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine acceptance for babies 6 months an older was selectively omitted from this report.Multiple sources of data indicate for a healthy children, there are better outcomes and a greater freedom from childhood diseases if they remain unvaccinated and develop a natural pattern of immunity.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.
Featured image source: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-03-11/parents-delaying-kids-vaccines-posing-risk-to-toddlers
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply