The UK’s Assisted Dying Lobby and its Publicists

.

ER Editor: Brits are having euthanasia practices pushed down their throats, much like Canadians. In two days from now, British MPs will have to vote on the ‘assisted dying’ bill, a private members’ bill, which seems to be getting pushed through. See this BBC report —

‘Hardest decision of my career’: MPs wrestle with assisted dying choice

Of note:

On Friday, MPs will make one of the most profound decisions of their political careers: how to vote on the assisted dying bill.

If it became law, the bill would give some terminally ill people in England and Wales the right to die at a time of their choosing.

Hundreds of MPs have spent the last few weeks sifting through the evidence, emotions and ethical dilemmas of the bill.

The issue has split Parliament, and the outcome of the vote is unknown, as the majority of MPs have not revealed how they will vote.

MPs have been given a free vote, meaning they can follow their conscience rather than party orders.

But it also leaves them to bear the responsibility – and the consequences – of their choice alone.

MPs normally gauge the mood of their constituents via the emails that flood into their offices, discussions and regular meetings.

But the assisted dying bill feels different, inspiring greater reflection and a deeper dive into personal experiences.

TWEETS —

Recommended listening —

********

The Assisted Dying Lobby and its publicists

Very little has been said about the “unelected forces” pushing the Assisted Dying Bill

Amid all the “debates” about assisted dying, very little has been said about the “unelected forces” pushing the bill for it.

Take Guido Fawkes’ recent finding that “the campaign group backing Kim Leadbeater’s assisted dying bill, Dignity in Dying, is ramping up its online advertising game. In the past 90 days alone, they’ve splashed out an eye-watering £181,122 on Facebook and Instagram ads, while since 2018, the total spend has topped £650,000.” 

Is that not rather important information? Might MPs want to raise this in Parliament before moving onto the merits of the debate? Who is calling the shots here?

Parts of the media seem to be very interested in the bill, too. Take Paul Brand, the UK Editor of ITV News, who has relentlessly tweeted about assisted dying; perhaps more than you would expect for a news journalist.

You can see even more examples on his X feed.

Another person who appears to have an interest in assisted dying is Carol Vorderman, who – incidentally – hosted Brand at her recent book launch:

Here’s a passage from Vorderman’s book, which mentions Dame Esther Rantzen and assisted dying:

The coincidences don’t just end there. Global, which runs LBC (where Vorderman had a presenting gig), has been pushing the issue hard on its shows, including The News Agents:

Moreover, Global owns an enormous amount of outdoor advertising space in the UK, which has been used for Dignity in Dying adverts – as I spotted at Westminster tube the other day. This is, of course, the place where MPs/ lawmakers are most likely to see adverts.

SEE VIDEO HERE

One of my X followers also spotted the same at Oxford Circus tube:

Another coincidence relates to More in Common, the organisation set up in Jo Cox’s name – which might help explain the link to Leadbeater (this is me speculating rather than proven fact), who seemed to become invested in this issue overnight.

Brand publicised its latest research on assisted dying:

LBC also gave it a plug:

And Carol Vorderman (former LBC – Global – presenter) mentioned director Luke Tryl in a tactical voting campaign for Best for Britain in 2023:

SEE VIDEO HERE

Although many might think of More in Common as a polling firm, it has quite lofty ambitions, working “on both short and longer term initiatives to address the underlying drivers of fracturing and polarization, and build more united, resilient and inclusive societies.” It has become a major force in global democracies…

… seeking to influence public opinion as well as measure it…

… and it’s spurred by big backers:

NB. This year the Tories gave taxpayer funding to one of these:

PAID) Why did the Tories give £250k of taxpayers' money to the Barrow Cadbury Trust?

PAID) Why did the Tories give £250k of taxpayers’ money to the Barrow Cadbury Trust?

·
3 Nov

 

Anyway, the point of this article is really to point out the “small world” phenomenon I often come across with Labour/ left wing policies.

Maybe all of these connections – between Brand, Vorderman, Global and so forth – are a total coincidence.

Whatever the case, voters deserve to know the funders behind Dignity in Dying.

Source

************

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Have something to say? Leave a comment!