ER Editor: Regular readers will have noticed that we have published little on the WHO pandemic treaty by which nationstate sovereignty would be forfeited under nonsense claims of ‘pandemics’.Dr. Mike Yeadon recently came out to declare that pandemics have likely never existed. It’s a bogus phenomenon, much like the ‘virus’. We believe this WHO treaty has long been stopped, if it ever actually got started. Similarly, we aren’t much worried over the so-called ‘Disease X’.
But this latest step in the process is interesting, a NOTICE OF LIABILITY delivered to key INDIVIDUALS at the WHO, named in the document. (If they’re not already locked up, which we strongly believe they could be.)
Notice below that with all the immunities and exemptions WHO people like Tedros have under Article 67 of the WHO constitution, the Notice of Liability document usefully points out that all these privileges only apply when WHO officials are implementing Article 1 of that Constitution, that is the ‘attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health’. Did they attempt to do this? Obviously not, as the Liability Notice points out.
********
The Notice of Liability delivered to individuals at the W.H.O. this week
Addressing both corporate and personal liability in wrongdoing
2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
Sickly ironic how the eugenicist technocrat puppet and DEATHVAX™ pusher man Bill Gates installed a Marxist war criminal to head the World Health Organization (WHO) to manage the “health” of the planet as they escalated their global power grab via the PSYOP-19 scamdemic.
And now they are positioning to take all rights away through their illegitimate “pandemic” treaty for their follow-up gain of function viral release and VAIDS coverup DISEASE-X.
Below you will find the text of the Notice of Liability delivered to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz and Jeremy Farrar this week. It was drafted with the help of specialist international lawyers and health scientists.
Feel free to copy, paste and adapt for the purpose of notifying others of their liability in relation to the Covid-19 fraud.
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: a man
dba: Director General World Health Organisation (WHO)
On behalf of living men, women and all their sons and daughters living right now and those yet to be born on Earth, we hereby place you: a man: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, doing business as the Director General of the World Health Organisation (hereafter W.H.O), on notice that:
Your actions carried out in the capacity of Director General of the W.H.O during the Covid-19 chapter, principally consisting of falsely informing world governments of a so-called pandemic, thereby causing governments to declare non-existent medical emergencies, have been and are still an integral part of a chain of events that is resulting in mass loss of life, immense physical harm and untold psychological distress and trauma to the people on this planet;
Said actions appear to have led to Governments deploying insufficiently tested SARS-CoV-2 genetically modified organisms (GMOs) falsely termed ‘vaccines’ being also gene therapies, mandating unscientific masking protocols, implementing inhumane and anti-scientific ‘social distancing’ measures, purchasing and deploying ineffective and fraudulent PCR tests subsequently used to create false ‘case-demics’ in order to justify unlawful ‘lockdowns’, business closures and house arrest;
We demand that, with immediate effect, you cease and desist from taking further actions that would involve false and fraudulent communication to governments thereby causing or resulting in further instances of the kind of catastrophic outcomes outlined above.
Notice upon Personal Liability
We also put you on notice that failure to cease or desist from continued or repeated involvement or implication in the above harms shall render you liable both in your personal and corporate capacity. As a man, you shall be investigated for criminal conspiracy. As a corporate officer, you shall be investigated for gross negligence, serious misconduct in public office, corporate fraud and potentially even aiding and abetting corporate manslaughter.
Further to the above Notices, and in order to clarify our position, may we take this opportunity respectfully to remind you of your own position and legal responsibilities.
WHO Constitutional Obligation
The objective of the World Health Organization (WHO), according to Article 1 of the WHO Constitution, is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.1 Thus, in your role as WHO Director-General, you are obliged to consult with a diversity of experts, including those who disagree with your recommendations on health, to ensure that best practice is ethically and objectively promoted to uphold the best interests of the public.
As early as 2021, international experts were cautioning against the novel Covid strategies recommended by the WHO Covid team, especially but not limited to the experimental modRNA medical technologies developed at ‘warp speed’ to function purportedly as vaccines.
The WHO Constitution states in Article 67 that members of the WHO may enjoy ‘such privileges and immunities as may be necessary for the fulfilment of its objective and for the exercise of its functions.” Such privileges and immunity, whilst patently unfair, inequitable and dangerous, only apply when fulfilling the Article 1 objective.
By your unilateral recommendation of harmful Covid strategies, The People, represented by the World Council for Health, do not believe that you acted in accordance with your constitutional obligations in Article 1. If your actions are found to be in contravention of Article 1, you will not be covered by Article 67 of the WHO Constitution that provides for the stated protection and immunity. In other words, you may be personally liable for the millions of deaths and immense suffering caused on account of your role in the unlawful authorisation of these harmful recommendations. Moreover, given the blatant conflicts of interest evident in the WHO’s activities, closely connected to commercial interests, immunity is not guaranteed when acting at the behest of those interests.
Consequences of your WHO Covid Policies, Recommendations, Advice and Omissions
1. Immeasurable suffering and death
In the past four years, billions of people who trusted and complied with WHO-based country government advice have experienced ongoing physical and mental suffering, illness, disability, loss of income, poverty, child abuse, other violence, and even death as a result.
2. Human rights violations
Country governments worldwide implemented severe emergency measures directly based on WHO recommendations that consequently resulted in widespread violations of fundamental human rights. Boys, girls and babies were masked and injected. Living men and women expressing, or wishing to express their right to free speech, travel, bodily autonomy, and to choose, were threatened, intimidated, coerced, neglected, abused and in some cases assaulted, imprisoned or killed. The WHO did nothing to address the harm it caused.
3. Failure to recommend inexpensive, safe and effective treatments and remedies for Covid-19
Covid-19 can be effectively treated with safe and established multi-purpose generic medicines, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, in combination with zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, and other immune-boosting, health-promoting and anti-coagulant treatments. Failure to disclose and raise awareness of these, and failure to recommend ivermectin widely in combination with zinc for early use, meant that millions of people suffered and many died as a result of not being offered effective early and late treatments.
By recommending ivermectin only in the context of clinical trials and omitting sound and practical advice on how to attain the highest level of health during the Covid-19 scare, ivermectin and other effective treatments were withheld in many countries in favour of expensive GMO drugs, emergency-authorized patented pharmaceutical drugs without safety records. Thus, in your personal capacity, the world’s people may hold you responsible for the consequences of serious omissions related to safe, effective treatments for Covid-19, in preference for undisclosed GMOs.
4. Dangerous GMO gene therapies deployed in the guise of vaccines
You may also be personally liable for death, loss and suffering in relation to the SARS-CoV-2 ‘vaccines’ as you have not advised people of the following:
The long-term material risks of these ‘vaccines’ are unknown. The LNP-modRNA platform fulfils EU, UK, South African, Australian, and US legal definitions for being properly deemed a genetically modified organism (GMO), and a gene therapy, where material risks are identified over a period up to 15 years and perhaps into offspring. People were not advised as required by law that the so-called ‘vaccines’ are, in fact, GMOs.
Pfizer used one process to manufacture the products that they submitted for approval but a different process to manufacture the product supplied for injection into the world’s people. The latter product was manufactured using E.coli bacteria and plasmid DNA which has resulted in excessive synthetic DNA contamination confirmed as able to integrate with the human genome. Moderna’s use of plasmid DNA in manufacture has also led to excessive synthetic DNA contamination.
Pfizer products includes a SV40 virus-derived enhancer gene sequence. This gene sequence is known to facilitate the transport of the synthetic DNA into cell nuclei, posing a real risk of chromosomal integration. This threatens permanent genetic modification of inoculated people without their knowledge or consent and can only be harmful.
The contents of these genetic injections do not stay in the arm muscle.
Spike proteins are produced for a prolonged and unknown period of time, possibly indefinitely.
These spike proteins trigger extensive microvascular blood clotting as well as large vessel blood clots.
Spike proteins are deposited in many tissues and organs including the heart, brain, testis, ovaries, liver and spleen, causing tissue degeneration and disease.
The large quantity of spike proteins may overwhelm the immune system, causing immune system dysfunction and worsening risk of all infections and cancers.
The spike protein is toxic in itself, but this foreign antigen also marks the victims’ own tissues as non-self, triggering autoimmune disease within these tissues.
The antibodies generated are non-neutralizing and worsen Covid disease; this is “antibody dependent enhancement” of infection.
Undeclared plasmid DNA in these products carries further dangers; especially in the case of Pfizer and the concealed SV40 enhancer and promotor sequences. This includes the disruption of tumour suppressor genes, and adds to the list of mechanisms by which these products increase cancer risk.
The artificial modRNA in these products is hyper-persistent due to the substitution of N1-methylpsudouridine in place of uracil. This prolongs the production of the toxic spike proteins, but also causes ribosome frame shifting, such that a variety of unpredictable proteins and polypeptides are also generated. These pose serious risk for triggering a large spectrum of autoimmune diseases.
Additionally the pegylated lipid nanoparticles, which deliver the genetic payload into the victims’ cells, are toxic in and of themselves.
5. Violation of informed consent
Based on your authority as the designated WHO Director General, the majority of people around the world trusted your words when you stated that Covid-19 GMOs and gene therapies were “safe and effective”. This claim cannot be substantiated and is further disproved by Covid-19 vaccine contracts. As such, the right to free and informed consent was violated for every human being who was injected with the experimental Covid-19 GMO gene therapy called ‘vaccines’.
In addition, it appears that at no point did you appraise people of the risks associated with these experimental GMO injections, nor have you shared the mounting vaccine injury reports with the public. Vigibase, the WHO pharmacovigilance collaboration with the University of Uppsala, holds the records of over five million people suspected of harm due to the Covid-19 genetic ‘vaccines’, yet you have failed to demand and ensure transparent, independent and timely analysis of these data.
This is in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code, that was agreed to in 1948, to prevent non-consensual medical experimentation on human beings, following gross human rights violations during the Second World War.2 Your failure to advise on, recommend, promote and ensure free and informed consent for these Covid-19 GMO gene therapies can be prosecuted for both breach of your duty of care as well as for battery.
World Council for Health Invitation
It is our opinion that the health of the World’s People is much poorer for the actions that you have taken during the course of your work responsibilities at the World Health Organization. In the circumstances, we are morally obliged to invite you to defend your actions or apologise publicly with a plan for reparations. A World Council for Health Country Council General Assembly is scheduled to take place on May 21, 2024, to hear your response and to agree on further necessary actions.
In the interim and in future, we demand that you cease and desist from spreading disinformation about the Covid-19 GMO gene therapy products with immediate effect.
By the men and women named below:
World Council for Health Steering Committee
Shabnam Palesa Mohamed (WCH Africa), Fahrie Hassan (WCH Africa), Emma Sron (WCH N. America), Dr.Marivic Villa (WCH N. Americas), Dr. Mark Trozzi (WCH N. America), Izumi Kamijo (WCH Asia), Rev. Dr. Wai Ching Lee (WCH Asia), Dr. Gilbertha St Rose (WCH Caribbean), Christof Plothe DO (WCH Europe), Dr. Mazen Nasreddine (WCH Levant), Lucinda van Buuren (WCH Oceania), Dr. Anne O’Reilly (WCH Oceania), Prof. Héctor Carvallo (WCH Latin America), Marco Albertazzi (WCH Latin America), Dr. Tess Lawrie (WCH Chief Coordinator)
‘Notice to principals is notice to agents and vice versa’
The WHO and its employees can no longer say they are ignorant of the issues and public concerns. Here is the signed receipt of the documents:
The World Council for Health Steering Committee is extremely grateful to lawyers Philipp Kruse, Julian Gillespie, David Adelman and the many, many others who informed, assisted and supported this international collaboration toward truth, justice and accountability.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
3 Comments on The Notice of Liability delivered to individuals at the WHO this week
You have a detectable style.
See these Roguski videos, too:
According to Roguski, the “pandemic” treaty and IHR amendments do not appear currently to be targeted toward usurping national sovereignty based on the latest information – the aim is now different:
“…In my view, fights around the WHO pandemic treaty and WHO IHR amendments are distraction maneuvers to occupy the time and energy of people who might otherwise work on repealing or nullifying federal and state public health emergency and communicable disease control law.
Seven federal public health emergency, communicable disease control, biological product licensing and vaccination laws that should be repealed by Congress, and nullified by state legislatures:…
Tools Congress members and state lawmakers can use to repeal and nullify the federal laws, and the state versions of same:…”
In any event, there is no scientific basis for a “pandemic” treaty. As ER notes in this article, Yeadon pointed out there likely has never been any “pandemic” in history; and “virions” have never been proven to exist. In other words, the concept of “infectious” disease, “contagion,” germ “theory” and pathogenic “virions” and “germs” are long-refuted hypotheses and thus unscientific despite prevalent belief in the germ “theory” inculcated over the past 120+ years after Rockefeller/Carnegie acquired U.S. medical schools at the start of the 20th century, shut down the useful naturopathic curricula and transformed medicine into the current allopathic system. These concepts are kept alive only through pervasive medical propaganda, science “fiction” novels/movies, unscientific “infectious” disease curricula taught in the allopathic medical schools and phD programs, and suppression of the facts. There thus is no scientific basis for the massive “biosecurity” complex. Unfortunately, there is too much money involved in the revenue streams of vested private and public sector entities generated from the unscientific belief in “infectious” disease and “biosecurity.” As a result, the Big Pharma/Big Biotech/Biosecurity complex is grossly overvalued. None of these public and private entities or their financiers want this exposed. Therein lies the conundrum.
You have a detectable style.
See these Roguski videos, too:
According to Roguski, the “pandemic” treaty and IHR amendments do not appear currently to be targeted toward usurping national sovereignty based on the latest information – the aim is now different:
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exit-the-world-health-organization
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/cp/144238749#details
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/greed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOU6u4j-fKI&t=3s
And see this:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/globalist-misleaders-focus-public
“…In my view, fights around the WHO pandemic treaty and WHO IHR amendments are distraction maneuvers to occupy the time and energy of people who might otherwise work on repealing or nullifying federal and state public health emergency and communicable disease control law.
Seven federal public health emergency, communicable disease control, biological product licensing and vaccination laws that should be repealed by Congress, and nullified by state legislatures:…
Tools Congress members and state lawmakers can use to repeal and nullify the federal laws, and the state versions of same:…”
In any event, there is no scientific basis for a “pandemic” treaty. As ER notes in this article, Yeadon pointed out there likely has never been any “pandemic” in history; and “virions” have never been proven to exist. In other words, the concept of “infectious” disease, “contagion,” germ “theory” and pathogenic “virions” and “germs” are long-refuted hypotheses and thus unscientific despite prevalent belief in the germ “theory” inculcated over the past 120+ years after Rockefeller/Carnegie acquired U.S. medical schools at the start of the 20th century, shut down the useful naturopathic curricula and transformed medicine into the current allopathic system. These concepts are kept alive only through pervasive medical propaganda, science “fiction” novels/movies, unscientific “infectious” disease curricula taught in the allopathic medical schools and phD programs, and suppression of the facts. There thus is no scientific basis for the massive “biosecurity” complex. Unfortunately, there is too much money involved in the revenue streams of vested private and public sector entities generated from the unscientific belief in “infectious” disease and “biosecurity.” As a result, the Big Pharma/Big Biotech/Biosecurity complex is grossly overvalued. None of these public and private entities or their financiers want this exposed. Therein lies the conundrum.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409?language=en-US
How the WHO “pandemic treaty” will incentivize man-made pandemics – Part 1 [9/2023]
https://www.bitchute.com/video/O0gZxFmRaLc1/
“WHO power grab, James Roguski”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ux5w1DzDjA
And re the Treaty, good to follow Roguski’s the one to follow on substack.