Russia’s Demographic Crisis is Slightly Worrying

ER Editor: Readers might also be interested in this article from January of this year, titled Russia’s demographic setback.


Russia’s demographic crisis is slightly worrying

The situation was already bad. Two years of Public Health has made it worse.

More Russians needed.

Russia’s Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) recently published a report, “On the Socio-economic Situation,” which contains some rather troubling data from January-May 2022.

The socio-economic situation in Russia, according to media reports citing Rosstat, is not so good:

Every month since the beginning of the year, Russia has lost 86,000 people. There have never been such losses in the entire modern history of [Russian] statistics. Even in 2002, when there were 685,000 fewer Russians, the number of citizens decreased by 57,000 per month.

At the same time, the death rate in January-May decreased by 36.1 thousand, to 878.3 thousand. But the birth rate also fell—by 31.1 thousand, to 523.2 thousand children. The difference between these indicators results in a natural decline of 355 thousand people. For every Russian who is born, there are 1.7 deaths. […]

Since the beginning of 2020, the population of Russia has decreased by 1.62 million people.

As we mentioned earlier, the situation could be described as slightly worrying.

And there’s more.

Russian media outlets are reporting that the country’s birth rate has plummeted to levels not seen since the Great Patriotic War.

We were very skeptical of this claim when we first read it—because if you really think about it, it’s terrifying—but even Russian lawmakers are making similar pronouncements.

Tatyana Butskaya, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Family, Women and Children, said in a recent interview that April 2022 saw the lowest birth rate since WW2.

Unfortunately there’s more. has just published a sobering overview of Russia’s demographic crisis. It’s a must-read, but it’s also very painful to read.


The article concludes:

  1. Out of 236 countries, Russia has the world’s 15th largest increase in mortality—38%, or 675,000 additional deaths.
  2. All analysis data show that COVID accounted for only less than a tenth of excess mortality in Russia.
  3. Life expectancy has fallen by 4.5 years.
  4. The “natural” population decline has exceeded one million people, which has never happened in any country in the world since 1950.
  5. In terms of the total population loss, Russia is first place in the world.
  6. In terms of fertility per woman, Russia ranks 193rd in the world (1.49 children in total) and 30th in Europe (out of 48). In 2015, Russia was ranked 9th in Europe.
  7. Russia has only one good indicator—a decrease in infant mortality. Russia has the 40th lowest infant mortality rate in the world (10th if you don’t count the countries of Europe).

As Nakanune points out, what distinguishes Russia from other countries is its shockingly high mortality rate among the working-age population:

In terms of mortality under 40, Russia ranks 158th in the world and last in Europe—63 per 1,000 population. That is, 6.3% of citizens do not live up to 40 years. These are unacceptably large numbers, unworthy of a great power, especially in the light of many years of statements about success in increasing life expectancy. It is no less striking that Ukraine, which is ahead of Russia, has a mortality rate of up to 40 years that is 30% less—44 deaths per 1,000. Russia is not just the last in Europe, but far behind even Ukraine.

The Russian government has all sorts of programs and initiatives aimed at reversing this trend. For example, a program designed to bolster the country’s population was launched at the end of 2021. The plan includes better health care monitoring (at least in theory), and also expands social benefits for households with children.

As BNE reported in November:

Russian President Vladimir Putin has put dealing with Russia’s demographic crisis at the top of his agenda since his first day on the job. The Kremlin successfully reversed the demographic decline in the last decade and stabilised the population size. However, more recently as the demographic dent caused by the chaos of the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s hits the curve, the population has started to fall again.

The new policies are a continuation of the former efforts to boost the birth rate and protect newborns. The aim is to reduce infant mortality to 0.45% by 2024. The plan also pays attention to the development of quality requirements for kindergarten care for children under school age. Families with at least three children are to receive free land equipped with the technical infrastructure needed for housing.

There were signs of real improvement. Natural population growth began to increase in 2013, but has stayed in the red since 2017. And now it is very, very red.

A natural population decline of more than 1 million people in 2021. (source)

How to solve this problem? We need more injections, according to RT. In fact, anyone who hasn’t been injected is basically begging to die. There you go. Demographic crisis solved. Thanks, RT.

Question More (source)



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.