.
ER Editor: A reminder that those vaccine contracts were always redacted to a ridiculous degree such that nobody could find out what they contained, and that Ursula von der Leyen had originally negotiated them over her work phone with Pfizer’s Bourla. When 180 right-leaning MEPs tried to find out what was in them through an official inquiry, they were blocked. That is what we have been told. Now the continuation of that.
Politico.eu also has this —
Right-wing lawmakers to sue Parliament over blocked corruption inquiry
BRUSSELS — One of the EU’s top courts is being asked to examine whether the European Parliament breached its legal obligations by denying lawmakers the chance to investigate the bloc’s handling of vaccine contracts.
According to a legal file, seen by POLITICO, the General Court has received a motion prepared by MEPs from right-wing and far-right parties that argues a decision by political group leaders on Sept. 3 to not allow a vote on the establishment of an investigative committee was unlawful.
MEP Christine Anderson —
🇬🇧🇺🇸🇨🇦 We are going to the European Court because we want the Plenary to vote on the request to establish a Committee of Inquiry. We need sunlight and transparency instead of backroom dealings.
🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭 Wir gehen vor den Europäischen Gerichtshof, weil wir wollen, dass das Plenum… pic.twitter.com/pCnnyQSb6F— Christine Anderson (@AndersonAfDMdEP) November 11, 2025
********
European Parliament Taken to Court for Blocking Vaccine Inquiry
Precedent suggests that a review of Brussels’s pharmaceutical contracts could take several years—meaning claims of corruption will continue to fester.
LUKACS FUX for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE
A top European Union court is being asked to examine whether the European Parliament (EP) breached its legal obligations by denying MEPs the chance to investigate the bloc’s handling of vaccine contracts.
The challenge is being brought by representatives of the Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) and Patriots for Europe (PfE) EP groupings, as well as from the centre-right European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), which in April called on colleagues to support an inquiry into
allegations of corruption, money laundering, abuse of power, and undue interference in legislative processes.
ESN chief whip Christine Anderson (Alternative für Deutschland) declared
More than 180 Members demanded an inquiry into how the EU handled billions in vaccine contracts and related dealings.
ECR lawmaker Charlie Weimers added that
this is not a political issue for the court to consider, but rather a procedural, legal one where rules quite obviously were not followed … we are rather optimistic that this will go our way.
The EP now has until November 20 to respond to the request for an expedited ruling. If the standard procedure is followed, however, the case could take years before a final decision is reached.
Lukács Fux is currently a law student at Pázmány Péter Catholic University in Budapest. He served as an intern during the Hungarian Council Presidency and completed a separate internship in the European Parliament.
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply