Donald Tusk and his son in the centre of a fraud case

Donald Tusk and his son in the centre of a fraud


Poland’s erstwhile prime minister and currently the president of the European Council is still the spiritual leader of the present day political opposition in his own country and is doing his best to gain much respect in Brussels. In Poland he was perceived as the one who danced in attendance on the German chancellor Angela Merkel, an assumption which seems to be confirmed by the fact that he was promoted so high in the EU structures. The Western European is likely to believe that Donald Tusk has been assigned this high-ranking post in recognition on the part of the EU of his contribution to establishing the rule of law in Poland, and probably does not know that his Civic Platform party experienced a resounding defeat in the parliamentary election just a few months after Donald Tusk’s transfer to Brussels. The question that arises is whether the promotion of the Polish prime minister was not a helping hand extended to him by Angela Merkel, who both rewarded him for his compliance and, at the same time, saved him from the verdict of the voters as well as that of the court of law (see below).

Currently Donald Tusk is taking steps aimed against his own country, but is he doing it out of concern for the alleged lack of democracy and the rule of law in Poland or rather as an act of retaliation for the fact that his party lost power, and that the new government has set up a committee whose task it is to investigate his participation in the largest fraud in recent years?

Contrary to his statements that in his capacity of the president of the European Council he will be “impartial and politically neutral towards all 28 member states,”1) Donald Tusk seizes every opportunity to attack and rebuke the Polish government. In 2016/2017, when for almost two months the Polish parliament was occupied by the opposition, Tusk threatened Poland with legal consequences for the 2017 budget that had been passed allegedly in violation of the regulations.2)

As he was bringing this political pressure to bear on the Polish authorities exactly at the time when the government’s opponents were holding protests in Warsaw, Donald Tusk for all practical purposes was supporting an attempt at a coup d’etat and did his best to create bad press in the West for his own country. Then again, he used threats against Poland for not agreeing to accept the immigrant quota from Syria,3) and lately he warned against voting into law the act on the supreme court.4) Each of the mentioned events the western media covered was done in a biased way against the Warsaw government, creating an impression that Poland was undergoing unfavourable changes.

The diagram does not show the subordination of particular entities but merely the relationships that exist between them.

Consider the question again: is Donald Tusk so disapproving of the Polish government because he cares about democracy and the rule of law allegedly violated by Warsaw, or is he driven by other motivations?

The Amber Gold fraud, which for some time now has been subjected to the scrutiny of a parliamentary inquiry committee, may provide an answer. Amber Gold is a Polish financial service company, commonly referred to as a Ponzi scheme, which was active in the years 2009-2012, and was founded by Marcin P., who earlier had been sentenced on several occasions to prison for bank fraud, embezzlement and forging of documents. Yet, all the sentences were mysteriously suspended5) till again the Amber Gold fraud put him and his wife Katarzyna on a collision course with the law. The company, which invested in precious metals and tempted clients with an attractive interest rate of 13% for their deposits secured in gold, silver and platinum, was also the main shareholder of the OLT Express airlines (which went bankrupt in 2013). Within a few years Amber Gold cheated almost 19 thousand customers, whose joint loss amounted to 850 million złotys (approx. 234 mln dollars). It transpired that the company, rather than store gold as collateral for its financial activities, served as a money launderer.6) As early as December 2009 (i.e. in the year when the company was set up), the Financial Oversight Commission issued a warning that Amber Gold had no permit to carry out banking activities, in particular it had no permit to accept financial deposits and expose them to risk.7)

Amber Gold had almost all shares in OLT Express, and OLT Express employed Michał Tusk, the prime minister’s son. Although he would pass himself off as someone who had expertise in the aviation market, he was employed in the PR department. When the chairperson of the Inquiry Committee on the Amber Gold Fraud asked him whether he had anything to do with advertising agencies, Michał Tusk, appearing as a witness, answered he never had. Why then was the prime minister’s son employed there in the first place?8)

The transcripts from the hearings of Amber Gold’s president, now the accused Marcin P., shed some light on it. It turns out that the Amber Gold company (the owner of OLT Express for all practical purposes) regarded Michał Tusk’s employment as a kind of protective umbrella and it is hard to imagine that the then prime minister Donald Tusk was not aware of it,9) all the more so since on several occasions he was warned that Amber Gold was a Ponzi scheme by the highest ranking civil servants like Marek Belka, president of the National Bank of Poland10) or in 2012 by Krzysztof Bondaryk, chief of the Internal Security Agency.11)The prime minister did not react. Was it because OLT Express owned by Amber Gold employed his son Michał? Marcin P. admitted the following: “I employ the prime minister’s son. As long as he works for us, I think we are untouchable”,12) and Michał Tusk testified that “together with my father, we knew that the whole enterprise [Amber Gold] was, to put it bluntly, a sham”.

Top members of Donald Tusk’s Civic Platform Party maintained suspicious contacts with the president of Amber Gold. The ad below, shot in 2011, shows Paweł Adamowicz, mayor of Gdańsk, together with the local authorities and other Civic Platform politicians, draw an OLT Express plane along the runway of the Lech Wałęsa Gdańsk Airport.



Defence Minister Antoni Macierewicz addressed the prime minister in a parliamentary speech, commenting on the adduced ad: “It is a mafia-like scheme under which nobody could as much as touch Marcin P. and I’m afraid that you [Donald Tusk] will soon be known as Donald T.”13)

During the hearings, Marcin P. testified that the mayor of Gdańsk and former Polish prime minister Ewa Kopacz (both members of Donald Tusk’s party) had contacts with Amber Gold.14) The parliamentary Inquiry Committee found it difficult to interrogate the people involved since they all complained about their poor memory or resorted to a variety of excuses to avoid responsibility. For instance, Public Prosecutor Barbara Kijanko, who in 2009 scrutinized Amber Gold, was first on long-term sick leave and then applied for earlier retirement due to her health problems.15)

Defence Minister Antoni Macierewicz emphasised that: “It was not only the former prime minister but also the intelligence services which were subordinated to him involved in the Amber Gold fraud”.16) Similarly, investigative journalist Cezary Gmyz ascertained that Amber Gold could not function without the support of the intelligence services, and that the money stolen from citizens had been laundered. The suspicion that the intelligence services were involved seems to be confirmed by a note in which a Gdańsk Internal Security Agency officer warned Marcin P. of impending arrests a week prior to the event.17)

Marcin P. appears to have been used as a front man and now is being used as a scapegoat, so the Inquiry Committee seeks to uncover the masterminds behind that fraud. Whether the Committee will manage to unmask them or not remains to be seen.


Original article

ER recommends other articles by Gefira


1. Tusk: nie czuję się odpowiedzialny za starcie z polskim rządem, TVP INFO 2017-03-08.
2. Tusk: trzeba liczyć się z poważnymi konsekwencjami, 2017-01-11.
3. I wszystko jasne: Tusk też grozi Polsce. Straszy konsekwencjami, bo nie chcemy przyjąć uchodźców, niezależ 2017-05-17.
4. Donald Tusk po przyjęciu ustawy o SN: Polsce grozi marginalizacja na arenie międzynarodowej, wyborczapl 2017-07-20.
5, 7. Amber Gold, Wikipedia.
6. Amber Gold, Wikipedia; Komisja ds. Amber Gold: syn Tuska był politycznym parawanem, TVP INFO 2017-06-23.
8. Była wiedza u najważniejszych osób w państwie o tym, że ta piramida jest, TVN24 2017-06-22.
9. Maciarewicz: Donald Tusk rozpiął parasol ochronny nad Amber Gold, Do rzeczy 2017-06-25.
10. Powiedziałem, że to piramida finansowa. Belka ostrzegł Tuska przed Amber Gold?, TVN24 2014-06-16.
11. „wSieci”publikuje notatkę ABW w sprawie Amber Gold. Mieli dostać Tusk i Komorowski, TVN 24 2017-07-03.
12. Dopóki Michał Tusk u nas pracował, nikt nas nie ruszył. Ujawniono stenogramy rozmów Marcina P. Do rzeczy 2017-06-25.
13. Paweł Adamowicz o zarzutach Antoniego Macierewicza, WPwiadomości 2012-08-31.
14. Marcin P. sypie. Kopacz i Adamowicz na liście osób z lokatami w Amber Gold?, 2017-06-28.
15. Afera Amber Gold. Prokuratura Barbara Kijanko w czerwcu nie przejdzie w stan spoczynku, inferiafakty 2017-02-23.
16. Antoni Macierewicz: od dawna były hipotezy, że D. Tusk rozpiął parasol ochronny nad Amber Gold, 2017-06-26.
17. Co zeznał szef Amber Gold ? Kilka cytatów Marcina P…, niezleż 2017-06-28.

2 Comments on Donald Tusk and his son in the centre of a fraud case

Comments are closed.