Alexander also sounds off again on Dr. Robert Malone being part of this. We believe he’s gone and has been replaced since he is likely the criminal Dr. Alexander believes him to be. Nonetheless, this movie is getting old and tired very fast. When do we get truth and justice? Alexander —
Look at this 2025 reporting and we ask, did the dimwits on that ACIP group not see this report? That you ACIP morons would still continue recommending the flu shot?(here follow screen shots of reports illustrating his point) …
So, how could then on June 26, 2025, the newly struck up CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) go on to vote 6-0 to re-recommendthe annual seasonal influenza vaccine for all persons aged 6 months and older without contraindications? 6 months old? infants too? What are these dimwits on ACIP thinking? A very dangerous decision and here again Trump is being subverted. They all know they are doing this without proper data or science. For I challenge them to make the science available to the public so that we ‘actual’ epidemiologists and research methods people etc. can comment on the lack of science. These people are doing the exact same thing they raised money on and fame complaining that prior ACIP did? It is remarkable.
New ACIP Panel Votes to Remove Thimerosal—But Still Recommends Flu Shots for Nearly All Americans
A long-overdue move on thimerosal still leaves millions subject to annual flu shots that increase flu risk by 27% and non-influenza infections by 340%. New group still missing the… pic.twitter.com/j0e45i04NW
— Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® (@P_McCulloughMD) June 26, 2025
On a glass half-full reading, we can only assume that these one-step-forward (remove thimerosal, which is a form of MERCURY!!), one-step-back moves (revelation that flu shots don’t work and make you sick, yet we’re still recommending them) wakes us the public to each step of this nasty vaccine agenda. Step 1: thimerosal. Step 2: flu shots.
(What about the mRNA death injections?)
********
New ACIP Panel Votes to Remove Thimerosal—But Still Recommends Flu Shots for Nearly All Americans
A long-overdue move on thimerosal still leaves millions subject to annual flu shots that increase flu risk by 27% and non-influenza infections by 340%
NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
Jun 27, 2025
On June 26, 2025, the newly formed CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted 6–0 (with one abstention) to reaffirm its recommendation for annual influenza vaccination for everyone aged 6 months and older without contraindications:
In a separate set of three consecutive 5–1 votes (with one abstention each time), ACIP recommended that children, pregnant women, and adults should receive only thimerosal-free single-dose influenza vaccines:
BREAKING: ACIP votes to recommend influenza vaccines free of thimerosal.
“ACIP recommends children 18 years and younger receive seasonal influenza vaccines only in single dose formulations that are free of thimerosal as a preservative.”
Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that is extraordinarily toxic. A comprehensive review by Geier et al concluded:
The culmination of the research that examines the effects of Thimerosal in humans indicates that it is a poison at minute levels with a plethora of deleterious consequences, even at the levels currently administered in vaccines.
While this recommendation marks a long-overdue shift, its practical impact is limited. Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in 2001 and only a small portion of flu vaccines still contain thimerosal. (ER: But why is it there at all?)
The real problem is that ACIP is continuing to recommend annual flu shots for nearly the entire population, despite new data suggesting these vaccines actually increase the risk of illness.
Those who received the flu shot were 27% more likely to contract influenza compared to those who remained unvaccinated (Hazard Ratio = 1.27; P = 0.007)
Estimated vaccine effectiveness was –26.9%, indicating more illness among the vaccinated group
NEW STUDY – Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu
This aligns with prior research, including a randomized controlled trial by Cowling et al, published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that children who received the inactivated flu vaccine had a 4.4-fold (or 340%) increased risk of virologically confirmed non-influenza respiratory virus infections, such as rhinoviruses, coxsackie/echoviruses, and coronaviruses.
Removing thimerosal is a long-overdue move. But recommending annual flu shots with negative effectiveness and increased susceptibility to other viral infections is not evidence-based. It’s time to reevaluate the entire policy.
Featured image source: https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/rfk-jrs-vaccine-committee-advises-35459777
Featured image source: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/influenza-vaccines/cdc-vaccine-panel-recommends-avoiding-thimerosal-flu-vaccines
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
Leave a Reply