.
ER Editor: A useful reminder that Washington DC was a separate, autonomous territory from the US, just as the City of London and the Vatican were (we’re deliberately using past tense). These were swamps of cabal control and Trump had long ago pledged to drain them. Further, Trump speaks in code. What does ‘liberation’ actually mean, therefore? Likely there are additional meanings being conveyed.
Check out this tweet with 11 parts —
Liberating The Capital
🇺🇸1/
Something historic is unfolding in Washington DC right now – except it may no longer even be Washington DC as we’ve known it.Trump has just federalized the National Guard… and according to intel drops from Mr. Pool, we may be on the verge of… pic.twitter.com/CZOhN9Ifhl
— BenDanklin (@Benjwmindanklin) August 12, 2025
Text of 6 of 11 tweets —
Something historic is unfolding in Washington DC right now – except it may no longer even be Washington DC as we’ve known it. Trump has just federalized the National Guard… and according to intel drops from Mr. Pool, we may be on the verge of witnessing the New Republic Constitutional Order come to life. Even Google Maps has quietly shifted in recent years – labeling it simply as “Washington.” Why would the world’s biggest mapping platform strip “DC” from the name… unless the status had already changed? The kind of event we’re living through could redefine America itself.
For over 150 years, DC hasn’t truly been “America’s capital.” Since the Act of 1871, it’s been a corporate city-state – aligned with London and the Vatican, functioning as a foreign-controlled entity inside our borders. This wasn’t just political corruption – it was an occupation in disguise. Instead of the beating heart of freedom, DC became a parasite feeding off the lifeblood of the Republic.
Mr. Pool’s drop makes the moves crystal clear: •Federalizes Washington DC •Revokes autonomous status shared with London & Vatican •Frees DC from corporate control tied to foreign bankers since 1871 This is not mild reform. It’s the equivalent of storming the enemy’s headquarters, seizing their command center, and cutting their lifeline to the outside world.
Why does federalizing the Guard matter so much? Because under Title 10, every soldier answers directly to the President – not to governors, not to mayors, and definitely not to entrenched bureaucrats. It bypasses the corrupt political middlemen and connects the Commander-in-Chief directly to the boots on the ground. When that chain of command shifts, the entire battlefield changes.
(8) Once DC is cut free from its corporate leash, the dominoes fall at lightning speed: •The Federal Reserve’s grip on our money evaporates •The original Constitution becomes supreme law once again •The income tax scam dies alongside the global crime syndicate that created it It’s not just a political change – it’s the demolition of a prison that most people didn’t even know they were living in.
(10) This is not a political stunt. It’s the visible flash of a long-running military operation – one that’s been carefully staged in the shadows since before most people even knew the war had started. The goal is nothing less than ending the 1871 coup, reclaiming our sovereignty, and breathing life back into the Republic our Founders risked everything to give us.
And this is worth checking out from Clandestine —
Trump Orders Review of Smithsonian!
The White House just sent a letter to the Smithsonian, notifying them that there will be a “comprehensive internal review” of their entire operation, to include inspection of their collections.
This comes the day after Trump just took federal control of DC, took control of Metropolitan police for 30 days, and deployed the National Guard to DC…
The Smithsonian Museums have an infamous underground tunnel system connecting a vast network of museums underneath the National Mall…
***
The article below is pretty typical fare on the subject.
********
Trump Sends National Guard to Liberate DC from Gangs, Maniacs & Homeless
G. CALDER via THE EXPOSE
President Trump has just made one of the most aggressive federal interventions in Washington DC’s recent past. Described as “liberation day in DC”, the president has seized control of the city’s police force – for the first time in its history – and deployed an additional 800 National Guard troops in order to restore order in the country’s capital.

Why Trump Intervened
According to President Trump, DC’s murder rate is “higher than some of the most dangerous places on earth”. (ER: As a result of whom? Who were the victims?) He cited the capitals of Colombia and Mexico as comparisons. He further argued that Washington DC should be one of the safest, cleanest and most beautiful cities anywhere in the world, vowing to make it so by removing the homeless population and allowing the police to do “whatever the hell they want” in order to restore order, saying “that’s the only language they understand. They like to spit in the face of the police. You spit, and we hit, and they get hit real hard”. He has also suggested he will send in the military if needed.
One of the key motives is a recent incident of alleged assault in the city involving a 19-year-old government staffer. Following the attack, Trump took to Truth Social last week to threaten to “federalize” the city if local authorities failed to address crime, saying “crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control”. He continued “If D.C. doesn’t get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run.”
Reality on the Ground in Washington DC
Despite the bold move, it’s reported that the crime situation in DC may not currently be as critical as President Trump is claiming. In 2023, homicides spiked to a 25-year high, but violent crime has once again dropped sharply. As of the day Trump took office on 2025, however, the city had returned to a 30-year low in violent crime, and homicides have already fallen another 26% since January according to police data.
Mayor Muriel Bowser, along with various city officials, argue that their crime reduction strategies are working, and that there is currently much more order in the city today than there has been for decades. Bowser, who believes the president’s intervention is politically motivated and described it as “unsettling and unprecedented” has still pledged to cooperate with the federal government.
Political Fault Lines
Hakeem Jeffries, House minority leader, labelled Trump a “wannabe king” saying his plan to “unleash the national guard on the city’s youth and homeless population has no basis in law”. Democrats in general have been quick to frame the move as a political stunt.
Meanwhile, civil rights leaders including Al Sharpton, are suggesting that the move is another distraction from ongoing controversies and cited critiques of how the administration is currently handling the Jeffrey Epstein files. Sharpton, who is the founder and president of the National Action Network, said “Donald Trump was inspired to take this disgusting, dangerous, and derogatory action solely out of self interest… Let’s call the inspiration for this assault on a majority Black city for what it is: another bid to distract his angry, frustrated base over his administration’s handling of the Epstein files.”
However, allies of Trump appreciate the strong law-and-order message being sent to voters who are concerned about safety and urban decay. Attorney General Jeanine Pirro, for example, has already openly called for harsher treatment of young offenders and pushed for more juvenile cases to be tried in adult court.
How This Could Affect Everyday Americans
Residents of Washington DC will see an influx of armed National Guard troops, a federalised police force, and the potential disappearance of homeless encampments around the city. Some people will feel a renewed sense of safety, while others will fear an increase of heavy-handed policing and the erosion of local democracy.
Nationally, though, this could set a precedent. If DC can have its police force federalised based on claims that public safety is at risk despite falling crime statistics, then other cities could, in theory, follow suit. Chicago, San Francisco or New York could risk seeing similar moves if the White House deemed them unsafe.
Why Now?
Timing seems an important factor to consider here. Trump’s actions in Washington DC could be seen as part of building his campaign narrative, showing a tough-on-crime stance that appeals to his base, while critics see it as political theatre aimed at energising supporters ahead of the vote. The president appears to be sharpening his law-and-order stance to prove that he’s the president who can, and will, “clean up” American’s cities. There are also broader debates ongoing about homelessness, urban crime, and striking a balance between civil freedoms and public safety.
Public narrative looks polarised: is this a calculated political power grab over a city that currently votes Democrat, or a genuine attempt to protect citizens and beautify the capital?
What Might Happen Next
It’s likely that the increased policing could deliver a temporary dip in street crime and visible disorder, meaning Trump can claim a political victory. It’s also possible that local backlash leads to city officials and residents push harder for DC statehood and protect against future interventions, while other cities may begin to fear similar takeovers – especially if Trump claims success in DC and gains public support for the measure. It’ll also be interesting to see whether civil rights groups challenge this move in court, based on the argument that it could violate constitutional limits on federal authority.
Let’s see.
Final Thought
Deploying the National Guard in DC, and taking control of its metropolitan police force, has the potential to affect more than just the local area. It’s not only a test of federal authority, it’s a warning shot for other cities, and a clear statement of political philosophy in the US.
History may look at this either as a dangerous overreach into local governance, or as a vital turning point in restoring law and order around the country – time will tell. Will DC’s “Liberation Day” mark the start of a safer city, or a new era of political control over America’s urban life?
Source
************

••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Leave a Reply