.
ER Editor: We had published on this back in July and August, 2024 respectively, with solid reporting from eugyppius. The titles tell us the story. See —
German Interior Minister bans AfD-adjacent “right-wing extremist” magazine, raids homes of editorial staff, seizes assets
The German government just banned COMPACT Magazine, the largest patriotic magazine in Germany, due to their criticism of censorship, covid measures and mass migration.
At 5am this morning, the German police raided the home of COMPACT’s editor-in-Chief, Jürgen Elsässer.
Yet… pic.twitter.com/6WXSMWFW4W
— Brittany Sellner (@BrittPettibone) July 16, 2024
German federal court temporarily lifts Nancy Faeser’s ban on Compact Magazine
Again, popcorn alert. This story seems to be in Round 3, having been simmering away for almost a year.
Translation: Today’s trial has significance far beyond COMPACT and may become a historic model trial!
Der heutige Prozess hat eine Bedeutung weit über COMPACT hinaus und wird vielleicht ein historischer Musterprozess! pic.twitter.com/GVDQW0CXM0
— Jürgen Elsässer (@JurgenElsasser) June 11, 2025
********
Press Freedom at Stake (Again): Germany Weighs Ban on Right-Wing Mag
Government-critical Compact was initially banned on the grounds of “combatively and aggressively” striving to topple the democratic order.
ZOLTAN KOTTASZ for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE
The federal administrative court in Leipzig has started to hear the case regarding the ban of German right-wing magazine Compact.
In what was seen by right-wing commentators as an attempt to curb press freedom and silence conservative voices, the interior ministry last year banned Compact for “inciting hatred” and “aggressively propagating the toppling of the political order.”
Jürgen and Stephanie Elsässer at the Compact Summer Festival event “WE for Peace and Freedom” in Gera, Germany Photo: Dirk Bindmann, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
.
The move was unsurprising given the fact that the ruling elites in Germany have for years been persecuting parties, organisations, and even ordinary citizens who dare to criticise the establishment parties and their failed policies.
The court, however, suspended the ban only a month later, claiming that though it had found evidence of Compact “violating human dignity,” upholding a free press takes precedence.
The interior ministry appealed the decisions, and a final ruling on whether the ban was justified is set to be announced as early as this week.
According to editor-in-chief Jürgen Elsässer, the first day of the hearing on Tuesday, June 10th, focused on whether the interior ministry had unlawfully used a law governing associations to ban a press publication. Banning an association is less difficult because it is not protected by the freedom of the press.
Mir gingen heute gleich mehrere Lichter auf, wie man sieht. Tag 1 nähert sich dem Ende! pic.twitter.com/IV5x53VCua
— Jürgen Elsässer (@JurgenElsasser) June 10, 2025
The wider issue being discussed, however, is whether the activities and statements of Compact go beyond the expression of opinion and pose a concrete threat.
Compact is an anti-establishment, anti-immigration publication founded in 2010. It has a circulation of 40,000, an X account that counts 78,000 followers, and a YouTube channel with 512,000 subscribers. Its number of followers has rapidly increased since last year’s ban. (ER …)
The magazine has been in the crosshairs of the establishment for many years for holding up a mirror to the government on its failed policies, including the decision to allow millions of migrants to enter Germany illegally.
The ban was heavily criticised by conservative media, which called the move an attack on democracy and free speech by a government that has been using every political and legal means possible to undermine its political rival, the second strongest party in Germany, the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD).
The rhetoric surrounding Compact—saying it had “combatively and aggressively” acted against the constitutional order—is similar to the one being used to stigmatize the AfD which many mainstream politicians also want to ban.
Not surprisingly, mainstream politicians, including then-chancellor Olaf Scholz defended the ban, with Scholz stating that “freedom of the press includes being able to say a lot of nonsense, but there are limits that you can’t overlook.”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply