Paris’ Annual March for Life Puts Euthanasia in the Spotlight

.

ER Editor: We see the same agenda items being played out repeatedly, and in different western countries. The euthanasia one has been played to death in Canada to wake people up. Also in the UK. Now it’s France’s turn. Thoughtful people we know here are taking this very seriously, writing letters to particular senators.

A reminder that the globalist-Marxist cabal have been a death cult, promoting all sorts of anti-life agendas under the guise of choice, caring and respect for others. The Covid death agenda was merely the latest iteration. They also hate the feminine, to have thoroughly perverted it. Notice that in the report below.

LINK

********

Paris’ Annual March for Life Puts Euthanasia in the Spotlight

This year, the fight against “assisted dying” has taken precedence over the fight against abortion.

HELENE de LAUZUN for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE

Courtesy of Le Salon Beige

Ten thousand people gathered in the heart of Paris to reiterate their opposition to the introduction of a ‘licence to kill,’ which until now has been prohibited by French law but has been made a political priority for 2026 by Emmanuel Macron in his New Year’s address to the nation. “We will see through the legislative work on the issue of dying with dignity,” he said at the time, eager to complete the long and drawn-out legislative process to legalise euthanasia, which has been held up for many months due to the turbulent political calendar, early elections, and successive changes of government.

Two bills are concurrent: one, highly consensual, on the promotion of palliative care; the other, more controversial, on the creation of ‘aid to die.’

The movement’s spokeswoman, Geneviève Bourgeois, a geriatrician, said she was alarmed by the “deadly movement that has been taking hold of the collective consciousness for more than fifty years.”

Pro-life advocates against euthanasia are engaged in a fierce semantic battle. In such a debate, every word has meaning and can save lives—or, conversely, hasten death. For example, during the debates, the Senate replaced “the right to assisted dying” with “medical assistance in dying.” For Marie-Lys Pellissier, also a spokeswoman for the movement, the change is not insignificant. “It’s a question of medical assistance, so we consider the act of killing to be a form of care.” This idea that death is a form of care is already present among some feminists, who also describe abortion as “care like any other.

The participants in the Paris March for Life are young: many children, students, and large families. It is true that the bitter cold of January weeds out all but the most courageous and resilient. The organisers deliberately created a joyful and festive atmosphere to break the label of ‘fundamentalist Catholics’ that part of the press tries to attach to the demonstrators. The Catholic Church was represented by Bishop Rey, former bishop of Fréjus-Toulon, known for his conservative positions and his attachment to traditional liturgy. Before the procession set off—symbolically, a stone’s throw from Les Invalides, the venerable royal institution founded by Louis XIV to welcome the wounded and maimed of war and restore their ‘dignity’—a tribute was paid to Charlie Kirk, who was murdered in September and “died for defending life.”

Among the political figures present were MEPs Margarita de la Pisa Carrión and Laurence Trochu, as well as Jean-Frédéric Poisson, president of the Christian Democratic party VIA. Louis XX, duke of Anjou, legitimist claimant to the throne of France, was there, as he is every year.

Among the crowd, the goals differed from person to person. For some, the fight is primarily political, and they hope that mobilisation in the streets will make enough parliamentarians vote against the law during the last sessions on the agenda of the two assemblies. For others, the fight is being played out elsewhere, in the long term. They realise that the vote is already lost, but that the battle for public opinion must continue in order to remind people of the intangible values of life and love for the weakest members of society, right up until their last breath.

Several very concrete demands were also made throughout the speeches, such as the establishment of a major national plan for palliative care and the absolute guarantee of conscientious objection for all healthcare personnel.

The National Assembly has already voted in favour of the bill, which, if adopted, would be one of the most permissive in the world. The Senate is due to vote on January 28th, before a final review by the National Assembly in February.

Hélène de Lauzun is the Paris correspondent for The European Conservative. She studied at the École Normale Supérieure de Paris. She taught French literature and civilization at Harvard and received a Ph.D. in History from the Sorbonne. She is the author of Histoire de l’Autriche (Perrin, 2021).

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*