.
ER Editor: Two RT reports from over the weekend.
********
Rubio delivers Trump’s ultimatum to Panama
The US president has warned that “something very powerful” will happen unless the country curbs Chinese influence over the canal
RT
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged Panama to reduce Chinese influence over the Panama Canal or face potential US retaliation. He made the remarks in Panama City on Sunday during his first overseas trip as top diplomat.
During a meeting with Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino and Foreign Minister Javier Martinez-Acha, Rubio conveyed President Donald Trump’s concerns that Panama is violating the 1977 treaty with the US which guarantees the permanent neutrality of the critical waterway.
“This status quo is unacceptable, and absent immediate changes, it would require the United States to take measures necessary to protect its rights under the Treaty,” Rubio told Mulino, according to a summary of the meeting released by the US State Department.
Mulino described the talks as “respectful” and “positive,” noting that while he acknowledged Washington’s concerns, he did not perceive an immediate threat of US retaliation.
“I don’t feel that there is any real threat at this time against the treaty, its validity, or, much less, the use of military force to seize the canal,” Mulino told reporters after the meeting. “The technical team can discuss the matter with the United States and clarify any doubts they may have,” he added, ruling out negotiations with the US over the canal’s ownership.
As a concession to the US, Mulino announced that his government would not seek to renew its 2017 agreements with China under Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative and would even consider ending the deal early.
Trump has repeatedly threatened to take back control of the Panama Canal, citing “ridiculous fees” and concerns over China’s growing influence around the waterway, which was built by the US in the early 20th century and handed over to Panama in 1999.
On Sunday, Trump warned that “something very powerful is going to happen” if Panama does not comply with US demands.
“I don’t think troops will be necessary in Panama,” he said, reiterating that what “Panama has done is terrible for national security in this part of the world.”
US officials have previously raised concerns that China’s activities in Panama may violate the 1977 Panama Canal Neutrality Treaty, which grants the US the right to defend the canal if its operation is threatened. Some US lawmakers argue that China’s economic presence – including infrastructure projects and port operations – could undermine the canal’s neutrality and compromise its security.
A key point of contention is the operation of ports at both entrances of the canal by Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings, a company US officials perceive as being influenced by the Chinese government. The $1.3 billion bridge, currently under construction by a consortium between China Communications Construction Company and China Harbour Engineering Company, is also viewed by some as a significant security risk.
Source
Panama to scrap infrastructure deal with China
The decision comes amid demands from Washington to curb Beijing’s alleged influence over the key waterway controlled by the country
RT
Panama will not renew its participation in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, President Jose Raul Mulino said on Sunday.
The announcement comes on the heels of Mulino’s meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who demanded “immediate changes” in managing the Panama Canal, a key waterway built by the US in the early 20th century and handed over to Panama in 1999. Washington believes the canal is under too much influence from China.
“The 2017 memorandum of understanding on the Belt and Road Initiative will not be renewed by my government,” Mulino told reporters following the talks with Rubio, adding that his government will also study the possibility of terminating the deal earlier, as it is not due for renewal for a couple of years.
During the talks, Rubio warned Mulino that by allowing China’s involvement in the canal, Panama is violating the 1977 treaty with the US which guarantees the permanent neutrality of the waterway. Rubio said that unless the country reduces Chinese influence, which Washington views as “a threat to the canal,” it could face potential US retaliation.
Rubio’s warning followed threats made over the past few weeks by US President Donald Trump, who said Washington could retake control of the Panama Canal if China’s presence around the waterway is not reduced and Panama does not lower the “ridiculous fees” the US has to pay for using it.
Trump reiterated his warning earlier on Sunday, telling reporters that “China is running the Panama Canal,” which was “given to Panama foolishly,” and the US is “going to take it back, or something very powerful is going to happen.”
Mulino said he did not perceive an immediate threat of US retaliation after his talks with Rubio, which he described as “respectful” and “positive.” He also ruled out negotiations with the US over the canal’s ownership.
“There is no doubt that the Canal is operated by our country and will continue to be so… President [Trump] has his opinion on the Chinese presence, which will be clarified in due time by the technical authorities of the canal,” Mulino stated.
Chinese officials have denied having any interest in infringing on Panama’s sovereignty over the canal. In December, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing will always recognize the Panama Canal as a permanently neutral international waterway.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a global development program launched by Beijing in 2013 which seeks to connect countries around the world through overland and sea routes, as well as digital and physical infrastructure. Panama was the first Latin American country to sign onto the initiative.
Under the initiative, Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings in 2021 won a 25-year contract for control over two ports at the canal’s entrances, and a consortium of Chinese companies has launched the construction of a $1.3 billion bridge over the waterway.
Source
Featured image source: https://www.rferl.org/a/rubio-trump-panama-canal-china/33300909.html
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply