.
ER Editor: While this petition may indeed come to nothing according to Helene de Lauzun for European Conservative, this is a small milestone in its way. Some people signing this (and we know some) used to be those blind, uninformed supporters of immigration, without ever really scrutinizing this major problem and what it has actually meant.
Further, French of a certain age are long in the tooth about referenda and how their Parliament chooses to ignore the will of the citizens it is supposed to serve. In 2005, the French voted (55%) to reject the proposed constitution of the EU, which would have ‘left the constitution with an uncertain future‘. France being the only country to have rejected it, the French Parliament chose to simply ignore that vote!
Further, given the French Constitution’s rigid limits on what subjects can be put to the referendum-style vote, we wonder if this is de Villier’s opportunity to expose it.
As of the afternoon of September 17, the petition has around 1.53 million signatures.
********
One Million Signatures for French Immigration Referendum
Sovereigntist and former MEP Philippe de Villiers wants to give a voice back to the people who reject ‘population change.’
HELENE de LAUZUN for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE
.
The former right-wing minister and founder of the successful Puy du Fou theme park did not expect such rapid and massive success. Launched during the first weekend of September thanks to an article in the Journal du Dimanche, the petition, which spread rapidly on social media, collected hundreds of thousands of signatures every day and reached the symbolic threshold of one million signatures on Monday, September 15th.
“It’s a surprise, but also a message. A surprise because things have moved very quickly: a million in ten days is unexpected! And also a message: the signatories see that we are no longer in control. We need to put pressure on the entire class that refuses to listen. You don’t want to see what we see, you don’t want to hear the cry of the people who don’t want to die,” explained Philippe de Villiers on Europe 1.
In the text accompanying the petition, Villiers takes up the argument of the ongoing change in the population. He considers that “immigration is no longer just one problem among many: it is the central issue, the one that drives all the others. We are in the process of changing our population.”
Prominent figures on the Right have claimed to have signed the petition, such as Laurent Wauquiez, leader of Les Républicains MPs and Bruno Retailleau’s unsuccessful rival for the leadership of his party. “I signed the petition for a referendum on immigration. How about you?” he proudly posted on his X account.
It is rare to achieve such rapid results in such a short time. A few weeks ago, another petition sparked widespread debate, calling for the repeal of the Duplomb law, which signatories viewed as harmful to the environment. It ultimately gathered two million signatures—but only after two months of campaigning. Villiers’ detractors are sceptical of the figures reported by the site hosting his petition, and the mainstream press accuses him of “links with the far right.” The petition against the Duplomb law was hosted on the National Assembly’s website and required secure identification via the France Connect public authentication system in order to participate. Villiers’ petition, on the other hand, is hosted on a website managed by a private individual and does not have a system for verifying multiple votes (wrong), which increases the risk of fraud. Villiers dismisses these objections. His website was the victim of a cyberattack, which he sees as proof that his fight is just and a cause for concern in high places. (ER: We accidentally tried signing it twice ourselves, and were rejected the second time.)
Villiers’ initiative is not the first of its kind. Before him, almost everyone on the Right has tried it.
Organising a referendum on immigration is one of the Rassemblement National’s recurring demands. A year ago, Éric Zemmour’s party, Reconquête, launched a petition for a popular initiative referendum, but the effort ultimately failed to gain traction. Les Républicains also tried their luck before having their request rejected by the Constitutional Council in April 2024. The argument remains the same: the subjects that can be put to a referendum are strictly defined by the Constitution, and no exceptions can be tolerated. It will take more than a million signatures to get the institutions to budge, as they are carefully locked down to guarantee the status quo on the highly sensitive subject of immigration.
Source
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply