.
ER Editor: Yesterday, the appeal to hear expert testimony in the case of a handful of Dutch vaccine-injured (and dead) plaintiffs was rejected: those experts whose names we know so well in independent media will not be heard as part of the case, which gets under way in late October.
Below we have responses from Interest of Justice (IOJ) who breaks it down for us, Dr. Joseph Sansone and Sasha Latypova. IOJ gives us an update on its own belaboured case against the Covid killshots in Costa Rica, where IOJ has been fighting the WHO as well as the Costa Rican government. This same expert testimony, rejected in Amsterdam, can be heard in Costa Rica.
********
BILL GATES GETS A LUCKY BREAK IN COURT — EXPERTS DENIED TODAY TO TESTIFY AGAINST GATES, PFIZER CEO BOURLA AND PM RUTTE IN AMSTERDAM
But Don’t Worry — Seven Seriously Injured Victims and a Dead Person Aren’t Going Anywhere. October Trial Still Coming. And IOJ Has Testimony Proving the Shots Were Never Vaccines. Justice Still Coming
INTEREST OF JUSTICE
Bill Gates caught a break today.
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled today — April 9, 2026 — that the appeal to hear expert witnesses in the case against Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte and 14 other defendants is inadmissible (ER: That makes 17 defendents). Not because the five nominated experts were unqualified. Not because the evidence was weak.
The court said the petitioners didn’t file the right procedural paperwork.
Under Dutch civil procedure, the petitioners filed under Article 186 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure — a voorlopig getuigenverhoor, a preliminary witness examination. The court ruled they failed to request leave to appeal from the lower court judge, and found no circumstance serious enough to override that requirement. A technicality. That’s it. BUMMER. (ER: To our non-legal ears, this sounds contrived.)
Sasha Latypova — the pharmaceutical executive who has exposed the military’s role in manufacturing the injections. Mike Yeadon — former Vice President of Pfizer. Katherine Watt. Catherine Austin Fitts. Joe Sansone. Five people with testimony that could crack open the entire official narrative. And the court didn’t engage with a single word of what they had to say.
The official Dutch judiciary website says it plainly: “niet-ontvankelijk” — inadmissible. No “special circumstance” serious enough to hear the appeal on its merits.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY apparently weren’t special enough.
DON’T PANIC. THIS ISN’T OVER.
Here’s what you need to understand about today’s ruling: it changes nothing about what’s coming next.
There are seven seriously injured people in the Netherlands who were harmed by these injections. At least one person died. And those plaintiffs have a separate case with a hearing on the merits set for October 22, 2026. Gates and Bourla have already been ordered to appear in person.
Think about what that means. Today’s ruling was about whether experts could testify BEFORE the main trial. The main trial is still happening. And when it does, these defendants are going to have to sit in a courtroom and explain how seriously injured people got that way. Someone died. They’re going to have to talk about how that happened.
They’re not getting away with this.
Sasha Latypova has already announced she’s heading back to the Netherlands for October 22. The experts aren’t going away. The injured plaintiffs aren’t going away. A procedural technicality didn’t make the evidence disappear. It just bought Gates and Bourla a few more months before they have to face it.
And meanwhile — something else is happening that the mainstream coverage of this ruling will never mention.
HERE’S WHY YOU SHOULD NOT GIVE UP RIGHT NOW
The Amsterdam case isn’t the only legal front against these people. It’s not even the most advanced one.
Interest of Justice has been fighting in Costa Rica’s courts for years. Not one case. Fifty-four cases. IOJ won five of them — specifically for violations of rights and concealment of information. And those five victories produced something that nobody else on Earth has.
Government testimony — under oath — that the COVID-19 shots were NEVER VACCINES.
Not by the legal definition of the legislator. The government’s own words: the definitions hadn’t caught up in 20 years. The products don’t meet the existing law’s definition of a vaccine. So rather than go through the Asamblea Legislativa — Costa Rica’s legislature — to actually change the law, the government issued a decreto ejecutivo (executive decree) to reclassify a product that doesn’t qualify as a vaccine so they could inject it into the population (whilst calling it a vaccine) without the informed consent protections that apply to experimental products under Costa Rica’s Ley General de Salud (General Health Law). That decree is completely illegal — you can’t bypass the legislature to override statutory definitions.
It took us many years. It took 54 cases. At first they said yes, it’s a vaccine. So IOJ filed again — how is it a vaccine? They said because “the WHO defines vaccines more broadly.” So IOJ came back. And came back again and again. We asked the question every possible way, closed every exit. And finally they couldn’t dodge anymore.
And what came out was the truth: it’s not a vaccine. It never was.
WHY THIS ONE FACT CHANGES EVERYTHING
If it’s not a vaccine, what is it? The FDA’s own Guidance for Industry: Human Gene Therapy Products defines gene therapy as products that “modify the expression of a gene” or “alter the biological properties of living cells.” mRNA products are literally designed to enter your cells and instruct them to produce a foreign protein. That is, by the FDA’s own published criteria, gene therapy. It’s experimental. It was always an experiment.
And if it’s experimental, then informed consent was legally required under the NUREMBERG CODE (1947), which states: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” Not optional. Not a nice-to-have. REQUIRED. The Code further provides that the person involved must “have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
Was informed consent given? Was a single person told they were receiving an experimental gene therapy product that doesn’t meet the legal definition of a vaccine?
No. They were told it was “safe and effective.” They were coerced, pressured, mandated. Under Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UNESCO, 2005), no one shall be subjected to medical experimentation without free consent. That’s not IOJ’s opinion — that’s binding international law.
And here’s why this matters for everyone, not just Costa Rica: if IOJ proves this in court and gets a ruling, it proves that the products injected into billions of people worldwide were not vaccines. That’s the one fact that opens up CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY cases everywhere. Without it, governments hide behind the word “vaccine.” With it, the entire emergency authorization, mandate, and WHO recommendation framework collapses.
IOJ may be one of the only organizations left standing that has both the evidence AND the legal pathway to prove this.
When IOJ pressed the court to order the government to answer which COVID products were imported as investigational or experimental — WHO was asked to answer by the Health Minister and World Health Organization/PAHO refused to respond. The court ordered it. WHO ignored the order.
That’s the same WHO that caused IOJ to obtain a default judgment in May 2025 — the first time in history WHO was found to have caused the default of a national court’s orders. IOJ then sued WHO for contempt after they ghosted court orders. WHO’s strategy is always the same: pretend the court doesn’t exist. Refuse to answer. Hope the case dies from lack of funding.
But it didn’t die. And now the record shows two things: the government says it’s not a vaccine, and the WHO won’t say what it is or which were imported as EXPERIMENTS.
AND THE EXPERTS? COSTA RICA JUDGES ALREADY ORDERED THEM HEARD.
Here’s the part that connects Amsterdam to Costa Rica.
The same experts who were just denied in Amsterdam on a technicality? In Costa Rica, the appeal court has already ordered that these witnesses need to be heard. Not requested. Not petitioned. Ordered.
The problem in Amsterdam was procedure. The problem in Costa Rica has never been whether these experts are valid — courts have already ruled on that. The problem has always been one thing: funding to get the cases fully processed and in front of a judge.
The experts can still come to Costa Rica. The judges ordered it. Stick with this process.
WE ARE AT A PIVOTAL MOMENT
Right now, IOJ is preparing to go back into court in Costa Rica with the government’s own testimony proving the shots were never vaccines. At the same time, IOJ is preparing to file one of the biggest cases in the United States — against the Department of Defense. Hitting them from every angle at once. Watch, it’s going to work.
It took years and years to get to this point. 54 cases. Five wins. A default judgment against the WHO. Government testimony that nobody else on Earth has. A judge-ordered Nuremberg public hearing. And now, at the moment when all of this comes together — this is not the time to lose faith.
Today’s Amsterdam ruling doesn’t mean anything for the substance of these cases. It means the system found a technicality. That’s what systems do when they’re protecting the powerful. They don’t beat you on the evidence — they exhaust you on procedure. They make it expensive. They make it slow. And they hope you give up.
IoJ is not giving up. Ever. Way too close to winning to quit!
CONTINUE READING HERE
********
Breaking: Netherlands Court Dismissed Appeal in Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Genocide and Bioweapons Case. Hearing on the Merits Set for October 22, 2026.
The Appellate Court in the Netherlands dismissed the appeal as inadmissible. See the press release below. We will post the English translation of the decision once we have it.
The hearing on the merits of the case will be on October 22, 2026 in Leeuwarden. This is a civil case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte, et al on behalf of injured plaintiffs. The case asserts that the COVID mRNA injections are bioweapons and a genocide crimes were committed.
This appeal was about allowing witnesses to testify at the trial court. The five potential witnesses in the case are Dr. Michael Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt, Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone.
You can watch my update from the Netherlands explaining the appeal.
On March 9, 2026, Attorney Peter Stassen gave a historic presentation to the appellate court. The hearing can be viewed here dubbed to English.
To support this legal effort in the Netherlands or read case materials visit the Recht Oprecht Foundation’s website here.
Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.
Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.
Source
********
Breaking: Amsterdam court dismisses the appeal to hear expert witnesses in the case v Dutch state officials, Albert Bourla & Bill Gates. Substantive hearing scheduled October 22, Leeuwarden, NL.
Press release from attorney Peter Stassen
Dear Readers, I have just received the message from Peter Stassen below. It is disappointing, but was expected. Nevertheless, we are not deterred, and I will be traveling to the Netherlands in October. We invite as many people as possible to come, this case is open to public, and we will have a press event afterwards. Details to follow. Please share this information and invite any journalist you think may cover this to consider attending.
The ruling and other materials will be published on the Foundation RechtOprecht’s website shortly. The Foundation is advertising a public information event on April 24. If you are in the NL this may be of interest to you.
Please consider donating to support this case.
CONTINUE READING HERE
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply