.
ER Editor: Episode Umpteenth in the Brigitte is a Man saga. The video of Candace Owens reporting on this is just below; the segment runs up to the first 35 minutes. Allegedly, a former federal US prosecutor, one Dan Nardello, was hired to investigate her before the Macrons filed their US suit against Owens.
See our coverage of Candace Owens covering the Brigitte soap opera HERE.
Interestingly, the Financial Times is being used to transmit Macron-side information, making sure it gets out to a very wide audience from a ‘respectable’ source. If this were real, why would the Macrons do that? The communication from FT reveals that nothing found on Owens has any relevance or justification. It’s just a smear job involving the usual ‘Russia’ and ‘far right’ elements. It demeans the Macrons, in sum.
The line being taken here is that Brigitte displays mental illness, that poor Macron is being controlled by a crazy woman. The lawsuit is going to cost Candace ‘millions’ so there is now a line of ‘Free Emmanuel’ T-shirts on sale. To us, this explains why that fake moment was put out, of Brigitte smacking/pushing into her husband’s face on the plane.
Photo images over time show that both Macron and Brigitte, their originals, have been removed. This is nothing like the real Macron from 2017. The Zerohedge photo below is not the original person either.
LINK
********
Macrons Secretly Hired Investigator To Dig Up Dirt On Candace Owens
French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron have been revealed to have hired a private investigation firm to research conservative commentator Candace Owens, according to a new report from the Financial Times. The investigation comes as the French presidential couple pursues a defamation lawsuit against Owens over repeated allegations across multiple platforms that Brigitte Macron was born male.
The cross-continental probe was conducted by New York-based firm Nardell & Co (ER: Nardello), which, according to the British business news outlet, attempted to uncover damaging information about Owens by scrutinizing her public statements and political connections. Investigators reportedly looked into whether the popular podcaster had any direct ties to Russian officials or business interests.
While the investigation failed to establish any direct Russian connections, researchers did document Owens’ online interactions with Russian political theorist Alexander Dugin. The report noted that both figures have shared each other’s content on social media platforms various times.
The 218-page lawsuit, filed in Delaware Superior Court last week, includes 22 separate counts against Owens, including defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and defamation by implication. The legal action centers on Owens’ repeated allegations across multiple platforms that Brigitte Macron was born male.
Researchers also documented her connections to other prominent conservative figures, including conservative journalist Tucker Carlson and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.
“When it comes to Brigitte Macron, abusing Emmanuel and then blaming it on Russia is an unfortunate and sinister pattern,” Owens responded to the Financial Times report.
The Macrons’ attorney Tom Clare has characterized the case as straightforward defamation, stating that Owens “both promoted and expanded on” what he called “discredited falsehoods originally presented by a self-proclaimed spiritual medium and so-called investigative journalist.”
According to court documents, Owens has promoted these claims through social media posts and an eight-part YouTube series titled “Becoming Brigitte,” which the Macrons’ legal team argues has led to significant online harassment of the first lady.
Court filings indicate the Macrons’ representatives made multiple requests for retractions before filing the lawsuit. The presidential couple said in a joint statement that legal action became “the only remaining avenue for remedy” after Owens allegedly continued to promote the claims.
Despite calls for retractions, Owens has stood firm in her position, declaring in a 2024 social media post that she would “stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man.”
The U.S. lawsuit follows mixed results for the Macrons in French courts addressing similar allegations. In July, a Paris appeals court overturned lower court convictions against two French women who had made comparable claims about the first lady. The appellate court ruled that defendants Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey had acted in “good faith” despite making false claims, eliminating their financial liability for damages previously awarded to the Macrons.
Source
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply