Game Over? Have Vienna’s Constitutional Judges Checkmated the Government? Explosive Questions That Were Previously Taboo

ER Editor: Chris Veber below lists the health-related topics that Vienna’s constitutional judges expect the Austrian Minister of Health to be answering in short order, precisely the tough questions that could blow up the whole Covid house of cards.

One of these is statistics, relating to dying with/of Covid, figures to do with illness following vaccination, and the crucial one of excess mortality, which is high despite there being fewer Covid deaths last year.

We recommend checking out this we published just this week on possible government manipulation of its health data, calculated by Steffen Hohnitz. It’s possible that health data regarding ‘cases’ has been inflated by up to 60%:

Bombshell: Extensive Corona Data Manipulation Revealed in Austria

********

Game Over? Have Vienna’s Constitutional Judges Checkmated the Government? Explosive Questions That Were Previously Taboo

A GUEST POST BY CHRIS VEBER

It’s over. On January 26, 2022, the Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) initiated an ordinance review procedure and sent a bundle of questions to the Austrian Minister of Health. Questions that were absolutely taboo until now. Which are shaking the foundations of the “pandemic”.

The Minister of Health has until February 18, 2022 to reply. That is also the end date of the “pandemic” in Austria.

In detail, the Constitutional Court wants to know whether the hospitalization and death figures include all infected people. The old on or with Covid question. If all those who tested positive were counted, the VfGH would like to know the reason.

Furthermore, the Constitutional Court wants a breakdown of the Covid deaths and hospitalizations. What was the cause of Corona? Was it only a meaningless “positive” test? He even asks the ages of the deaths and hospitalized!

The Minister of Health must also provide evidence that the FFP2 mask requirement makes sense.

Then we get down to business (for the pharmaceutical mafia). The VfGH puts the risk of dying from Covid at 0.15%. He asks how the absolute and relative risk reduction of a vaccination is to be understood. The VfGH wants to know how high the absolute risk reduction is after one, two or three vaccinations. The 95% effectiveness lie is over.

It gets even better. The “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is being called into question. The Minister of Health must answer to what extent the “vaccination” reduces the risk of infection, disease and transmission. Since “it seems to correspond to the state of the art that people with a Covid vaccination can also become infected with Sars-Cov-2, contract Covid and transmit Sars-Cov-2”.

Then we go into areas that are dangerous for the Minister of Health. The VfGH wants to know the risk of hospitalization after an illness and after a vaccination, broken down by age cohort and number of vaccinations. This is where the side effects of vaccination come into play, which until now have been so nonchalantly ignored.

Even the “lockdown for the unvaccinated” does not go unchallenged. The VfGH asks how much higher the bed occupancy would be without this lockdown.

The deadliest question for the government comes last. The Constitutional Court is asking for information as to whether it is correct that there will be fewer Covid deaths in 2021 but still a weekly excess mortality in the three-digit range. He wants to know how this excess mortality can be explained.

All of these questions have been asked by lateral thinkers, swashbucklers and “avengers” since the beginning of the “pandemic”. The government brushed them aside with the vigorous help of bought-in media and compliant pundits. Not anymore. The government must answer the VfGH’s questions.

I believe answering these questions will end the “pandemic”. It also ends the government. It seems we got off lightly once again. Let’s not forget this lesson. Freedom never dies dramatically. She dies little by little. We must never take them for granted. We must fight for them! Even now, until those in power were removed from office in handcuffs.

The complete letter from the VfGH can be found here.

************

Chris Veber’s blog

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.