.
ER Editor: If you’re not convinced this is all theatre by now, we don’t know what to tell you. First, France’s permissive assisted dying bill got passed in Parliament, creating much angst; then the Senate rejected it, creating mass relief. Now it’s back as a serious proposition. Senators on the LEFT (note) have hijacked the re-written bill, which emphasized a palliative care approach, taking it back to its original form. This is about waking up the public: agenda wars.
********
Final Twist at French Senate: Progressive Euthanasia Bill Back on Track
The Senate debates trying to ban assisted suicide unfortunately led to nothing.
HELENE de LAUZUN for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE
French parliamentarians continue to battle over the bill to legalise euthanasia.
Although, following an unexpected rebellion, senators managed to amend the bill in a way that was openly pro-life, the final vote in the upper house overturned all their work by rejecting all the amendments proposed by the Right. As a result, it is the initial deadly law that is likely to be adopted in the final reading.
There have been a series of twists and turns in the bill on euthanasia and assisted suicide—proof, if any were needed, of the extreme sensitivity of the subject and the lack of a clear consensus on the central issue of life and death, both in French public opinion and among parliamentarians.
A few days ago, senators from the right and centre managed, thanks to an extraordinary night-time mobilisation, to completely rewrite the bill so as to prohibit the use of lethal measures against patients at the end of their lives. Through various amendments, they succeeded in imposing a different vision of patient care, prioritising the relief of suffering and preserving the conscience of caregivers.
The text, which was initially intended to establish a “right to assisted dying,” had become one of an “enforceable right to the best possible relief without any voluntary intervention intended to cause death or assist in dying.”
Unfortunately, this victory was short-lived. In a final vote, left-wing senators fought back and mobilised to reject the amended bill on the grounds that it was now “emptied of its substance,” “disjointed” and “no longer made any sense.” Left-wing senator Bernard Fialaire justified his vote by expressing concern that the Senate would appear to be a “reactionary” assembly. The amended bill was then rejected by 181 votes to 122.
The consequences of this final reversal are serious. At the end of the parliamentary process, the version approved by the National Assembly at first reading will once again become the reference—the most permissive and dangerous version.
Debates will resume in the lower house on February 4th. The outcome is now virtually certain, as the National Assembly is generally in favour of a maximalist option and is not bound by the discussions that took place in the Senate.
Under these circumstances, the Senate’s adoption this week of the twin bill on palliative care and support for the sick went virtually unnoticed, as pro-life healthcare workers and doctors’ organisations had feared.
This is therefore not a time for optimism. The Jérôme Lejeune Foundation said, following the Senate vote, that while the bill is by no means a “democratic foregone conclusion,” the threat remains significant, given that it is the most permissive text in the world that is returning to the forefront of the Assembly.
Nevertheless, opponents of euthanasia refuse to admit defeat and intend to keep up the pressure by writing to MPs, in the hope that some of them will have a change of heart during the final vote scheduled for February 16th.
Source
Hélène de Lauzun is the Paris correspondent for The European Conservative. She studied at the École Normale Supérieure de Paris. She taught French literature and civilization at Harvard and received a Ph.D. in History from the Sorbonne. She is the author of Histoire de l’Autriche (Perrin, 2021).
Featured image source: https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/french-senate-progressive-euthanasia-bill-back-on-track/
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply