.
ER Editor: More stunning research from Candace, which has likely been known about deep stater ‘Brigitte’ forever. And revelations, also probably well-known somewhere, about the fake Philip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment, which allegedly revealed the levels to which humans can sink as cruel authoritarians under certain structured conditions. Was Brigitte part of this? Was she prisoner/subject 2093? Why was the French establishment so interested in this experiment prior to Macron first taking office? It’s an interesting dig into the subject.
********
NOTES
Intro: Why hasn’t Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT) ever sued Candace Owens? He could defend himself but hasn’t. Further, it’s crazy to have filed this lawsuit against her in the US since US culture doesn’t play into the sue-to-shut-someone-up political practice.
Before Candace’s break, there was a cliffhanger: who is the young man in the famous Philip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment from 1971? Who looks like JMT from the side. This was prisoner #2093.
Reminder: JMT was missing for more a decade, with three clues that will have relevance:
a) Brigitte was in the US during the time of the so-called moon landing, a NASA project
b) JMT was in engineering school
c) He was also in the military
One Thibault Le Texier wrote a book about the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). From a business management background, he allegedly became curious about the SPE and just decided to write a book about. This is not how book deals work: publishers want to make money so they usually employ experts who really know something about a subject. So he wrote a book which essentially DEBUNKED the SPE (‘nothing to see here, move along’), which Candace claims is likely a limited hangout. Curiously, the book came out in March 2017, just as Macron was sworn in as French president. Hulu then made a documentary based on this book.
In the acknowledgements of the book is one Raymonde Le Texier (female), who was a socialist senator in France. How did she help out her relative in this project? One Juliette Eisner, a French American, is also connected to this, turning the book into a documentary for Hulu. Which isn’t a particularly good documentary. Further, she had only done a documentary on cats before this. Research also turns up the name of Cortial, and an Edourd Cortial, from a prominent French family.
Why is France interested in this old Stanford experiment suddenly? Why do these French names pop up?
Key: Missing from the accounts of Zimbardo’s famous experiment are details of the participants. All of them were in some way linked to ENGINEERING, the MILITARY and NASA (see above). Their involvement was clearly not random.
For example, one Chuck Burton (we see a video clip of him), a participant, was also a Rothschild descendant. His father was Otto Hurstat of the Hurstat Bank. The family were linked to ownership of department store chain, Sears. Other participants, which Candace details, were connected to high levels of the military and corporate-connected families, what we call the ‘military-industrial complex’. Why didn’t Le Texier bother to mention all this? Why were the French so interested in debunking the experiment?
Only prisoner 2093 has never had his identity revealed. Candace shows us a grainy video clip of a minute or so within the experiment, which appears to show JMT, at least prisoner 2093 participating. “Fake and gay” declares Candace. We feel that’s a reasonable comment, frankly.
So was this Brigitte?
Stanford news archives of the time published two reports showing that there was a graduate student name Jean-Michel, who was a member of the French club and Bechtel military institute and who participated in drama/entertainment events. But there is no record of a Jean-Michel graduating from Stanford. So who was this guy?
Final interesting comment: this lawsuit filed by the Macrons against Owens gives her subpoena power. This should be an interesting angle going forward.
LINK
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply