
.
ER Editor: Just like proving Brigitte Macron is a woman, you put it to rest by showing some youthful photos. Just like demonstrating childhood vaccines are safe and effective, you compare the non-vaxxed kids to the vaxxed, with the result that vaccinated children are shown to be healthier. Instead, they always tested new vaccines against old ones, hiding a degree of harm by doing this. And the vaxxed/unvaxxed study would be anathema. This buried 2016 study, therefore, is the big one.
Given the monumental number of vaccines offered to US children right from birth, literally, and the volume of children in US schools with health and learning problems, we view the childhood vaccine schedule as a national security problem. If you want to weaken and sicken the future adult population, you do this. And this happened way before the mRNA ‘Covid’ shot.
***
See also this by Karen Kingston —
WHO Propaganda Exposed: Study to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy Backfires
September 10, 2025: The whole premise of school vaccine mandates is based on the reality that children with comorbid conditions are at a higher risk for developing serious disease, disabilities, and/or death if they become infected (or inoculated) with disease-causing pathogens than healthy children, AND THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE, meaning that a healthy child or adult is at no greater risk for harm from getting the vaccination than the wild-type infection (which is a false reality).
Yesterday, during a 3-hour Senate hearing, Attorney Aaron Siri, blew this premise to pieces.
********
Buried Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day
After five years of suppression, the results are here.
THE VIGILANT FOX
In 2016, Dr. Marcus Zervos agreed to the unthinkable: test the vaccinated against the unvaccinated.
Convinced it would prove vaccines safe, he vowed to publish the results no matter what.
Those results never saw the light of day—until now.
Here’s what the buried study revealed.

Meet Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit. He’s as pro-vaccine as they come.
In 2016, he crossed paths with health freedom journalist Del Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Dr. Zervos agreed to run the study, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”

In early 2020, Bigtree and team received a copy of the study. It was a retrospective vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison, examining the long-term health outcomes of 18,468 subjects.
Its title was “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study.”
Here’s what the results revealed:

Vaccinated children were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis than the unvaccinated.

They also had a sixfold increase in acute and chronic ear infections.

Speech disorders were 4.47 times higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated.

Meanwhile, the unvaccinated cohort showed zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

“This is devastating.”
Attorney Aaron Siri of ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) notes that this study should have been “rushed to publication on an emergency basis.”
But that didn’t happen.
ER: See 2:34 minute promotional video HERE

Why? Because publishing this would have ruined Zervos’ career.
As Siri testified at a Senate vaccine hearing on Tuesday, the overall findings showed that “after 10 years, 17% of unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of vaccinated children had at least one.”
That’s a more than threefold increase in the risk of chronic health conditions among the vaccinated.
Clip via @TheChiefNerd
🚨 Attorney Aaron Siri Shares the Results of a Bombshell Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study
“Overall the study found that after 10 years, 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue while 57% of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue.” pic.twitter.com/7WVwvK3ABW
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) September 9, 2025
“The only real problem with this study,” Siri stated, “is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.”
Huge credit goes to Del Bigtree, The Highwire, Attorney Aaron Siri, and others for 1) convincing Dr. Zervos to conduct this study and 2) bringing it to light.
The full documentary, titled An Inconvenient Study, is slated for release on October 3.

Until then, you can read Siri’s full testimony about this buried study and more here.
Source
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply